Processed: bug 1062438 has no owner

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > noowner 1062438 Bug #1062438 [wnpp] RFP: monobit -- tools for working with monochrome bitmap fonts Removed annotation that Bug was owned by Gürkan Myczko . > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. --

Processed: retitle 1062438 to RFP: monobit -- tools for working with monochrome bitmap fonts

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 1062438 RFP: monobit -- tools for working with monochrome bitmap fonts Bug #1062438 [wnpp] ITP: monobit -- tools for working with monochrome bitmap fonts Changed Bug title to 'RFP: monobit -- tools for working with monochrome bitmap

Bug#1063317: O: django-anymail

Package: wnpp Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Control: affects -1 src:django-anymail I'm no longer interested in the package and no one from the Debian Python Team expressed interest in it, so orphaning. I've updated the package to the current upstream and updated

Processed: O: django-anymail

Processing control commands: > affects -1 src:django-anymail Bug #1063317 [wnpp] O: django-anymail Added indication that 1063317 affects src:django-anymail -- 1063317: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063317 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with

Bug#826643: ITP: tn5250j -- A 5250 terminal emulator for the AS/400

It looks like tn5250j has moved to GitHub, .

Bug#1063269: ITP: python-respx -- Utility for mocking out the Python HTTPX and HTTP Core libraries.

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Yogeswaran Umasankar X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, kd8...@gmail.com * Package name: python-respx Version : 0.20.2 Upstream Contact: Jonas Lundberg * URL : https://github.com/lundberg/respx * License :

Bug#1062827: RFP: pydevtool -- CLI dev tools powered by pydoit

On 2024-02-05 18:44, Drew Parsons wrote: building and testing. The scipy team have created pybuild, which uses That should read "The scipy team have created dev.py" of course. (debian created pybuild)

Processed: ITP: qttinysa -- QT Gui for a tiny SA Spectrum Analyser

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 1063230 ITP: qttinysa -- QT Gui for a tiny SA Spectrum Analyser Bug #1063230 [wnpp] ITP: QtTinySA -- QT Gui for a tiny SA Spectrum Analyser Changed Bug title to 'ITP: qttinysa -- QT Gui for a tiny SA Spectrum Analyser' from 'ITP:

Bug#1061541: marked as done (ITP: ruby-redis-client -- redis-client is a simple, low-level, client for Redis 6+.)

Your message dated Mon, 05 Feb 2024 19:00:18 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1061541: fixed in ruby-redis-client 0.19.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1061541, regarding ITP: ruby-redis-client -- redis-client is a simple, low-level, client for Redis 6+. to be marked as done.

Bug#1009125: marked as done (ITP: php-fruitcake-php-cors -- Cross-origin resource sharing library for the Symfony HttpFoundation)

Your message dated Mon, 05 Feb 2024 19:00:18 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1009125: fixed in php-fruitcake-php-cors 1.3.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1009125, regarding ITP: php-fruitcake-php-cors -- Cross-origin resource sharing library for the Symfony HttpFoundation to be

Bug#1063230: ITP: QtTinySA -- QT Gui for a tiny SA Spectrum Analyser

Package: wnpp Severity: whishlist Owner: Patrick Winnertz X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org Package name: qttinysa Version : 0.9.1 Upstream Author : Ian (g4ixt) URL : https://github.com/g4ixt/QtTinySA License : GPL-v3 Programming Lang: Python

Bug#1062827: RFP: pydevtool -- CLI dev tools powered by pydoit

On 2024-02-03 21:07, c.bu...@posteo.jp wrote: I checked upstream README.md. I have no clue what this is. Can someone explain please? Am 03.02.2024 18:05 schrieb dpars...@debian.org: Package: wnpp * Package name: pydevtool * URL : https://github.com/pydoit/pydevtool

Processed: Add bug block information

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 1032204 by 1063094 Bug #1032204 [src:plover] plover: Please upgrade to new version 4.0.0.dev12 1032204 was not blocked by any bugs. 1032204 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 1032204: 1063094 > thanks Stopping processing

Processed: O: python-sparkpost

Processing control commands: > affects -1 src:python-sparkpost Bug #1063171 [wnpp] O: python-sparkpost Added indication that 1063171 affects src:python-sparkpost -- 1063171: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063171 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with

Bug#1063171: O: python-sparkpost

Package: wnpp Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Control: affects -1 src:python-sparkpost I'm no longer interested in the package (it was only packaged to support django-anymail, which is also about to be orphaned). This is an interface to a proprietary mail service.

Bug#1012289: RFH: lintian -- Debian package checker

Le lundi 5 février 2024, 12:42:04 UTC Bill Allombert a écrit : > On Mon, Feb 05, 2024 at 12:28:02PM +0100, Axel Beckert wrote: > > Hi Bill, > > > > Bill Allombert wrote: > > > By the way, what happened to lintian.debian.org ? > > > > Seems as if someone (not me, just noticed it today when > >

Bug#1012289: RFH: lintian -- Debian package checker

On Mon, Feb 05, 2024 at 12:28:02PM +0100, Axel Beckert wrote: > Hi Bill, > > Bill Allombert wrote: > > By the way, what happened to lintian.debian.org ? > > Seems as if someone (not me, just noticed it today when > "private/refresh-data" failed…) pulled the plug on at least the DNS > name.

Bug#1012289: RFH: lintian -- Debian package checker

Hi Bill, Bill Allombert wrote: > By the way, what happened to lintian.debian.org ? Seems as if someone (not me, just noticed it today when "private/refresh-data" failed…) pulled the plug on at least the DNS name. Probably because it hasn't been updated since Felix' try to rewrite it, which AFAIK

Bug#1012289: RFH: lintian -- Debian package checker

On Mon, Feb 05, 2024 at 03:26:29AM +0100, Axel Beckert wrote: > Hi, > > Bastien Roucariès wrote: > > Le dimanche 4 février 2024, 14:02:58 UTC Bill Allombert a écrit : > > > Areyou still available as lintian maintainer ? It sure would need an > > > upload. > > I can > > > > I am doing some pull

Bug#698988: O: nvi - 4.4BSD re-implementation of vi

On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 12:38:07AM +, Stuart Prescott wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: normal > > The maintainer for the "nvi" package has indicated that he is unable to > maintain this package for the time being. I'm marking this package as orphaned > now. If you want to be the new