* Kurt Roeckx [2019-12-01 20:31]:
> F: Choice 1: Focus on systemd to promote standardization and
> cross-distribution cooperation
...
> I'm thinking about renaming F to just "Focus on systemd", to make
> it shorter. I'm not sure how devotee is going to like wrapping
> long lines.
Could you put t
> "Bdale" == Bdale Garbee writes:
Bdale> Kurt Roeckx writes:
>> I'm thinking about renaming F to just "Focus on systemd", to make
>> it shorter. I'm not sure how devotee is going to like wrapping
>> long lines.
Bdale> Not sure I "get a vote" on this, but that would work
Kurt Roeckx writes:
> I'm thinking about renaming F to just "Focus on systemd", to make
> it shorter. I'm not sure how devotee is going to like wrapping
> long lines.
Not sure I "get a vote" on this, but that would work fine for me.
The text should adequately elucidate the objectives, so trying
On Sun, Dec 01, 2019 at 11:48:42AM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx writes ("Re: Withdrawing Proposal C; Option Ordering; CFV
> Timing"):
> > The reason I didn't reorder it yet, is because it's talked about
> > like that. But I guess I can just reord
On 01/12/19 at 11:48 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx writes ("Re: Withdrawing Proposal C; Option Ordering; CFV
> Timing"):
> > The reason I didn't reorder it yet, is because it's talked about
> > like that. But I guess I can just reorder it on the pa
Kurt Roeckx writes ("Re: Withdrawing Proposal C; Option Ordering; CFV Timing"):
> The reason I didn't reorder it yet, is because it's talked about
> like that. But I guess I can just reorder it on the page, keep the
> letter but change the number.
Yes, please, do
On November 30, 2019 10:32:11 PM UTC, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>I have removed the proposal from the page. I'm not sure that is the
>best thing to do.
I think it'd be a little clearer to replace its title and text with
"(withdrawn)" or similar, then it'll be clear the missing letter is not a
mist
On Sat, Nov 30, 2019 at 05:34:09PM -0500, Sam Hartman wrote:
> > "Kurt" == Kurt Roeckx writes:
>
> Kurt> On Sat, Nov 30, 2019 at 05:15:25PM -0500, Sam Hartman wrote:
> >> > "Kurt" == Kurt Roeckx writes:
> >>
> Kurt> Anyway, I'm not sure what the "I'd like" means. Is that
> "Kurt" == Kurt Roeckx writes:
Kurt> On Sat, Nov 30, 2019 at 05:15:25PM -0500, Sam Hartman wrote:
>> > "Kurt" == Kurt Roeckx writes:
>>
Kurt> Anyway, I'm not sure what the "I'd like" means. Is that just
Kurt> an intention to do it, or did you do it?
>>
>> I
On Sat, Nov 30, 2019 at 05:15:25PM -0500, Sam Hartman wrote:
> > "Kurt" == Kurt Roeckx writes:
>
> Kurt> Anyway, I'm not sure what the "I'd like" means. Is that just
> Kurt> an intention to do it, or did you do it?
>
> I withdraw Proposal C.
I have removed the proposal from the page
> "Kurt" == Kurt Roeckx writes:
Kurt> Anyway, I'm not sure what the "I'd like" means. Is that just
Kurt> an intention to do it, or did you do it?
I withdraw Proposal C.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, Nov 30, 2019 at 03:47:40PM -0500, Sam Hartman wrote:
>
> First, if it does not reset the minimum discussion period, I'd like to
> withdraw proposal C.
I don't think that withdrawing an option changes the minimum
discussion period.
In A.2 it says:
4. The minimum discussion period is c
First, if it does not reset the minimum discussion period, I'd like to
withdraw proposal C.
I think the overlap between Proposal C and F is significant and we have
not identified differences that appear to be important to our community.
I don't plan to make aCFV before Tuesday. Whether even that
13 matches
Mail list logo
