On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 11:17:59PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 01:02:09PM +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
Yeah, in any case we might want to get this in experimental/unstable so we
get a feeling
how this can be maintained. Also having this beast NEWed is
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 01:02:09PM +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
Yeah, in any case we might want to get this in experimental/unstable so we
get a feeling
how this can be maintained. Also having this beast NEWed is probably a good
start ;).
It's in Debian unstable since half a year:
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 10:41:50PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 07:07:01PM +0200, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
Il 22/04/2010 12:25, Stefano Zacchiroli ha scritto:
Regarding security issues, I duly notice that Giuseppe is a full member
of the Debian security team,
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 03:14:43PM +0200, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
Preliminary i386/amd64 Debian packages can be found here:
http://people.debian.org/~iuculano/chromium/
Wonderful!, thanks.
I'll given them a try and report any problem.
(You might want to sign the .dsc though, so that people
Hi,
Il 23/04/2010 22:55, Stefano Zacchiroli ha scritto:
That's great news guys, I'm really looking forward for chromium browser
in unstable ... and if you need a beta tester, ping me :-)
Preliminary i386/amd64 Debian packages can be found here:
http://people.debian.org/~iuculano/chromium/
Il 26/04/2010 15:58, Stefano Zacchiroli ha scritto:
(You might want to sign the .dsc though, so that people can have a trust
path to the .deb-s.)
Signed, thanks!
Cheers,
Giuseppe.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 07:07:01PM +0200, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
Il 22/04/2010 12:25, Stefano Zacchiroli ha scritto:
Regarding security issues, I duly notice that Giuseppe is a full member
of the Debian security team, so I believe we should trust his
judgement
on that.
webkit
Hello
Thanks for adding gyp into sid so far.
Many Debian users prefers to use Google Chrome repository.
I'm not sure many Debian users prefer to use non-debian repositories. For
me and our users it's definitely not the case, we prefer to use
Debian repositories exclusively, and our own where
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 11:03:47PM +0300, Fathi Boudra wrote:
We are already tracking[1] chromium security issues, this is another
webkit fork and it is a real pain; but given the fact that now we have
three members in the webkit security groups (Fathi is one of them), from
the Security
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 12:49:29PM +0200, Gürkan Sengün wrote:
Hello
Thanks for adding gyp into sid so far.
Many Debian users prefers to use Google Chrome repository.
I'm not sure many Debian users prefer to use non-debian repositories. For
me and our users it's definitely not the
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 01:42:35PM +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
BTW, yesterday I uploaded gyp.
Thanks and already accepted (interesting to see some packages can go fast ;)
I guess nothing prevent to upload a package to experimental now.
OK, I will make this happen over weekend. Will
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 4:28 AM, Alexander Sack wrote:
The problem is that chromium browser cannot be maintained in a debian
stable relase as it is. If you think different talk to me on IRC.
Let's wait how bad it blows up once ubuntu lucid enters stable release mode.
Just for the
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 03:12:56AM +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
Is there a specific reason why you (Chromium team) uploaded
chromium-browser in Ubuntu two months ago and not yet in Debian?
I don't received any answer, so I'm going to take over this ITP in order
to get chromium-browser in
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 01:10:12PM +0300, Fathi Boudra wrote:
*possibility* of getting the package in squeeze. That means having it in
unstable first, then we'll use the usual rules for transition to testing
of all other packages.
or experimental.
Yup, exactly, with the added benefit that
webkit related security issues are real and I'm well placed to know about it.
oups, I mean chromium here :)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 12:51 PM, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
Hi Giuseppe, many thanks for your offer, personally I'd like you to go
ahead with your packaging work on chromium-browser to at least have the
*possibility* of getting the package in squeeze. That means having it in
unstable first,
Il 22/04/2010 12:25, Stefano Zacchiroli ha scritto:
Regarding security issues, I duly notice that Giuseppe is a full member
of the Debian security team, so I believe we should trust his judgement
on that.
webkit related security issues are real and I'm well placed to know about
it.
