On 04/04/2012 06:01 AM, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
Hi,
According to strace, when running scratch on the latest squeak-vm the
system seems to be waiting forever to several resources that do not
exist:
- /usr/share/icons/DMZ-White/cursors/041870e1c79f7f3e7cc803061830
-
2012/4/5 Amos Blanton a...@scratch.mit.edu:
According to strace, when running scratch on the latest squeak-vm the
system seems to be waiting forever to several resources that do not
exist:
- /usr/share/icons/DMZ-White/cursors/041870e1c79f7f3e7cc803061830
-
I've just found out something that might be a problem:
Scratch Support materials (/Help), sample Media files (/Media), and
sample projects (/Projects), are licensed under the Creative Commons
Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic (CC BY-SA 2.0) license. To view a
copy of this license, visit
No problem. The license will be updated in the next version of the
source package: 1.4.0.5. (Which I will release as soon as I address
other small issues that have come up.)
If you find anything else, let me know.
On 04/05/2012 11:35 AM, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
I've just found out something that
2012/4/5 Amos Blanton a...@scratch.mit.edu:
No problem. The license will be updated in the next version of the source
package: 1.4.0.5. (Which I will release as soon as I address other small
issues that have come up.)
If you find anything else, let me know.
Cool! You're great! :)
Greetings,
2012/3/31 Allison Randal alli...@ubuntu.com:
On 03/30/2012 04:10 PM, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
It works for me with squeak-vm 4.0.3.2202 (squeeze) but when trying to
run it on squeak-vm 4.4.7 (wheezy) I just get a black screen [1] [2]
According to jredrejo, the modification causing this problem
2012/4/4 Benj. Mako Hill m...@debian.org:
I'm pretty sure that the changes to the website make it clear that the
website terms of use and the trademark license are not additional
copyright terms.
I also think that the current text describing the trademark license
make it clear that
2012/4/4 Michael Hanke m...@debian.org:
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 12:08:17PM +0200, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
2012/4/4 Benj. Mako Hill m...@debian.org:
I also think that the current text describing the trademark license
make it clear that re-packaging is fine while using the marks (it
says as much)
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 12:08:17PM +0200, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
2012/4/4 Benj. Mako Hill m...@debian.org:
I also think that the current text describing the trademark license
make it clear that re-packaging is fine while using the marks (it
says as much) so I don't forsee that this will be a
On 04/04/2012 08:18 AM, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
2012/4/4 Michael Hanke m...@debian.org:
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 12:08:17PM +0200, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
2012/4/4 Benj. Mako Hill m...@debian.org:
I also think that
quote who=Michael Hanke date=Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 02:08:14PM +0200
A more fundamental issue could be a potential show stopper. Take a look
at the etoys package -- technically similar, FOSS license, but still in
non-free.
This sounds like confusion. In any case, the FTP masters are a
different
quote who=Amos Blanton date=Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 04:42:22PM -0400
We've made some changes to page that describes the source code on our site,
and also made a minor update to a license file in the source package, all
based on suggestions from Mako Hill and friends from the free software
Hi Allison, Miry -
We've made some changes to page that describes the source code on our site,
and also made a minor update to a license file in the source package, all
based on suggestions from Mako Hill and friends from the free software
community.
http://info.scratch.mit.edu/Source_Code
I
2012/3/30 Allison Randal alli...@ubuntu.com:
From the Ubuntu side, my only question is how far along are the changes
to run on the Ubuntu squeak packages instead of bundling a version of
the squeak VM in the scratch packages? I see the work mainly around
revisions 78-79 in the scratch
On 03/30/2012 04:10 PM, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
It works for me with squeak-vm 4.0.3.2202 (squeeze) but when trying to
run it on squeak-vm 4.4.7 (wheezy) I just get a black screen [1] [2]
According to jredrejo, the modification causing this problem might be
related to the changes made to the
2012/3/28 Amos Blanton a...@scratch.mit.edu:
The Scratch Team has re-released the Scratch 1.4 source code under the GPL
v2.
This is great news! :)
On 03/28/2012 01:34 PM, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
Yay! I'm going to package it for Debian
Double-check on the DFSG and the Scratch trademark policy.
On 03/28/2012 10:35 PM, Allison Randal wrote:
Double-check on the DFSG and the Scratch trademark policy. The code
itself will be fine under the DFSG, but the trademark policy may not
satisfy The license must allow modifications and derived works, and
must allow them to be distributed under the
17 matches
Mail list logo
