Re: Call for vote - Diversity statement for the Debian Project

2012-05-19 Thread Amaya
Francesca Ciceri wrote: Dear Debian Developers, since the minimum discussion period is now over and since no amendments have been proposed, I'm hereby calling for a vote. The Reply-To isn't set. So what email address should my vote be sent to? Thanks, and excuse the silly question. --

Re: Call for vote - Diversity statement for the Debian Project

2012-05-19 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Amaya am...@debian.org (19/05/2012): The Reply-To isn't set. So what email address should my vote be sent to? Thanks, and excuse the silly question. The vote isn't open yet. Wait for a ballot on dda/dv, from the secretary. ;) Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Call for vote - Diversity statement for the Debian Project

2012-05-19 Thread Amaya
Cyril Brulebois wrote: The vote isn't open yet. Wait for a ballot on dda/dv, from the secretary. ;) Heh, I was wondering :) Thx for the quick reply. /me gets another coffee now :) -- .''`.The world breaks everyone, and afterward, some are : :' :strong at the broken places.

(maybe) constitutional amendment: clarification of section 5.1.5

2012-05-19 Thread Wouter Verhelst
Hi all, When I read the constitution so many years ago for the first time, there were some things that stuck, and others that didn't. One of the things that stuck was a particular power of the DPL which I hadn't seen used in, like, forever. And when I wanted to send a private mail to our current

General Resolution: Diversity statement, first call for votes

2012-05-19 Thread Debian Project Secretary - Kurt Roeckx
Hi, This is the first call for votes for the General Resolution about a diversity statement. Voting period starts 00:00:00 UTC on Sunday, May 20th, 2012 Votes must be received by 23:59:59 UTC on Saturday, June 2nd, 2012 The following ballot is for voting on a diversity

Re: (maybe) constitutional amendment: clarification of section 5.1.5

2012-05-19 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Wouter, On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 08:55:39PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: When I read the constitution so many years ago for the first time, there were some things that stuck, and others that didn't. One of the things that stuck was a particular power of the DPL which I hadn't seen used in,

Re: (maybe) constitutional amendment: clarification of section 5.1.5

2012-05-19 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 04:57:56PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: Rejected amendments, i.e. those that result in additional ballot options, do not reset the discussion period. I think they do reset the discussion period when they get accepted (have enough seconds), but I would need to re-read

Re: (maybe) constitutional amendment: clarification of section 5.1.5

2012-05-19 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 02:17:49AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 04:57:56PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: Rejected amendments, i.e. those that result in additional ballot options, do not reset the discussion period. I think they do reset the discussion period when they