Re: Ballot option 2 - Merely hide Identities of Developers Casting a Particular Vote and allow verification

Hi Judit, it might be a bit late for a change now, but at first I had some difficulties parsing the last added sentence in 4.2: Judit Foglszinger writes: > 4.2. Procedure > @@ -228,9 +246,10 @@ earlier can overrule everyone listed later. > >Votes are taken by the Project

Re: Do we want to Handle Secret Ballots in the same GR as Voting Changes

Sam Hartman writes: > new: > 6. Votes are cast in a manner suitable to the Secretary. The >Secretary determines for each poll whether voters can change their >votes. The manner needs to also be suitable to the voters. FTR, I'd also prefer a separate GR.

Re: Proposed GR: Repeal the 2005 vote for declassification of the debian-private mailing list

Bart Martens writes: > Anyone reading something of potential public value on debian-private > can always request the original author for permission to quote in > public. Note that the original author is the only person who can fully > assess how private the message was, since

Re: An ammendment (Re: Formal CFV: General Resolution to Abolish Non-Free)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au writes: I wish to propose an ammendment to the proposed resolution as follows. The text of the resolution should be replaced with a call for the developers to resolve that: