Yes exactly.
In fact, it seems it's not such a good idea to create a new package, but
Daniel Baumann agreed to include it (with nvidia) in the package
linux-modules-nonfree. To definitely include it, he is just waiting for
the Fglrx maintainer team to rename the source package as fglrx-source
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 11:01:13PM +0200, Bertrand Marc wrote:
> Of course module-assistant is a good method... but not for everybody.
> The average Debian user doesn't compile his own kernel. Therefore he has
> the right to claim for a module already compiled for his kernel.
>
> I don't know wh
Of course module-assistant is a good method... but not for everybody.
The average Debian user doesn't compile his own kernel. Therefore he has
the right to claim for a module already compiled for his kernel.
I don't know what you are saying about the ATI blob. I just want to
compile the packag
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 05:11:30AM +0200, Bertrand Marc wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Bertrand Marc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * Package name: fglrx-kernel-modules
> Version : 1:8-4-1
> Upstream Author : ATI/AMD
> * URL : http://ati.amd.com/support/
Bertrand Marc wrote:
> I'm sorry, I knew this link. I was talking about the SVN. There is no
> link on the PTS to the SVN. That's not important anyway.
well, it is in the svn. but that version hasn't yet been uploaded as
it's waiting for nvidia (or if fglrx is ready earlier, then for that).
> So
Daniel Baumann a écrit :
it is, see http://packages.qa.debian.org/linux-modules-nonfree-2.6
I'm sorry, I knew this link. I was talking about the SVN. There is no
link on the PTS to the SVN. That's not important anyway.
So I guess we have to change the name of the module source. I'm waiting
On Sun, 2008-04-20 at 05:11 +0200, Bertrand Marc wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Bertrand Marc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * Package name: fglrx-kernel-modules
> Version : 1:8-4-1
> Upstream Author : ATI/AMD
> * URL : http://ati.amd.com/support/drivers
Bertrand Marc wrote:
> linux-modules-nonfree-2.6 here (and this is not referenced on the PTS):
it is, see http://packages.qa.debian.org/linux-modules-nonfree-2.6
> It is quite ready to upload as an extra package.
i'll have a look to take the necessary parts of it into l-m-n-2.6 then.
> To inclu
Hi,
I'd like to patch this linux-nonfree package. I also see that there is a
linux-modules-nonfree-2.6 here (and this is not referenced on the PTS):
http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/kernel/dists/trunk/linux-modules-nonfree-2.6/debian/?rev=0&sc=0
So first, wich one should be patched?
FYI, here is m
Hi,
Bertrand Marc wrote:
> It is a simple package that provide the fglrx kernel module compiled for
> the last 2.6 kernel found in Debian. It compiles fglrx-kernel-src. There
> would be no need of module-assistant to get (proprietary) 3D
> acceleration working.
an extra package per module source
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Bertrand Marc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: fglrx-kernel-modules
Version : 1:8-4-1
Upstream Author : ATI/AMD
* URL : http://ati.amd.com/support/drivers/linux/linux-radeon.html
* License : restricted
Description
11 matches
Mail list logo
