On Thu, Mar 08, 2007, Josip Rodin wrote:
How much time do you generally have to read Debian-related e-mail?
How much for the Debian mailing lists?
If you only mean read, reading e-mail is a continuous process for
me and I don't know how much time it sums up to. About half of the
legitimate
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 03:30:18AM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
Hi,
How much time do you generally have to read Debian-related e-mail?
How much for the Debian mailing lists?
I normally expect to read most of my Debian-related mail every day. I
read several of the lists directly in my inbox, and on
Hi,
On Thu, 08 Mar 2007, Josip Rodin wrote:
How much time do you generally have to read Debian-related e-mail?
How much for the Debian mailing lists?
This really depends on my workload and in the interest that I have on the
discussions going on. I have an incoming folder for mails coming to
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 03:30:18AM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
Hi,
How much time do you generally have to read Debian-related e-mail?
Too much :)
How much for the Debian mailing lists?
One hour up to a few hours per day.
How many lists do you follow, and which ones do you pay real
Hi,
How much time do you generally have to read Debian-related e-mail?
How much for the Debian mailing lists?
How many lists do you follow, and which ones do you pay real attention to?
Have you stopped following a Debian mailing list in the past, and if so,
what was the most important/common
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 10:22:54PM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
(all other candidates feel free to answer the questions as well.)
1.) What is your opinion regarding the current status of
debian-volatile?
I just looked it up today. I like the concept a lot.
2.) Do you think this
also sprach Ted Walther [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.03.12.2209 +0100]:
Who is on the current volatile team? They will definitely need to
be Debian Developers.
How do you intend to work with all those hundreds of active
contributors who aren't yet DDs? Will you ignore them?
--
Please do not send
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/12/2006 06:09 PM, Ted Walther wrote:
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 10:22:54PM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
(all other candidates feel free to answer the questions as well.)
1.) What is your opinion regarding the current status of
On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 09:23:37PM -0300, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
wrote:
They will definitely need to be Debian Developers.
With that in mind, you have just kicked me off the Volatile
Team. :-)
Non-DD contributors are important to Debian, and they deserve greater
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 10:22:54PM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
1.) What is your opinion regarding the current status of debian-volatile?
[...]
Please see the bottom of [1] for my opinion.
--Jeroen
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2006/03/msg00211.html
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
1.) What is your opinion regarding the current status of debian-volatile?
... more questions about volatile ...
Wasn't this just asked by Joey?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This one time, at band camp, Martin Zobel-Helas said:
Hi Ari,
On Wednesday, 08 Mar 2006, you wrote:
Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
1.) What is your opinion regarding the current status of debian-volatile?
... more questions about volatile ...
Wasn't this just asked by Joey?
yes, in
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 10:22:54PM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
2.) Do you think this services should be made an official service of the
debian project? Please give a reason for your answer.
I like to think of debian.net as an area where we experiment for things that
might or might not
On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 10:49:26PM +0900, Seo Sanghyeon wrote:
The Debian Free Software Guidelines states that The program must
include source code.
1. How do you define source code yourself?
Any definition of source code, to be useful to the Debian Project in
applying our Free Software
also sprach Jonathan Walther [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.03.06.2352 +0100]:
I am not involved in pornography, gambling, or anything else that
is illegal.
Neither of the first two are illegal. Maybe in your country, but
then you must not forget that Debian is International...
You don't have to
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 10:28:30AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
I'm asking: are there any potential situations in which you would feel
the need to curtail outside activities because they could cast a bad
light on your work as the DPL?
Not at all. All my non-Debian activities are 100% legal,
On Sun, Mar 06, 2005 at 02:15:00PM -0800, Jonathan Walther wrote:
On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 10:49:26PM +0900, Seo Sanghyeon wrote:
1. How do you define source code yourself?
Like pornography, I know source code when I see it. There may be some
edge cases where not everyone agrees what
Jonathan Walther [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 10:28:30AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
I'm asking: are there any potential situations in which you would feel
the need to curtail outside activities because they could cast a bad
light on your work as the DPL?
Not at
Jonathan Walther [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Have the activities of Bomis.com harmed the growth and reputation of the
Wikipedia project? Yet I do nothing even half as controversial.
What is controversial about bomis.com?
Your web site certainly was controversial; the evidence for that is
the
For some reason, I don't seem to have got the first message in this
thread. I'll go looking for it now.
Kenshi Muto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Should we act against political/legal problems as Project?
When there are issues that affect the entire project, then I think it's
right for the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
As far as I read threads, they are mainly focused Project inside.
