Raphael Hertzog writes:
> I think we should aim at shortening the voting period too, but likely
> not by much. I would make the voting period last at least 9 days (and no
> more than 14) with a requirement to include two week-ends. Then the
> secretary should have some leeway in fixing the start
Bill Allombert writes:
> I do believe reducing the discussion period gives too much head start to
> the proposing parties, by contrast to others developers that may not
> have allocate time to participate in such discussion at this point of
> the time. This is a matter of fairness.
I completely
On Sun, Oct 10, 2021 at 12:01:35PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Having closely followed a bunch of GRs now, my personal impression is that
> almost all of the substantitive discussion happens in the first week.
> Some discussion continues into the second week, and for controversial GRs
> a few
Hi,
thank you Russ for driving this discussion forward. I'm pretty happy
with your proposal.
On Tue, 05 Oct 2021, Russ Allbery wrote:
> I'm somewhat surprised that there has been no discussion of the timing of
> the GR discussion period, which I expected to be more controversial. The
> scheme
4 matches
Mail list logo
