Re: Bug#894441: dpkg-buildpackage: SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH must ignore bin-nmu changelog entries. Breaks M-A:same

Guillem Jover writes ("Re: Bug#894441: dpkg-buildpackage: SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH must ignore bin-nmu changelog entries. Breaks M-A:same"): > On Fri, 2018-04-13 at 19:01:08 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > > AIUI binNMUs are now coinstallable ? And that is why > > I think I mig

Re: Bug#894441: dpkg-buildpackage: SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH must ignore bin-nmu changelog entries. Breaks M-A:same

On Fri, 2018-04-13 at 19:01:08 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 05:43:58PM +0200, Jean-Michel Vourgère wrote: > > > So, during compilation: > > > SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH must ignore bin-nmu changelog entries > > > because it breaks Multi-Arch:same on bin-nmu. > > > > > > During

Re: Bug#894441: dpkg-buildpackage: SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH must ignore bin-nmu changelog entries. Breaks M-A:same

> On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 05:43:58PM +0200, Jean-Michel Vourgère wrote: > > So, during compilation: > > SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH must ignore bin-nmu changelog entries > > because it breaks Multi-Arch:same on bin-nmu. > > > > During dpkg-deb (: > > SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH must *not* ignore bin-nmu changelog

Re: Bug#894441: dpkg-buildpackage: SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH must ignore bin-nmu changelog entries. Breaks M-A:same

reassign -1 ftp.debian.org thanks On 2018-04-12 22:29, Aurelien Jarno wrote: On 2018-04-12 19:41, Holger Levsen wrote: control: retitle -1 "buildd.d.o: binNMUs should be replaced by easy no-change-except-d/changelog-uploads" # I hope this is correct, realistic and accurate ;) # if not, please

Re: Bug#894441: dpkg-buildpackage: SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH must ignore bin-nmu changelog entries. Breaks M-A:same

On 2018-04-12 19:41, Holger Levsen wrote: > control: retitle -1 "buildd.d.o: binNMUs should be replaced by easy > no-change-except-d/changelog-uploads" > # I hope this is correct, realistic and accurate ;) > # if not, please fixup? > #thanks That can't be done on the wanna-build side, uploads to

Re: Bug#894441: dpkg-buildpackage: SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH must ignore bin-nmu changelog entries. Breaks M-A:same

On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 10:09:44PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 12/04/18 21:41, Holger Levsen wrote: > > control: retitle -1 "buildd.d.o: binNMUs should be replaced by easy > > no-change-except-d/changelog-uploads" > > # I hope this is correct, realistic and accurate ;) > > # if not,

Re: Bug#894441: dpkg-buildpackage: SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH must ignore bin-nmu changelog entries. Breaks M-A:same

On 12/04/18 21:41, Holger Levsen wrote: > control: retitle -1 "buildd.d.o: binNMUs should be replaced by easy > no-change-except-d/changelog-uploads" > # I hope this is correct, realistic and accurate ;) > # if not, please fixup? > #thanks Removing binNMUs would be a problem whenever we need to

Re: Bug#894441: dpkg-buildpackage: SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH must ignore bin-nmu changelog entries. Breaks M-A:same

control: retitle -1 "buildd.d.o: binNMUs should be replaced by easy no-change-except-d/changelog-uploads" # I hope this is correct, realistic and accurate ;) # if not, please fixup? #thanks -- cheers, Holger signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Bug#894441: dpkg-buildpackage: SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH must ignore bin-nmu changelog entries. Breaks M-A:same

On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 02:10:37PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > Please, see my reply at . This is > really a fundamental problem with binNMUs+multiarch-refcounting or how > they are being issued. :) FWIW I totally agree with what you wrote there, just that I

Re: Bug#894441: dpkg-buildpackage: SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH must ignore bin-nmu changelog entries. Breaks M-A:same

Control: severity -1 wishlist On 04/12/2018 02:10 PM, Guillem Jover wrote: Control: reassign -1 buildd.debian.org Hi! On Thu, 2018-04-05 at 17:43:58 +0200, Jean-Michel Vourgère wrote: On Friday, 30 March 2018 15:02:31 CEST Chris Lamb wrote: [

Re: Bug#894441: dpkg-buildpackage: SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH must ignore bin-nmu changelog entries. Breaks M-A:same

Control: reassign -1 buildd.debian.org Hi! On Thu, 2018-04-05 at 17:43:58 +0200, Jean-Michel Vourgère wrote: > On Friday, 30 March 2018 15:02:31 CEST Chris Lamb wrote: > > [ https://lists.debian.org/debian-security/2017/05/msg00011.html ] > > On Friday, 30 March 2018 20:15:33 CEST Sven Joachim

Re: Bug#894441: dpkg-buildpackage: SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH must ignore bin-nmu changelog entries. Breaks M-A:same

On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 05:43:58PM +0200, Jean-Michel Vourgère wrote: > So, during compilation: > SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH must ignore bin-nmu changelog entries > because it breaks Multi-Arch:same on bin-nmu. > > During dpkg-deb (: > SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH must *not* ignore bin-nmu changelog entries >

Re: Bug#894441: dpkg-buildpackage: SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH must ignore bin-nmu changelog entries. Breaks M-A:same

On Friday, 30 March 2018 15:02:31 CEST Chris Lamb wrote: > [ https://lists.debian.org/debian-security/2017/05/msg00011.html ] On Friday, 30 March 2018 20:15:33 CEST Sven Joachim wrote: > [ https://bugs.debian.org/843773 ] Thanks a lot guys for pointing out that issue! Basically, when doing

Re: Bug#894441: dpkg-buildpackage: SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH must ignore bin-nmu changelog entries. Breaks M-A:same

On 2018-03-30 15:02 +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: > [adding 894441@ to CC] > > Hi Jean-Michel, > >> Filled as #894441 >> https://bugs.debian.org/894441 > > Thanks for this. I was just briefly wondering whether this is related to: > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-security/2017/05/msg00011.html It