Yes, they are important issue, but I think one of DPL's work is
a representation to the world as spokesperson.
Debian Project Leader said ... will be respected than any DD's talk
On Sun, Mar 06, 2005 at 05:48:20PM +0900, Kenshi Muto wrote:
Questions:
* Do you think DPL has spokesperson's job?
Absolutely! Every Debian Developer acts as a representative of Debian,
but the DPL is first among equals, so to speak. My skills at writing,
public speaking, and listening to others
Jonathan Walther [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Mar 06, 2005 at 05:48:20PM +0900, Kenshi Muto wrote:
Questions:
* Do you think DPL has spokesperson's job?
Absolutely! Every Debian Developer acts as a representative of Debian,
but the DPL is first among equals, so to speak. My skills at
On Sun, 6 Mar 2005 02:05:16 -0800, Jonathan Walther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(snip) Debian doesn't have
the resources to focus on anything other than making the best GNU/Linux
distribution on the planet.
Therefore, Hurd and/or BSD porters should be damned?
Sorry, couldn't resist.
--
To
On Sun, Mar 06, 2005 at 12:44:44AM +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote:
Am Samstag, den 05.03.2005, 23:11 + schrieb Andrew Suffield:
On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 03:30:14PM +, Henning Makholm wrote:
Indeed, I would be reluctant to vote for any candiate who would commit
to twenty-four
Seo Sanghyeon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. How do you define source code yourself?
I believe that source code is anything that allows us to learn how the
software works and modify it to function in different ways. In almost
all cases, the GPL's preferred form for modification will be source
code
Kenshi Muto wrote:
Questions:
* What do you think about Debian Project acts for political/legal
theme with other projects such as FSF, EFF and so on? (Although
we've already done sometimes.)
* Do you think DPL has spokesperson's job?
Ideally, I think the people explaining what's going on
On Sun, Mar 06, 2005 at 05:48:20PM +0900, Kenshi Muto wrote:
Hi,
As far as I read threads, they are mainly focused Project inside.
Yes, they are important issue, but I think one of DPL's work is
a representation to the world as spokesperson.
This is true and it is an other great application
Seo Sanghyeon wrote:
The Debian Free Software Guidelines states that The program must
include source code.
1. How do you define source code yourself?
It means different things in different contexts; for Debian's purposes
it means the stuff you need to modify then compile to produce the stuff
you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Andreas,
At Sun, 6 Mar 2005 22:11:19 +0100,
Andreas Schuldei wrote:
* What do you think about Debian Project acts for political/legal
theme with other projects such as FSF, EFF and so on? (Although
we've already done sometimes.)
I can
The Debian Free Software Guidelines states that The program must
include source code.
1. How do you define source code yourself?
2. I think that people have different ideas of what source code means.
Do you agree? Are there significant disagreements regarding this
issue within the Debian
Scripsit Seo Sanghyeon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
6. Which of the following satisfies DFSG #2? What is the general
principle? Or should it be case-by-case?
[snip TWENTY-FOUR semi-concrete examples]
However relevant and interesting it would be to get the candidates'
general opinion about the DFSG's
Ha! This gets the official best question so far award. Especially the neural
network bit. That's rich.
On Saturday 05 March 2005 7:49 am, Seo Sanghyeon wrote:
6. Which of the following satisfies DFSG #2? What is the general
principle? Or should it be case-by-case?
* ELF binary without C
On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 03:30:14PM +, Henning Makholm wrote:
Indeed, I would be reluctant to vote for any candiate who would commit
to twenty-four definite answers as part of his campaign, no matter
what the answers were.
Or, for that matter, one who couldn't spot the fairly big hole in
On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 08:16:00AM +0100, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
On Sat, 20 Mar 2004, Daniel Stone wrote:
Coordinating a project the size of Debian requires a very different set
of skills than maintaining a large package, such as glibc.[1]
...or XFree86, the reader is
On Sat, 20 Mar 2004, Daniel Stone wrote:
The XSF is run as a Branden-centric 'team', whereby if someone doesn't
agree with you, they're wrong.
Personally I don't agree with you. An eg. that doesn't touch either you or
me directly:
On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 01:39:51PM +0100, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
On Sat, 20 Mar 2004, Daniel Stone wrote:
Yes, but had I disagreed with Branden, my opinion would've been noted
and very quickly discarded.
