Bug#859859: ITP: node-acorn-jsx -- JSX parser based on node-acorn

2017-04-07 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: ro...@debian.org X-Debbugs-CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org * Package name: node-acorn-jsx Version : 3.0.1 Upstream Author : Ingvar Stepanyan * URL : https://github.com/RReverser/acorn-jsx * License : Expat Programming

Bug#859858: ITP: node-retape -- CommonJS test to tape adapter

2017-04-07 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: ro...@debian.org X-Debbugs-CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org * Package name: node-retape Version : 0.0.3 Upstream Author : Irakli Gozalishvili (http://jeditoolkit.com) * URL : https://github.com/Gozala/retape *

Bug#859857: ITP: node-static-eval -- evaluate statically-analyzable expressions

2017-04-07 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: ro...@debian.org X-Debbugs-CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org * Package name: node-static-eval Version : 1.1.1 Upstream Author : James Halliday (http://substack.net) * URL :

Bug#859739: RFP: pm-graph -- performance analysis of boot, suspend, and resume

2017-04-07 Thread Todd Brandt
On Thu, 06 Apr 2017 22:20:04 + Bart Martens wrote: noowner 859739 stop A wnpp bug of type RFP should not have an owner. I understand. I originally tagged it as ITP because I wanted to own it but require a sponsor. If you require a sponsor is ITP even allowed?

Bug#660988: marked as done (RFP: python-tate-bilinear-pairing -- a library for calculating Tate bilinear pairing)

2017-04-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 07 Apr 2017 16:19:58 + with message-id and subject line closing RFP: python-tate-bilinear-pairing -- a library for calculating Tate bilinear pairing has caused the Debian Bug report #660988, regarding RFP:

Bug#798278: marked as done (ITP: node-tape -- tap-producing test harness for node and browsers)

2017-04-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 07 Apr 2017 10:00:10 + with message-id and subject line Bug#798278: fixed in node-tape 4.6.3-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #798278, regarding ITP: node-tape -- tap-producing test harness for node and browsers to be marked as

Bug#857509: marked as done (ITP: retro-gtk -- library for GTK libretro frontends)

2017-04-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 07 Apr 2017 10:00:11 + with message-id and subject line Bug#857509: fixed in retro-gtk 0.10.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #857509, regarding ITP: retro-gtk -- library for GTK libretro frontends to be marked as done. This

Bug#857508: marked as done (ITP: gnome-games-app -- Game browser and launcher for GNOME)

2017-04-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 07 Apr 2017 10:00:10 + with message-id and subject line Bug#857508: fixed in gnome-games-app 3.24.0.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #857508, regarding ITP: gnome-games-app -- Game browser and launcher for GNOME to be marked as

Bug#854509: Any news

2017-04-07 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/Raynos/date-now/issues/3 Blocked by license problem On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 7:32 PM, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > Hi, > > Any news of packaging datenow ? If not I will become owner > bastien

Processed: Re: Any news

2017-04-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > forwarded -1 https://github.com/Raynos/date-now/issues/3 Bug #854509 [wnpp] ITP: node-date-now -- A requirable version of Date.now() Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/Raynos/date-now/issues/3'. -- 854509:

Bug#779043: RFA: gtkpod

2017-04-07 Thread Simon McVittie
On Mon, 23 Feb 2015 at 17:39:34 +0100, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote: > I'm not using an iPod anymore and I'm not going to buy a new one, > so I've lost interest in maintaining this package. Hi, I notice this package is in principle team-maintained. Is there anyone else in the gtkpod maintainers team

Bug#786808: would adequate be still in stretch or thrown out ?

2017-04-07 Thread Axel Beckert
Hi shirish, shirish शिरीष wrote: > couple of weeks back I saw in how-can-i-help that adequate might be > thrown out. Does not seem to be the case anymore. Maybe due to a dependency being RC-buggy for more than a week which got fixed in the meanwhile? P.S.: I'm interested in seeing adequate

Processed: Re: node-tape: team and good news

2017-04-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > owner -1 ! Bug #798278 [wnpp] ITP: node-tape -- tap-producing test harness for node and browsers Owner changed from Lucas Castro to Bastien ROUCARIES . -- 798278:

Bug#798278: node-tape: team and good news

2017-04-07 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
control: owner -1 ! On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 8:47 AM, Ross Gammon wrote: > In my rush yesterday (to not slow down your work on node-resumer), I forgot > to say congratulations on becoming DD :-) > > > > On 05/04/17 09:01, Ross Gammon wrote: >> >> Hi Bastien, >> >> Go for it!

Bug#786808: would adequate be still in stretch or thrown out ?

2017-04-07 Thread shirish शिरीष
Dear all, couple of weeks back I saw in how-can-i-help that adequate might be thrown out. I do not have the skills but I believe it is a nice tool to catch some bugs at installation time itself and I have used it quite a bit. If the tool does go out of the Debian archive, is there any other tool