Hi.
I prefer option A from the TC ballot to Matthew's proposal. However, I
think I prefer no vote to a GR on option A. So, I'm going to hold off
to see if Matthew's proposal gets sufficient seconds before doing
anything.
That said, I respect Matthew's proposal. I believe he is positively
In linux.debian.project Ian Jackson ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk wrote:
For me the answer is: We should preserve diversity and freedom of
choice, at the cost of functionality. Making that statement now,
very clearly, will make that doomsday scenario less likely.
We can easily have a GR on
Sam Hartman writes (Willing to propose option A):
I prefer option A from the TC ballot to Matthew's proposal. However, I
think I prefer no vote to a GR on option A. So, I'm going to hold off
to see if Matthew's proposal gets sufficient seconds before doing
anything.
That is a sensible
Hi,
On 03/01/2014 00:45, Matthew Vernon wrote:
2. Loose coupling of init systems
In general, software may not require a specific init system to be
pid 1. The exceptions to this are as follows:
* alternative init system implementations
* special-use packages such as managers
Ansgar Burchardt writes (Re: Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init
systems):
So if someone packages a new init system that is not compatible with
existing init scripts (e.g. if it does not support /etc/init.d/* as a
fallback), then it won't be able to start any service.
This point was
Ian Jackson wrote:
Ansgar Burchardt writes (Re: Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init
systems):
So if someone packages a new init system that is not compatible with
existing init scripts (e.g. if it does not support /etc/init.d/* as a
fallback), then it won't be able to start any
(Apologies if this comes through as HTML: I'm using a mobile.)
On Mar 4, 2014 11:57 PM, Uoti Urpala uoti.urp...@pp1.inet.fi wrote:
The reason why pretty much
everyone is by now either already using systemd or moving to it
Not everyone is, and the point here is that people certainly don't want
On Wed, 2014-03-05 at 00:42 +, Sam Kuper wrote:
On Mar 4, 2014 11:57 PM, Uoti Urpala uoti.urp...@pp1.inet.fi
wrote:
If systemd hegemony becomes a problem, there is a much better
open-source answer: fork systemd.
By saying this, you have outlined the following competing scenarios
for
8 matches
Mail list logo