I think we are going personal here and i don't like to (since i am sure it
On Sun, 21 Mar 2004, Daniel Stone wrote:
YOU'RE AN IDIOT! CHUTUP MORMON
(That, by the way, was sarcasm.)
lol :-) I would never take that seriously.. not from you at least :P
I don't have any real position on the flames, just on the fact that
Branden is incapable of working with quite a few
On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 11:49:55AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
they're wrong. Where if someone slips up and gets a little
overenthusiastic,
Err, you think that uploading a major new version of a major
package is a slip up?
It seems a bit more deliberate than that to me.
Hamish
--
Hamish
On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 12:58:38PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 11:49:55AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
they're wrong. Where if someone slips up and gets a little
overenthusiastic,
Err, you think that uploading a major new version of a major
package is a slip up?
* Fabio Massimo Di Nitto [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-03-20 07:17]:
On Sat, 20 Mar 2004, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
Especially if that leader's most valuable trait is coordination: the
initiatives are executed by others, while the leader's role is simply in
^^
Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I believe coordination is an active role. The paragraph I quoted
above is from Branden who seems to define coordination in a way that
initiatives are executed by others. Perhaps he can clarify if this
is what he meant to say.
I think it is
On Sat, 20 Mar 2004, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
Especially if that leader's most valuable trait is coordination: the
initiatives are executed by others, while the leader's role is simply in
^^
putting the right people together.
Part of coordination is to
On Sat, 20 Mar 2004, Daniel Stone wrote:
Coordinating a project the size of Debian requires a very different set
of skills than maintaining a large package, such as glibc.[1]
...or XFree86, the reader is surely invited to infer.
The XSF is run as a Branden-centric 'team', whereby
On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 08:16:00AM +0100, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
On Sat, 20 Mar 2004, Daniel Stone wrote:
Coordinating a project the size of Debian requires a very different set
of skills than maintaining a large package, such as glibc.[1]
...or XFree86, the reader is
On Sat, 20 Mar 2004, Daniel Stone wrote:
The XSF is run as a Branden-centric 'team', whereby if someone doesn't
agree with you, they're wrong.
Personally I don't agree with you. An eg. that doesn't touch either you or
me directly:
On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 01:39:51PM +0100, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
On Sat, 20 Mar 2004, Daniel Stone wrote:
Yes, but had I disagreed with Branden, my opinion would've been noted
and very quickly discarded.
I think we are going personal here and i don't like to (since i am sure it
On Sun, 21 Mar 2004, Daniel Stone wrote:
YOU'RE AN IDIOT! CHUTUP MORMON
(That, by the way, was sarcasm.)
lol :-) I would never take that seriously.. not from you at least :P
I don't have any real position on the flames, just on the fact that
Branden is incapable of working with quite a few
On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 11:49:55AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
they're wrong. Where if someone slips up and gets a little
overenthusiastic,
Err, you think that uploading a major new version of a major
package is a slip up?
It seems a bit more deliberate than that to me.
Hamish
--
Hamish
On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 12:58:38PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 11:49:55AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
they're wrong. Where if someone slips up and gets a little
overenthusiastic,
Err, you think that uploading a major new version of a major
package is a slip up?
* Fabio Massimo Di Nitto [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-03-20 07:17]:
On Sat, 20 Mar 2004, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
Especially if that leader's most valuable trait is coordination: the
initiatives are executed by others, while the leader's role is simply in
^^
On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 09:03:17AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
Hi,
Andreas has asked a lot of the questions that I intended to ask as
well, so I only need to amend one question he asked.
Sorry for the delay in replying. Your amended question was a doozy! :)
2a. Do you see the concentration
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 06:10:28PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-03-09 00:57]:
[...]
I certainly hope that people will ask themselves whether I have been
productive as DPL. The following questions you raised are all valid,
and they are questions I
* Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-03-19 18:06]:
I certainly hope that people will ask themselves whether I have been
productive as DPL. The following questions you raised are all valid,
and they are questions I have constantly asked myself throughout the
year in order to measure
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 06:06:27PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 06:10:28PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
I would go a step further and also ask how much Branden has achieved
of what he wrote in his platforms in the last years, and how much of
this has been done by
On Sat, 20 Mar 2004, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
Especially if that leader's most valuable trait is coordination: the
initiatives are executed by others, while the leader's role is simply in
^^
putting the right people together.
Part of coordination is to
On Sat, 20 Mar 2004, Daniel Stone wrote:
Coordinating a project the size of Debian requires a very different set
of skills than maintaining a large package, such as glibc.[1]
...or XFree86, the reader is surely invited to infer.
