On Sun, 02 Nov 2008, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Hi,
I hereby propose those two alternate options and am asking for seconds.
| Option: Ask the DAM to postpone the changes
|
| The Debian Project, by way of a general resolution of its developers, asks
| the Debian Account Managers to postpone
Le Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 08:58:40AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
On Sun, 02 Nov 2008, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Hi,
I hereby propose those two alternate options and am asking for seconds.
| Option: Ask the DAM to postpone the changes
|
| The Debian Project, by way of a general
Hi!
| Option: Ask the DAM to postpone the changes
|
| The Debian Project, by way of a general resolution of its developers, asks
| the Debian Account Managers to postpone the implementation of the changes
| described on the debian-devel-announce mailing list (Message-id:
| [EMAIL
On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 09:34:47AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 12:18:11AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
I'm fine with voting with only the current option on the ballot, but
that will probably translate in people abstaining because they don't
agree, neither with
-=| Lucas Nussbaum, Sun, Nov 02, 2008 at 03:22:05PM +0100 |=-
I hereby propose those two alternate options and am asking for
seconds.
| Option: Ask the DAM to postpone the changes
|
| The Debian Project, by way of a general resolution of its developers, asks
| the Debian Account Managers
On Sun Nov 02 15:22, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
| Option: Ask the DAM to postpone the changes
|
| The Debian Project, by way of a general resolution of its developers, asks
| the Debian Account Managers to postpone the implementation of the changes
| described on the debian-devel-announce mailing
Le Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 10:04:05AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit :
On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 09:34:47AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
I do not think that the only interpretation of a rejected GR is the
contrary of its option(s). For instance, people can vote Further
Disucssion because
On Sun, Nov 02, 2008 at 03:22:05PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
I hereby propose those two alternate options and am asking for seconds.
| Option: Ask the DAM to postpone the changes
|
| The Debian Project, by way of a general resolution of its developers, asks
| the Debian Account Managers
Hi,
I hereby propose those two alternate options and am asking for seconds.
| Option: Ask the DAM to postpone the changes
|
| The Debian Project, by way of a general resolution of its developers, asks
| the Debian Account Managers to postpone the implementation of the changes
| described on the
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
I hereby propose those two alternate options and am asking for seconds.
To be very blunt and direct: I think your a teensy, weeny bit late with
this. We're currently already working on an alternate proposal. And that
one has gotten a fairly big number of seconds. I really
On 02/11/08 at 22:34 +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
The main question is: does the project think DAM should be allowed to
start implementing the proposal posted to d-d-a, or should the project as
a whole decide on the future direction of the NM process and related
processes. IMO that issue is
Le Sun, Nov 02, 2008 at 10:34:14PM +0100, Frans Pop a écrit :
The main question is: does the project think DAM should be allowed to
start implementing the proposal posted to d-d-a, or should the project as
a whole decide on the future direction of the NM process and related
processes. IMO
12 matches
Mail list logo
