Re: Python buildd (was Re: let me help you with progressing bikesheds)

2018-03-27 Thread Philipp Kern
On 2018-03-27 14:29, Wookey wrote: On 2018-03-22 22:31 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: On 2018-03-07 12:08, Hector Oron wrote: > 2018-03-07 12:01 GMT+01:00 Philipp Kern : To do more tests I agree that we should deploy it on more buildds. For *this phase*, I believe enabling

Re: Python buildd (was Re: let me help you with progressing bikesheds)

2018-03-27 Thread Wookey
On 2018-03-22 22:31 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On 2018-03-07 12:08, Hector Oron wrote: > > 2018-03-07 12:01 GMT+01:00 Philipp Kern : > To do more tests I agree that we should deploy it on more buildds. For > *this phase*, I believe enabling lingering and deploying it by hand

Re: Python buildd (was Re: let me help you with progressing bikesheds)

2018-03-27 Thread Philipp Kern
On 27.03.2018 09:22, Julien Cristau wrote: > On 03/22/2018 10:31 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote: >> To do more tests I agree that we should deploy it on more buildds. For >> *this phase*, I believe enabling lingering and deploying it by hand is >> the best. Is it something acceptable? >> > Sounds ok to

Re: Python buildd (was Re: let me help you with progressing bikesheds)

2018-03-27 Thread Julien Cristau
On 03/27/2018 09:35 AM, Philipp Kern wrote: > That all said: I'm happy to brainstorm and to implement proposed > solutions. Right now that seems to require more infrastructural changes > though and I'd rather focus on getting rid of buildd itself first. > That's fair. Cheers, Julien

Re: Python buildd (was Re: let me help you with progressing bikesheds)

2018-03-27 Thread Julien Cristau
On 03/22/2018 10:31 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > To do more tests I agree that we should deploy it on more buildds. For > *this phase*, I believe enabling lingering and deploying it by hand is > the best. Is it something acceptable? > Sounds ok to me, though I'd prefer if the buildd user (as in