On Fri, 2019-12-06 at 22:50:32 +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> That's 5, I'll update everything.
Thanks for this Kurt! Much appreciated!
Regards,
Guillem
Quoting Kurt Roeckx (2019-12-06 23:06:28)
> On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 10:50:32PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> >
> > That's 5, I'll update everything.
>
> The website should be updated very soon.
Thanks a lot, Kurt!
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45
On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 09:51:50PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> [ Sorry, resending signed this time around. :/ ]
>
> Hi!
>
> Ok, so here's what I'd like (or would have liked) to get into the ballot,
> given the new context after the addition of the combined D+G option. But
> it's not very clear
On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 10:50:32PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>
> That's 5, I'll update everything.
The website should be updated very soon.
Kurt
On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 09:51:50PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> X<
> Title: Reaffirm our commitment to support portability and multiple
> implementations
>
> Principles
> ~~
>
> The Debian project reaffirms its commitment to be the glue that binds
> and integrates different
On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 04:48:48PM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>
> Seconded.
That's 5, I'll update everything.
Kurt
On Friday, December 6, 2019 3:51:50 PM EST Guillem Jover wrote:
> [ Sorry, resending signed this time around. :/ ]
>
> Hi!
>
> Ok, so here's what I'd like (or would have liked) to get into the ballot,
> given the new context after the addition of the combined D+G option. But
> it's not very
> X<
> Title: Reaffirm our commitment to support portability and multiple
> implementations
>
> Principles
> ~~
>
> The Debian project reaffirms its commitment to be the glue that binds
> and integrates different software that provides similar or equivalent
> functionality, with
Hi
On 2019/12/06 22:51, Guillem Jover wrote:
> [ Sorry, resending signed this time around. :/ ]
>
> Hi!
>
> Ok, so here's what I'd like (or would have liked) to get into the ballot,
> given the new context after the addition of the combined D+G option. But
> it's not very clear to me whether
* Guillem Jover: " Option G update [signed] (was Re: Proposal: Reaffirm our
commitment to support portability and multiple implementations)" (Fri, 6 Dec
2019 21:51:50 +0100):
> [ Sorry, resending signed this time around. :/ ]
>
> Hi!
>
> Ok, so here's what I'd like (or would have liked) to
[ Sorry, resending signed this time around. :/ ]
Hi!
Ok, so here's what I'd like (or would have liked) to get into the ballot,
given the new context after the addition of the combined D+G option. But
it's not very clear to me whether this will be acceptable or not to the
Secretary, and what
11 matches
Mail list logo
