Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposed Ballot

2004-02-29 Thread Remi Vanicat
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi, This is a proposed draft of the ballot for this vote. Comments solicited. manoj ## Voting starts on Sunday, March 7 23:59:59 UTC 2004. Votes must

Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposed Ballot

2004-02-29 Thread Tore Anderson
* Manoj Srivastava This is a proposed draft of the ballot for this vote. Comments solicited. I've got a few nit picks from a quick skim: In the brackets next to your most preferred choice, place a 1. Place a 2 in the brackets next to your next most preferred choice. Do not

Re: keep non-free proposal

2004-02-29 Thread Raul Miller
What I want to know is: why don't you want us distributing such thing? On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 06:52:47PM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote: Because I consider that Debian should not be promoting non-free software, and having them on our ftp servers and, specially, mentioned in our install

Re: keep non-free proposal

2004-02-29 Thread Sam Hartman
Zenaan == Zenaan Harkness [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Zenaan On Sun, 2004-02-29 at 06:44, Raul Miller wrote: Zenaan Is there a possibility for a proposal to be put forward to Zenaan distinguish documentation (and licenses) as not being Zenaan software but instead a unique concept

Re: keep non-free proposal

2004-02-29 Thread Anthony Towns
On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 10:33:42PM -0500, Sam Hartman wrote: Zenaan That for me would be a next logical step after dropping Zenaan non-free. ALast time I checked, we cared about our users and their needs. I bet our users would rather us decide that GFDLed documentation can stay even

Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposed Ballot

2004-02-29 Thread Remi Vanicat
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi, This is a proposed draft of the ballot for this vote. Comments solicited. manoj ## Voting starts on Sunday, March 7 23:59:59 UTC 2004. Votes must

Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposed Ballot

2004-02-29 Thread Tore Anderson
* Manoj Srivastava This is a proposed draft of the ballot for this vote. Comments solicited. I've got a few nit picks from a quick skim: In the brackets next to your most preferred choice, place a 1. Place a 2 in the brackets next to your next most preferred choice. Do not

Re: keep non-free proposal

2004-02-29 Thread Raul Miller
What I want to know is: why don't you want us distributing such thing? On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 06:52:47PM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote: Because I consider that Debian should not be promoting non-free software, and having them on our ftp servers and, specially, mentioned in our install

Re: keep non-free proposal

2004-02-29 Thread Sam Hartman
Zenaan == Zenaan Harkness [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Zenaan On Sun, 2004-02-29 at 06:44, Raul Miller wrote: Zenaan Is there a possibility for a proposal to be put forward to Zenaan distinguish documentation (and licenses) as not being Zenaan software but instead a unique concept