Re: DDs with no key in the keyring [was: Please include unique voters in GR graphs]

2019-12-28 Thread Adam Borowski
On Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 06:12:18PM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > Mattia Rizzolo dijo [Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 06:19:27PM +0100]: > > > > i.e. the only accepted "investigation" > > > > method, likewise take a ton of time (and the fairly limited amount of > > > > empathy from the people doing it). > > >

Re: DDs with no key in the keyring [was: Please include unique voters in GR graphs]

2019-12-28 Thread Gunnar Wolf
Mattia Rizzolo dijo [Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 06:19:27PM +0100]: > > > i.e. the only accepted "investigation" > > > method, likewise take a ton of time (and the fairly limited amount of > > > empathy from the people doing it). > > > > You have all my sympathy and respect for doing what you do! :) >

Re: DDs with no key in the keyring [was: Please include unique voters in GR graphs]

2019-12-28 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 06:14:40PM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote: > > Because apparently kicking them out without a proper investigation takes > > time, and the MIA process Looks like I botchered this sentence. This should have read: "because apparently kicking them out without a proper

Re: DDs with no key in the keyring [was: Please include unique voters in GR graphs]

2019-12-28 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 12/28/19 5:52 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 10:08:44PM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote: >> So, this means there's 101 DDs that don't have a GPG key in the keyring? >> Wow, that's a big amount. Do we have an idea of how long these DDs are >> in that state? Why are they still

Re: Please include unique voters in GR graphs

2019-12-28 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 04:44:00PM +, Niels Thykier wrote: > Kurt Roeckx: > > [...] > >> > >> Thanks, that would be great. :) > > > > So I've done it for the current vote, it's on the website now. > > > > > > Kurt > > > > Thanks. :) > > Should the Y-axis label be updated to say "Ballots

Re: DDs with no key in the keyring [was: Please include unique voters in GR graphs]

2019-12-28 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 10:08:44PM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote: > So, this means there's 101 DDs that don't have a GPG key in the keyring? > Wow, that's a big amount. Do we have an idea of how long these DDs are > in that state? Why are they still DDs? Because apparently kicking them out without

General Resolution: init systems and systemd results:

2019-12-28 Thread Debian Project Secretary - Kurt Roeckx
Hi, The results of the General Resolution about init systems and systemd is: Option 2 "B: Systemd but we support exploring alternatives" The details of the results are available at: https://www.debian.org/vote/2019/vote_002 Kurt Roeckx Debian Project Secretary signature.asc Description:

Re: Please include unique voters in GR graphs

2019-12-28 Thread Niels Thykier
Kurt Roeckx: > [...] >> >> Thanks, that would be great. :) > > So I've done it for the current vote, it's on the website now. > > > Kurt > Thanks. :) Should the Y-axis label be updated to say "Ballots / Voters"? Otherwise, it looks as expected. :) Thanks, ~Niels

Re: Please include unique voters in GR graphs

2019-12-28 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 08:26:00AM +, Niels Thykier wrote: > Kurt Roeckx: > > On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 07:56:00AM +, Niels Thykier wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> It seems that GR has a stats/graph page like this: > >> * https://vote.debian.org/~secretary/gr_initsystems/ (ongoing) > >> *

Re: Please include unique voters in GR graphs

2019-12-28 Thread Niels Thykier
Kurt Roeckx: > On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 07:56:00AM +, Niels Thykier wrote: >> Hi, >> >> It seems that GR has a stats/graph page like this: >> * https://vote.debian.org/~secretary/gr_initsystems/ (ongoing) >> * https://www.debian.org/vote/2019/suppl_001_stats (finished) >> >> This includes a