I
We are already tracking[1] chromium security issues, this is another
webkit fork and it is a real pain; but given the fact that now we have
three members in the webkit security groups (Fathi is one of them), from
the Security team's (CCed) point of view there is no objections.
good to know.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
owner 520324 !
Bug #520324 [wnpp] ITP: chromium-browser -- A web browser developed by Google
based on the WebKit engine
Bug #537228 [wnpp] RFP: google-chrome -- Web browser
Owner changed from a...@debian.org to Giuseppe Iuculano
owner 520324 !
thanks
Il 27/03/2010 17:14, Giuseppe Iuculano ha scritto:
Hi Alexander,
Il 26/03/2010 12:24, Alexander Sack ha scritto:
Just pull and build the ubuntu package.
Is there a specific reason why you (Chromium team) uploaded
chromium-browser in Ubuntu two months ago and not yet
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
owner 520324 a...@debian.org
Bug #520324 [wnpp] ITP: chromium-browser -- A web browser developed by Google
based on the WebKit engine
Bug #537228 [wnpp] RFP: google-chrome -- Web browser
Owner changed from Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org to
owner 520324 a...@debian.org
thanks
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 10:14:59PM +0200, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
owner 520324 !
thanks
Il 27/03/2010 17:14, Giuseppe Iuculano ha scritto:
Hi Alexander,
Il 26/03/2010 12:24, Alexander Sack ha scritto:
Just pull and build the ubuntu package.
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 03:12:56AM +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 10:14:59PM +0200, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
I don't received any answer, so I'm going to take over this ITP in order
to get chromium-browser in time for squeeze.
I requested an alioth group, feel free
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 05:38:52PM +0100, Fathi Boudra wrote:
Just pull and build the ubuntu package.
Thanks. It seems Ubuntu package doesn't build as is.
gyp doesn't exist in Debian.
timeout is provided by coreutils package.
right ... gyp needs to get in too!! FTA probably could help
Hi Alexander,
Il 26/03/2010 12:24, Alexander Sack ha scritto:
Just pull and build the ubuntu package.
Is there a specific reason why you (Chromium team) uploaded
chromium-browser in Ubuntu two months ago and not yet in Debian?
Cheers,
Giuseppe.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 5:14 PM, Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org wrote:
Is there a specific reason why you (Chromium team) uploaded
chromium-browser in Ubuntu two months ago and not yet in Debian?
just a guess: missing b-d in Debian.
i.e. gyp
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Just pull and build the ubuntu package.
Thanks. It seems Ubuntu package doesn't build as is.
gyp doesn't exist in Debian.
timeout is provided by coreutils package.
Cheers,
Fathi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 10:15:56AM +0100, Fathi Boudra wrote:
Hi,
Could you give us en ETA of the ITP ?
Can we have unofficial packages while waiting for the official upload ?
seconded. Otherwise, you could give us some quick steps to build our
own packages :)
Just pull and build the
Hi,
Could you give us en ETA of the ITP ?
Can we have unofficial packages while waiting for the official upload ?
seconded. Otherwise, you could give us some quick steps to build our
own packages :)
Cheers,
Fathi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
i hope it comes into squeeze, looking forward for this.
/me too
is there anything we can do to help ?
Cheers,
--
Emmanuel Bouthenot
mail: kol...@{openics,debian}.orggpg: 1024D/0x414EC36E
xmpp: kol...@im.openics.org irc: kol...@{freenode,oftc}
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
thanks for the status updates and working on this,
i hope it comes into squeeze, looking forward for this.
guerkan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi Alexander,
I've already packaged libv8-0 (latest 1.3.11 from upstream committed
some days ago to trunk), the package is building fine, lintian clean and
it is waiting for a sponsor (ITP 497701).
Most of the packaging comes from ubuntu but I had to adapt it for Debian;
it is in collab-maint so
32 matches
Mail list logo
