> "Holger" == Holger Levsen writes:
Holger> On Thu, Nov 07Holger> Finally, I don't think it's a good idea
to rush this to a
Holger> vote in 7 days. I'm tempted to mail d-d-a to make people who
Holger> are not regularily read -vote aware of this
Holger> discussion. (There are also many people who don't read
Holger> -devel.) Sam, I'd appreciate if I wouldn't need to do that,
Holger> because you sent such a short pointer to -vote on d-d-a
I think you may be mishearing what I'm proposing for a timeline.
I'm proposing seven days of collecting entirely informal comments; that
can be extended if there are still significant open issues. Then,
starting a formal process. Assuming no extensions, that means two weeks
of discussion and amendments, followed by two weeks of vote.
The secretary will send mail to d-d-a when the formal discussion period
starts. I don't plan to send mail to d-d-a before that, but if someone
feels this needs more exposure on d-d-a now then by all means send a
quick note.
I don't have the power to call for a vote in 7 days, and agree with you
that doing so even if I could would be a bad idea.
