Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Well, then
retitle 494849 ITP: libauthcas-perl -- Client library for CAS 2.0
Bug#494849: RFP: libauthcas-perl -- Client library for CAS 2.0
Changed Bug title to `ITP: libauthcas-perl -- Client library for CAS 2.0'
from `RFP: libauthcas-perl --
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
unblock 494849 by 495429
Bug#495429: ITP: libauthcas-perl -- Client library for CAS 2.0
Bug#494849: ITP: libauthcas-perl -- Client library for CAS 2.0
Was blocked by: 495429
Blocking bugs of 494849 removed: 495429
merge 494849 495429
Bug#494849: ITP:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# OK, OK
owner 494849 !
Bug 494849 [wnpp] ITP: libauthcas-perl -- Client library for CAS 2.0
Owner recorded as Olivier Berger [EMAIL PROTECTED].
merge 494849 495429
Bug#494849: ITP: libauthcas-perl -- Client library for CAS 2.0
Bug#495429: ITP:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Daniel Kahn Gillmor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: libfaketime
Version : 0.7
Upstream Author : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL :
The libfaketime LD_PRELOAD hack would be really useful to me for
writing a test suite for some time-sensitive code. However, packaging
it as a library seems a little bit weird. I'm tempted to package it
instead as a simple binary package called faketime, by analogy with
fakeroot and fakechroot.
Am Tuesday, 19. August 2008 schrieb Debian Bug Tracking System:
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
which was filed against the wnpp package:
#471822: RFA: php-fpdf -- PHP class to generate PDF files
It has been closed by Alessandro De Zorzi [EMAIL PROTECTED].
Their
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
libfaketime intercepts various system calls which programs use to
retrieve the current date and time. It can then report faked dates and
times (as specified by you, the user) to these programs. This means
you can modify the system time a program
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Tue Aug 19 08:03:18 UTC 2008
# Tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW
# http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
#
# Source package in NEW: libsearch-estraier-perl
tags 494666 + pending
Bug#494666: ITP: libsearch-estraier-perl --
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 488396 ITA: wallpaper-tray -- wallpaper changing utility for GNOME
Bug#488396: RFA: wallpaper-tray -- wallpaper changing utility for GNOME
Changed Bug title to `ITA: wallpaper-tray -- wallpaper changing utility for
GNOME' from `RFA:
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Dude, do you understand what RFA means? It does not mean, hijack this
package when you feel like it. Please undo this damage forthwith.
Sorry if I did something wrong, was not my intention.
Probabily I confused RFA with O.
I hope this do not close the door for me
Hey folks,
* 2008-08-19 09:26, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Am Tuesday, 19. August 2008 schrieb Debian Bug Tracking System:
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
which was filed against the wnpp package:
#471822: RFA: php-fpdf -- PHP class to generate PDF files
It
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 02:13:44AM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
* Package name: libfaketime
Description : report faked system time to programs
There is already another package in Debian that provides similar functionality:
datefudge. Perhaps you can get both upstreams to merge
Am Tuesday, 19. August 2008 schrieb Fabio Tranchitella:
Hey folks,
* 2008-08-19 09:26, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Am Tuesday, 19. August 2008 schrieb Debian Bug Tracking System:
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
which was filed against the wnpp package:
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 12:37:10PM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
- There is currently a release freeze, which means that no new
packages, least of all completely new upstream versions, should be
uploaded.
Not really. I don't think you can intepret [1] in that way.
[1]
owner 484217 !
thanks
No answers in the last 20 days, I assume you are not interested anymore, owning
this ITP.
Giuseppe Iuculano
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
owner 484217 !
Bug 484217 [wnpp] ITP: arpon -- Arp handler inspectiON
Bug 492922 [wnpp] ITP: arpon -- arp handler inspection
Owner changed from Sebastian Castillo Builes [EMAIL PROTECTED] to Giuseppe
Iuculano [EMAIL PROTECTED].
Owner changed from
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Cristian Greco [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: fatrat
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Lubos Dolezel lubos at dolezel.info
* URL : http://fatrat.dolezel.info
* License : GPLv2 only
Programming Lang: C++
Description
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reopen 471822
Bug#471822: RFA: php-fpdf -- PHP class to generate PDF files
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
you may need to use 'found' to remove fixed versions.
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
thanks
reopen 471822
thanks
* 2008-08-19 11:54, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Do you want me to upload the old version of the package with a new epoch,
put you back as a maintainer, retitle the bug from RFA to ITA, do again the
upload with a new epoch?
I ask that you upload the old version of the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
owner 488396 !
Bug 488396 [wnpp] ITA: wallpaper-tray -- wallpaper changing utility for GNOME
Owner recorded as Guido Loupias [EMAIL PROTECTED].
thank you
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Your message dated Tue, 19 Aug 2008 16:21:15 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line RFH: gnat-4.1 -- help needed with bug triaging
has caused the Debian Bug report #475369,
regarding RFH: gnat-4.1 -- help needed with bug triaging
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sandro Tosi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: python-progressbar
Version : 2.2
Upstream Author : Nilton Volpato
* URL : http://pypi.python.org/pypi/progressbar
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: Python
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: heirloom-toolchest
* URL : http://heirloom.sourceforge.net/
* License : BSD and other
Programming Lang: C
Description : Old Unix-utilities modified for todays requirements
The Heirloom Project provides
(CC'ing upstream for both datefudge and libfaketime)
This is in reference to my proposal to package libfaketime for debian,
found here:
http://bugs.debian.org/495630
On Tue 2008-08-19 03:27:47 -0400, Peter Palfrader wrote:
How does this differ from datefudge?
On Tue 2008-08-19 05:41:31
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Deng Xiyue [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: pangomm
Version : 2.13.7
Upstream Author : Murray Cumming [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.gtkmm.org/
* License : LGPL, GPL
Hi,
Daniel Kahn Gillmor:
libfaketime appears to be capable of intercepting stat() calls while
datefudge is not.
That's been intentional. (One of the uses of datefudge was to test tools
like make, when they run on a file system whose times are skewed.)
And libfaketime is capable of setting
Daniel, Matthias,
admittedly I haven't been aware of datefudge so far; seems to me like
both mini-tools have been developed independent of each other since
around 2003.
From looking at datefudge 1.14 (is that the most recent version?), I'd
claim that libfaketime currently provides a
Sandro Tosi [EMAIL PROTECTED] (19/08/2008):
This library provides a text mode progressbar. This is tipically used
typically.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue 2008-08-19 13:33:06 -0400, Wolfgang Hommel wrote:
Actually, if you could point out in more detail how you'd like
libfaketime to be enhanced, e.g. how the time specification syntax
could be improved from your perspective, I'm certainly interested in
working on that. I didn't find
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Tue Aug 19 20:03:39 UTC 2008
# Tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW
# http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
#
# Source package in NEW: amule-emc
tags 493043 + pending
Bug#493043: ITP: amule-emc -- parser for emulecollection
On Sat, Aug 02, 2008 at 03:40:37AM +0200, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
is it possible upload a new version of procinfo that actually is
procinfo-ng,
Please do so!
Please let me know where is the new package with the changes below
before it's uploaded.
. add closses: #492807, #492780 in the
31 matches
Mail list logo