The XSF is run as a Branden-centric 'team', whereby
On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 09:03:17AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
Hi,
Andreas has asked a lot of the questions that I intended to ask as
well, so I only need to amend one question he asked.
Sorry for the delay in replying. Your amended question was a doozy! :)
2a. Do you see the concentration
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 06:10:28PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-03-09 00:57]:
[...]
I certainly hope that people will ask themselves whether I have been
productive as DPL. The following questions you raised are all valid,
and they are questions I
* Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-03-19 18:06]:
I certainly hope that people will ask themselves whether I have been
productive as DPL. The following questions you raised are all valid,
and they are questions I have constantly asked myself throughout the
year in order to measure
* Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-03-12 13:39]:
But, even more important than individual interactions is energy and
drive.
I can only invite you to look at the work I've done for Debian over
the last years. You'll see a high level of commitment and energy.
Do you feel
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 06:06:27PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 06:10:28PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
I would go a step further and also ask how much Branden has achieved
of what he wrote in his platforms in the last years, and how much of
this has been done by
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 08:05:04PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Raul Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-03-11 13:52]:
But, even more important than individual interactions is energy and
drive.
That's what I'm still trying to figure out about the both of you.
I can only invite you to
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 08:05:04PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Raul Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-03-11 13:52]:
But, even more important than individual interactions is energy and
drive.
That's what I'm still trying to figure out about the both of you.
I can only invite you to
* Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-03-09 00:57]:
In fact, Martin criticized me last year for not having novel ideas:
[..]
Note that he didn't say he thought they were bad ideas; instead he
asserted that I would be ineffective at achieving them.
Yes, and I still assert the same. As I
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 06:10:28PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
Furthermore, partly in line with AJ said, while your communication has
significantly improved, I wonder why it had to improve in the first
place? I have never been known for flamewars, and most people know me
as approachable,
* Raul Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-03-11 13:52]:
But, even more important than individual interactions is energy and
drive.
That's what I'm still trying to figure out about the both of you.
I can only invite you to look at the work I've done for Debian over
the last years. You'll see a
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 08:05:04PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
I can only invite you to look at the work I've done for Debian over
the last years. You'll see a high level of commitment and energy.
I don't doubt that -- I'm definitely ranking you above the default option.
But, I still have
* Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-03-09 00:57]:
In fact, Martin criticized me last year for not having novel ideas:
[..]
Note that he didn't say he thought they were bad ideas; instead he
asserted that I would be ineffective at achieving them.
Yes, and I still assert the same. As I
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 06:10:28PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
Furthermore, partly in line with AJ said, while your communication has
significantly improved, I wonder why it had to improve in the first
place? I have never been known for flamewars, and most people know me
as approachable,
* Raul Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-03-11 13:52]:
But, even more important than individual interactions is energy and
drive.
That's what I'm still trying to figure out about the both of you.
I can only invite you to look at the work I've done for Debian over
the last years. You'll see a
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 08:05:04PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
I can only invite you to look at the work I've done for Debian over
the last years. You'll see a high level of commitment and energy.
I don't doubt that -- I'm definitely ranking you above the default option.
But, I still have
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 10:35:01AM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
Question 1, to Branden and Martin:
Reading over your platforms, I notice that they are very similar. I
don't think this is a bad thing; I happen to agree quite strongly with
both of your assessments of productive roles the DPL
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 10:35:01AM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
Question 1, to Branden and Martin:
Reading over your platforms, I notice that they are very similar. I
don't think this is a bad thing; I happen to agree quite strongly with
both of your assessments of productive roles the DPL
* Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-03-05 08:48]:
I would like to ask what you have done in your past term to find out
overworked core roles, and what happened to ease the work load on
these core roles.
I stay in constant contact with a wide range of people involved in
core team. Just to
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 02:51:08PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
I stay in constant contact with a wide range of people involved in core
team. Just to give two examples, I'm in regular contact with Matt
Zimmerman (security) and Pascal Hakim (listmaster), but the same goes for
other people
Hi Martin,
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 04:03:34AM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
Yes, please see my platform for more details. I will clearly identify
who is overworked and help to find addition man power. I will also
find out if there are other ways to help them carry out their tasks
(for
* Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-03-05 08:48]:
I would like to ask what you have done in your past term to find out
overworked core roles, and what happened to ease the work load on
these core roles.
I stay in constant contact with a wide range of people involved in
core team. Just to
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 02:51:08PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
I stay in constant contact with a wide range of people involved in core
team. Just to give two examples, I'm in regular contact with Matt
Zimmerman (security) and Pascal Hakim (listmaster), but the same goes for
other people
Hi,
Andreas has asked a lot of the questions that I intended to ask as
well, so I only need to amend one question he asked.
