On 9/2/2019 9:06 PM, Clint Adams wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 06:40:24PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
>> I would prefer JSON as an input format, looking roughly like this:
>>
>> [{"pkg": "haskell-active", "ver": "0.2.0.13-6", "archs": ["mipsel",
>> "mips64el"], "suite": "sid", "reason":
On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 06:40:24PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> I would prefer JSON as an input format, looking roughly like this:
>
> [{"pkg": "haskell-active", "ver": "0.2.0.13-6", "archs": ["mipsel",
> "mips64el"], "suite": "sid", "reason": "semigroupoids changed from 5.2.2 to
> 5.3.2"}]
On 2019-09-02 11:03, Joachim Breitner wrote:
Am Montag, den 02.09.2019, 10:57 +0200 schrieb Philipp Kern:
FWIW, I started working on this. Unfortunately we do not really have
transactions available to schedule all or nothing. If someone has a
creative idea on how to best signal back partial
Fix the Go team mailing list address.
(pkg-go-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org -> debian...@lists.debian.org)
On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 11:03:56AM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Montag, den 02.09.2019, 10:57 +0200 schrieb Philipp Kern:
> > FWIW, I started working on this.
Hi,
Am Montag, den 02.09.2019, 10:57 +0200 schrieb Philipp Kern:
> FWIW, I started working on this. Unfortunately we do not really have
> transactions available to schedule all or nothing. If someone has a
> creative idea on how to best signal back partial success, let me know.
> :)
>
> (My
On 2019-09-02 10:33, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 29/08/2019 12:08, Philipp Kern wrote:
On 2019-08-29 11:46, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 29/08/2019 11:17, Philipp Kern wrote:
On 2019-08-29 11:14, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Why don't you let the interested teams run the scripts and
On 29/08/2019 12:08, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On 2019-08-29 11:46, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 29/08/2019 11:17, Philipp Kern wrote:
>>> On 2019-08-29 11:14, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Why don't you let the interested teams run the scripts and generate the
required
binNMUs
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 12:08PM, Philipp Kern wrote:
> So that together with the other mail of not making it automatic: Would we
> just want to have an endpoint you can call as a member of an approved
> team(?) that ingests a list of work items, processes it and archives it?
> Assuming that
On 2019-08-29 11:46, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 29/08/2019 11:17, Philipp Kern wrote:
On 2019-08-29 11:14, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Why don't you let the interested teams run the scripts and generate
the required
binNMUs (like they do now), and then you pull that from a cronjob in
On 29/08/2019 11:17, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On 2019-08-29 11:14, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> Why don't you let the interested teams run the scripts and generate the
>> required
>> binNMUs (like they do now), and then you pull that from a cronjob in wuiet
>> and
>> schedule the binNMUs? You
On 2019-08-29 11:14, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Why don't you let the interested teams run the scripts and generate the
required
binNMUs (like they do now), and then you pull that from a cronjob in
wuiet and
schedule the binNMUs? You would just need to define the format and do
some
sanity
11 matches
Mail list logo
