Not sure why e2fsprogs is BD-uninstallable on amd64?

2018-02-09 Thread Theodore Ts'o
Hi, At the moment, according to buildd dashboard for e2fsprogs[1], the package is uninstallable on amd64, kfreebsd-amd64, and kfreebsdi396. [1] https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=e2fsprogs The reason cited is: e2fsprogs depends on missing: - e2fslibs:amd64 (= 1.43.8-2) However,

Re: Not sure why e2fsprogs is BD-uninstallable on amd64?

2018-02-09 Thread Philipp Kern
On 09.02.2018 19:56, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > At the moment, according to buildd dashboard for e2fsprogs[1], the package > is uninstallable on amd64, kfreebsd-amd64, and kfreebsdi396. > > [1] https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=e2fsprogs > > The reason cited is: > > e2fsprogs depends

Re: Not sure why e2fsprogs is BD-uninstallable on amd64?

2018-02-09 Thread Theodore Ts'o
On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 11:05:42PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote: > That was a red flag to me. It's still in unstable: > > > e2fslibs | 1.43.7-1 | unstable | kfreebsd-amd64, > > kfreebsd-i386 > > e2fslibs | 1.43.8-2 | unstable | amd64, arm64, armel, > >

Re: Not sure why e2fsprogs is BD-uninstallable on amd64?

2018-02-09 Thread Bastian Blank
On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 11:18:25PM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > Thanks! It didn't occur to me this could be a problem, but it's > definitely what's going on: > > https://packages.debian.org/unstable/e2fslibs > > How do I request removal of these cruft arch-specific packages? File > a bug