Re: Q: NEW process licence requirements

2018-04-03 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 07:57:11AM +0200, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > > > Like it or not, but there *is* a big difference in the project making > > > something available for the big wide world (which a public NEW would > > > be), or a user putting it somewhere readable for everyone even though >

Re: Q: NEW process licence requirements

2018-04-03 Thread Ian Jackson
Chris Lamb writes ("Re: Q: NEW process licence requirements"): > [lots of things] Thank you, Chris, for this absolutely excellent reply. Ian.

Re: Question: What would you like to see {more,less} of?

2018-04-03 Thread Ian Jackson
Chris Lamb writes ("Re: Question: What would you like to see {more,less} of?"): > Dear Enrico, > > I wouldn't want the DPL to express their opinion with the expectation > > that everyone should agree or follow their lead, but more with the idea > > of giving a sense of direction I agree very much

Re: Q: NEW process licence requirements

2018-04-03 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 11:30:23AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Sun, Apr 1, 2018 at 6:11 AM, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > What is the big (legal) difference between distributing something > > from the Debian group on the Debian machine salsa.debian.org, and > > distributing the same from a different

Re: Vote status

2018-04-03 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 02:20:13AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > The vote is running, you can send the emails. You will not get a > ack about your vote until I can look at what's broken, which will > hopefully be tomorrow evening. If you received an error message, I > can reprocess your email. There