Hello Era,
Any progess on this?
Thanks,
Ardo
era eriksson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I've exchanged email with Ardo van Rangelrooij, the previous
maintainer, and I'm fortunate to report that he says he is happy to
sponsor me.
He also mentions that the previous upstream appears to be dead,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 279522 ITA: thttpd -- Support utilities for thttpd
Bug#279522: O: thttpd -- Support utilities for thttpd
Changed Bug title.
--
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 250414 ITA: Lisp Universal Shell
Bug#250414: O: lush -- Lisp Universal Shell
Changed Bug title.
--
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
On Thu, 02 Dec 2004, Charles Fry wrote:
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 05:59:09PM -0500, Charles Fry wrote:
In what ways is this package different to, say, dirvish, which I use
in a manner which is, AFAICS, identical to the way this package
operates?
glastree provides a subset of
Ashley T. Howes wrote:
lavaps is already part of the Debian archive. In a wishlist bug report
(#243328), a TCL/TK version was asked for. I now intend to create one.
All the information relating to the new package is the same as the
original, but I include it here again for reference.
Does
Hello, I have packaged daapd, a daemon that scans a directory of mp3 files
and shares them on the local network via the Apple DAA protocol. Together
with mdnsresponder (a Depends:) this makes your library available to
iTunes. You can also do fun tricks like forward the daapd ports over ssh
and
Your message dated Fri, 03 Dec 2004 13:42:53 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#278627: close, wrong email address
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 12:30:33PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 12:03:34PM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
autofs needs VERY urgent cares in order to have it working properly
in sarge. Do you need help to adopt it currently? There are a few
patches already
Your message dated Fri, 03 Dec 2004 14:09:07 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#278630: close, wrong email adress
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 09:31:32AM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 03:04:15PM -0500, Charles Fry wrote:
The poor man's daily snapshot, glastree builds live backup trees, with
branches for each day. Users directly browse the past to recover older
documents or retrieve
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 01:49:44PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
The advantage of using glastree over pdumpfs is that it is implemented
in Perl rather than Ruby (this is in fact the reason that I encountered
it in the first place).
How is that an advantage of use?
One may want to use tools
In what ways is this package different to, say, dirvish, which I use
in a manner which is, AFAICS, identical to the way this package
operates?
Or storebackup?
(Actually, storebackup's one-line description doesn't really hint at
this functionality. But I'm using it to create daily
Well, if one had a small system and desired not to install ruby, it
would still be possible to obtain pdumpfs' functionality. Of course
that could be called an installation issue rather than a usability
issue.
3314kB, including pdumpfs itself. I'll donate a 32MB USB key to store it
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 01:53:34PM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
I'm collecting a few hints and patches in BTS, as well as contacting
reports for clarifications and information. I could upload
s/reports/reporters/ :)
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: ossim
Version : 0.9.7
Upstream Author : OSSIM development team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.ossim.net/
* License : BSD-style
Description : security information manager
A framework for
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
merge 223568 283282
Bug#223568: RFP: hotbabe -- erotic graphical system activity monitor
Bug#283282: RFP: hot-babe -- system activity monitor
Merged 223568 283282.
merge 283282 283578
Bug#283282: RFP: hot-babe -- system activity monitor
Bug#283578:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Package name: mpegdemux
Version : 0.1.2
Upstream Author : Hampa Hug
URL : http://www.hampa.ch/mpegdemux/
License : GPL version 2
Description: a MPEG1/2 system stream demultiplexer
Mpegdemux is an MPEG1/MPEG2 system stream
chgrep package uploaded to mentors.debian.net
Hope this'll help.
Cheers,
--
Olivier LEMAIRE, aka LEM
http://olivier-lemaire.org/
libapache-mod-ntlm uploaded to mentors.debian.net
Hope this'll help.
Cheers,
--
Olivier LEMAIRE, aka LEM
http://olivier-lemaire.org/
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Package name: courier-analog
Version: 0.12
Upstream Author: Sam Varshavchik
URL: http://www.courier-mta.org
License: GPLv2
Description:
Courier-analog generates log summaries for incoming
and outgoing SMTP connections, and IMAP and POP3 activity.
.
Santiago Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Package name: mpegdemux
Version : 0.1.2
Upstream Author : Hampa Hug
URL : http://www.hampa.ch/mpegdemux/
License : GPL version 2
Description: a MPEG1/2 system stream demultiplexer
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 07:17:45PM -0500, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
Matthew Palmer wrote:
The advantage of using glastree over pdumpfs is that it is implemented
in Perl rather than Ruby (this is in fact the reason that I encountered
it in the first place).
How is that an advantage of
Matthew Palmer wrote:
The advantage of using glastree over pdumpfs is that it is implemented
in Perl rather than Ruby (this is in fact the reason that I encountered
it in the first place).
How is that an advantage of use?
We're talking about free software. Modifying it to fit your needs is
It looks like an interesting package,
Shaun---potentially an important package.
* Package name: newlib
Version : 1.12.0.20041126
Upstream Author : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://sources.redhat.com/newlib/
* License : GPL, LGPL, BSD, and others
I'm building a rekall package now and will upload it to experimental in
the next few days unless someone objects.
Matthew Palmer wrote:
Sounds like you need to expand your repertoire a bit.
Possibly so, but unfortunately my time is a finite. There are far too
many languages (even in debian main) for me to learn them all.
Can you imagine a world in which your argument was taken at face value?
There
Hi all again.
El Domingo, 21 de Noviembre de 2004 16:01, Alejandro Exojo escribió:
I can start working on it again if you want, and merge you last package
with the mine one (with the last upstream version, of course). If Joerg or
Frank aren't interested in a permanent sponsorship, I can ask
Are you aware of toolchain-source-newlib?
Considering that newlib is targetted to embedded systems, what is the
advantage of having binary compiled version of newlib while there is
already a package of newlib source integrating with toolchain-source?
Seo Sanghyeon
28 matches
Mail list logo
