Hello,
We maintain a Debian blends dedicated to photo and neutron facilities
DebianPAN[1] via a dedicated team on salsa[2]
do not hesitate to tell me in which category[2] you think density-fitness
belongs
cheers
Frederic
[2] https://salsa.debian.org/pan-team
[1]
did you started from here ?
https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/geant4
cheers
Frederic
Hello
did you plan to publish you work on salsa ?
regards,
Frederic
Hello, sorry my email system was badly configured.
Control: owner -1 Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel
why did you close it ?
Control: reopen -1
Hope it is ok now.
Cheers
Fred
Hello Mika,
VEry glade to hear that you decided to integrate bornagain into Debian.
I created a git repository for it under
ssh://git.debian.org/git/debian-science/packages/bornagain.git
do you have an alioth account, and are you already member of the debian-science
team ?
Cheers
Frederic
Hello, just to know if you are planning to update propellor in Debian
Cheers
Fred
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Hello, I am the maintainer of python-scientific
How does this differ from the existing python-netcdf package?
I CC the upstream autor of python-scientific, maybe he can clarify this point
but before a question to the netcdf4-python guyes.
Does netcdf4-python will support python3 ?
@Konrad do
Hello,
during the build, I have this message
writing output... [ 50%] examples
WARNING: LaTeX command 'latex' cannot be run (needed for math display), check
the pngmath_latex setting
writing output... [ 66%] index
maybe it would be nice to install latex to generate the pngmath pictures.
Hello
what about _static/copybutton.js ?
Can't find anything special on this (among other packages only to be
found in python{2.7,3.2}-doc [1]), so I suggest we just leave it out
(contains no copyright info, whatsoever)
look at here and add the same thing in the copyright file.
Hello, here a quick review of all the patches
* dropped docs package (REJECT-FAQ: split this only if it's big)
I think that this patch should be reverted.
The problem if you add the documentation in python-scoop seems to me
problematic when python3-scoop will come.
It is best to my opinion
scoop-doc would be. But I would be tending to python-scoop-doc anyway.
scoop-doc is better to my opinion
I just looked at sphinx and it seems that this is better to use
source-doc (it is neutral
By-the-way: what's your opinion for the dep of the docs package on the
main package, Suggests or
copyright review
I used licensecheck as a starting point
can you look with the upstream to add copyright headers where it is missing
UNKOWN
and it would be nice to have also the copyright in each header.
it seems thaht there is only the license without the copyright statement.
this is not a
You removed the local-options (are you using gbp-buildpackage to build
scoop ?)
Yes. What's this for, useful to keep?
In fact I like when the master branch does not touch the upstream sources.
This is why I use the unapply patches option
this way I have the original sources in the master
Hello, I already started to package it, but I did not intend to maintain it.
I can sponsorize the upload if you need a sponsor.
Did you considede maintaining it under the debian-science umbrella.
I know that it is related to deap, so it is science related :).
Here the debian-science git
sorry, here the right adress
git://anonscm.debian.org/debian-science/packages/scoop.git
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Hello,
when will you upload the new packages ?
I see that the 0.9.4 version is already in the svn ?
cheers
Frédéric
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
No problem, but note that I'm not reviewing FTP NEW queue or are
related to SSM authors in any way, just happen to see the ITP bug by
chance and decided to send you a note just in case :-)
ok, so I contacted the person in charge of CCP4 and here his feedback about ssm
license.
Hi Fred,
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Picca Frederic-Emmanuel pi...@synchrotron-soleil.fr
* Package name: guidata
Version : 1.2.2
Upstream Author : pierre.rayb...@cea.fr pierre.rayb...@cea.fr
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/guidata/
* License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Picca Frederic-Emmanuel pi...@synchrotron-soleil.fr
* Package name: guiqwt
Version : 2.0.4
Upstream Author : pierre.rayb...@cea.fr pierre.rayb...@cea.fr
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/guiqwt/
* License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Picca Frederic-Emmanuel pi...@synchrotron-soleil.fr
* Package name: libhkl
Version : 4.0.0
Upstream Author : Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel pi...@synchrotorn-soleil.fr
* URL : http://repo.or.cz/w/hkl.git
* License : (GPL
20 matches
Mail list logo