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 03:20:16PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
2. Recently we had some flamewars about concentration of power for
some people inside Debian. While
On 2004-03-03 15:46:59 + Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* MJ Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-03-03 08:33]:
It's now over four years since RMS asked -legal for comments on the
FDL. Do DPL candidates think agreement is likely in the next three
months? How much longer should this
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 02:27:17PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
I'm not sure it's fruitful to ground public conclusions (on -vote) on
premises that have to remain private. If nothing else, it leaves
non-Debian-Developers following our election process almost completely
in the dark.
On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 07:49:10AM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
Out of curiosity, do you plan to only formally make the people working
in these departments delegates?
I plan to extend formal delegate status to everyone currently serving in
those roles.
It is possible that one or more of those
* MJ Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-03-04 10:15]:
Additionally, I asked how much longer you think this discussion
should be given before taking further action. For example, is
tagging FDL-caused bugs release-ignore for the next four years
acceptable?
In July last year, I was asked by some
* Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-03-04 06:47]:
I wonder why reviving the CTTE has to wait until you become the
project leader.
The Debian Project Leader is empowered by clause 5.1.6 of the Debian
Constitution[2] to seat and remove members of the Technical
Committee.
The
* Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-03-04 09:03]:
2a. Do you see the concentration of many important roles on a few
people as a problem? As example, I'd like to name DAM, keyring
If they cannot successfully perform their duties, then this is
certainly a problem, yes. See below.
* Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-03-03 10:35]:
Reading over your platforms, I notice that they are very similar. I
don't think this is a bad thing; I happen to agree quite strongly
with both of your assessments of productive roles the DPL can play
in our community.
I think recent
Hi Martin,
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 04:03:34AM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
Yes, please see my platform for more details. I will clearly identify
who is overworked and help to find addition man power. I will also
find out if there are other ways to help them carry out their tasks
(for
Branden Robinson wrote:
I think the following roles should be formally delegated:
FTP Archives
Release Manager
Release Manager for stable
Bug Tracking System
Mailing Lists Administration
Mailing Lists Archives
New Maintainers Front
Hi,
Andreas has asked a lot of the questions that I intended to ask as
well, so I only need to amend one question he asked.
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 03:20:16PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
2. Recently we had some flamewars about concentration of power for
some people inside Debian. While
On 2004-03-03 15:46:59 + Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* MJ Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-03-03 08:33]:
It's now over four years since RMS asked -legal for comments on the
FDL. Do DPL candidates think agreement is likely in the next three
months? How much longer should this
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 02:27:17PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
I'm not sure it's fruitful to ground public conclusions (on -vote) on
premises that have to remain private. If nothing else, it leaves
non-Debian-Developers following our election process almost completely
in the dark.
On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 07:49:10AM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
Out of curiosity, do you plan to only formally make the people working
in these departments delegates?
I plan to extend formal delegate status to everyone currently serving in
those roles.
It is possible that one or more of those
* MJ Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-03-04 10:15]:
Additionally, I asked how much longer you think this discussion
should be given before taking further action. For example, is
tagging FDL-caused bugs release-ignore for the next four years
acceptable?
In July last year, I was asked by some
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-03-03 17:13]:
Has all this talking resulted in even an iota of concrete movement
on the official FSF position? Have there been any real promises
made that there is indeed going to be a change, from hte powers
that be in the FSF? Is there anything solid we can
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 05:12:44PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-03-02 15:20]:
This starts with the fact that he is known to actively maintain a
quite long killfile
For personal mail - not for role accounts.
However, he is widely known to have a
On Wed, 3 Mar 2004, Branden Robinson wrote
[ Sorry if I do not answer right inside the thread but the Reply to
links in the webform do not work as expected and I did not subscribed
to the list. Please CC me, if you want to avoid this.]
I'm not sure I can give you the kind of answer you're
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 06:58:12AM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 05:12:44PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
3. Do you think Debian should continue to support non-free?
No. Debian is about creating a operating system with free software,
and I don't think we should
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 09:37:11AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 05:12:44PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-03-02 15:20]:
This starts with the fact that he is known to actively maintain a
quite long killfile
For personal mail
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 09:37:25AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Wed, 3 Mar 2004, Branden Robinson wrote
[ Sorry if I do not answer right inside the thread but the Reply to
links in the webform do not work as expected and I did not subscribed
to the list. Please CC me, if you want to
1 - 100 of 195 matches
Mail list logo
