On 04/05/16 11:22, Santiago Vila wrote:
>>> The link, when it's present, is supposed to match the actual build
>>> which happened for the installed binaries. If they do not match it
>>> would be better not to have a link at all.
>>
>> We don't have any way to match the actual build with the binary
On 2016-05-04 00:46, Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 12:31:43AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > On 2016-05-04 00:13, Santiago Vila wrote:
> >
> > > This page
> > >
> > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=protobuf
> > >
> > > makes me to believe that the Arch: all
On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 12:31:43AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On 2016-05-04 00:13, Santiago Vila wrote:
>
> > This page
> >
> > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=protobuf
> >
> > makes me to believe that the Arch: all autobuilder successfully built
> > the protobuf package, but
On 2016-05-04 00:13, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Hello.
Hi,
> This page
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=protobuf
>
> makes me to believe that the Arch: all autobuilder successfully built
> the protobuf package, but if I click in the link I see this:
It actually says that the
