On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 08:59:39AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
I'm not sure we need that. There's an expectation that vacation messages
have a [vac] prefix in the subject, which is mostly followed (although
sometimes people do forget it). That makes it fairly easy to filter them
out for
What are the candidates opinion on the current release process?
Can it be improved? What role should the DPL play in such work?
Thanks - with apologies for raising this at a release-sensitive
time, but obviously it has to be at a vote-appropriate time…
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On 3 Apr 2013, at 17:29, Moray Allan mo...@sermisy.org wrote:
The campaign period already finished a few days ago
Yes, I was aware of that when I posted, but RL interfered with me asking prior
to voting opening. I sought advice as to whether it was appropriate to ask
further Qs and got a
.
--
Jonathan Dowland
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141017090800.ga3...@chew.redmars.org
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 11:16:37AM -0700, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
Do you consider uselessd to be the same init system as systemd? To me
this looks like a legitimate fork.
Albeit one that isn't in the archive; there's an RFP bug[1] but noone
has taken ownership of it / created an ITP.
--
To
in 20141017090800.ga3...@chew.redmars.org
before taking this action.
--
Jonathan Dowland
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141023065258.gd20
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 10:32:00AM +0200, Aigars Mahinovs wrote:
This discussion can end for good in two ways:
* Debian declares that user choice of init systems is important and
applications must respect that;
* Debian declares that only systemd is supported;
The currently GRs appear to be
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 09:46:44AM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
fwiw, as this seems to be a commonish error - you mean could not
care less. People who could care less by definition do care.
It's an en_US thing, I think.
http://public.wsu.edu/~brians/errors/couldcare.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Sun, Nov 09, 2014 at 04:27:21AM +0100, Michael Meskes wrote:
I'd assume he was referring to:
If my GR passes we will only have to have this conversation if those
who are outvoted do not respect the project's collective decision.
If my GR fails I expect a series of bitter rearguard
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 06:05:25PM +1100, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
Debian kFreeBSD looks dead in the water and that won't change whilst so
many DDs are so pro systemd -- I think that systemd was the final nail
in the coffin.
It won't change so long as people don't work on it. In a reply to a
On Sun, Nov 09, 2014 at 12:22:07PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
What's the procedure for removing someone from the technical
committee?
An alternative to picking on one committee member would be to disband
the current committee entirely, with an explicit rider stating that the
action should not
otherwise constructive parts of our community. We are all only
human and sometimes we don't have the emotional energy to deal with that.
-private is, even if it isn't designed to be, a virtual safe space.
--
Jonathan Dowland
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
process soothes this a bit.
I'd love to know what the original GR proposer (Daniel Ruoso) thinks about
this; or the seconders (inc Neil McGovern who is still active at least); I
seem to recall Amaya was involved but I could be remembering wrong.
--
Jonathan Dowland
Please do not CC me, I am subscribed to the list.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
like hardware not having free drivers?
--
Jonathan Dowland
Please do not CC me, I am subscribed to the list.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
son?
"Chair" is not ambiguous if you pay attention to the capitalisation, it's a
proper noun. Therefore there's no need to change it to disambiguate. NACK
--
Jonathan Dowland
Please do not CC me, I am subscribed to the list.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 12:16:22PM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> Except I'm not posting to debian-private, but to debian-vote. Oh,
> silly me.
I wonder if there will be sanctions for this egregious violation of our
privacy and trust ;)
--
Jonathan Dowland
Please do not CC me
ooking.
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Jonathan Dowland
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://jmtd.net
⠈⠳⣄ Please do not CC me, I am subscribed to the list.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Thanks for asking these questions. I'm *really* interested to see how
all the candidates respond (if they do)
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Jonathan Dowland
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://jmtd.net
⠈⠳⣄ Please do not CC me, I am subscribed to the list.
of Debian.
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Jonathan Dowland
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://jmtd.net
⠈⠳⣄ Please do not CC me, I am subscribed to the list.
etc. as appropriate.
(This resolution is a position statement under s4.1(5).)
Seconded.
--
Jonathan Dowland
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
but as far as DebConf is concerned, I wouldn't say it's any more or
less a part of Debian than any other Debian sub-project.
That's great news!
--
Please do not CC me for listmail.
Jonathan Dowland
✎j...@debian.org
https://jmtd.net
ve stopped short of saying "the majority of the people in Donbas
and Crimea do not consider themselves to be part of Ukraine" but if
that's what you are intending to assert then you're going to have to
show some hard evidence.
--
Please do not CC me for listmail.
Jonatha
nation by holding Debconf 2022 there.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but Debconf is not formally a part of Debian,
and so cannot be bound by the outcome of a GR anyway.
--
Please do not CC me for listmail.
Jonathan Dowland
✎j...@debian.org
https://jmtd.net
23 matches
Mail list logo
