On 07/12/2018 20:45, Dr. Tobias Quathamer wrote: > Am 04.12.2018 um 12:28 schrieb Emilio Pozuelo Monfort: >> On 03/12/2018 23:10, Dr. Tobias Quathamer wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> the build of golang-1.11 has failed on mipsel, most likely due to a >>> flaky test. Could you please retry the package? >>> >>> gb golang-1.11_1.11.2-2 . mipsel >> >> Given back. It may take a while for the build to be tried as the mipsel >> queue is >> somewhat large. > > Hi, > > thanks for trying again, the build now succeeded. However, there's a > similar strange build failure on mips64el. Could you please give the > package back on mips64el? > > gb golang-1.11_1.11.2-2 . mips64el
You may want to do a test build on a porterbox and investigate those failures, and possibly disable the flaky tests if it's a problem in the tests and not in the code. > Also, rclone failed on mipsel. That also seems to need a give back. > > gb rclone_1.45-1 . mipsel There was a new upload and it has built this time. > Are you aware of any issues with the mipsel and mips64el buildds? It > seems odd that those buildds randomly fail at different tests. Or is > this a problem with golang on those arches? AFAIR some buildds lack an FPU, but that should only slow down the builds, but not fail them due to different FP precision. So I guess you will have to reproduce them in a porterbox and investigate. Cheers, Emilio