Hi Timo!
On Tue, 05 May 2009 01:02:30 +0200, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote:
Johannes Schauer j.scha...@email.de writes:
the Debian package version should be 20090503.gitb5eb5f79-1.
Please don't package this version. It has a known regression that is
being worked on:
Hi Enrico!
On Mon, 04 May 2009 21:01:42 +0200, Enrico Zini wrote:
On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 04:37:48PM +0200, Luca Capello wrote:
I named it 0.1.0 due to the fact that there are no tags yet in the
upstream git repository.
This is wrong, sorry, because it will conflict if upstream will
Luca Capello l...@pca.it writes:
commit 9491d818583114e429db1330dc5e07b4668dfa35
Author: Lars-Peter Clausen l...@metafoo.de
Date: Tue May 5 01:07:10 2009 +0200
Only waiting for the cmdq engine to be finished when dispatching the queue
causes visual artifactes sometimes.
Hi Timo!
On Tue, 12 May 2009 23:14:51 +0200, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote:
Luca Capello l...@pca.it writes:
commit 9491d818583114e429db1330dc5e07b4668dfa35
[...]
Can you confirm/deny that the above fixes your problem?
This fixes
#2281 xf86-video-glamo/0f03b39435910: odd graphical artifacts
Hi Enrico!
On Tue, 12 May 2009 22:40:48 +0200, Luca Capello wrote:
On Mon, 04 May 2009 21:01:42 +0200, Enrico Zini wrote:
How about 0~20090503.gitb5eb5f79-1, so it can go to 0.1 if upstream
eventually decides to start making releases?
Good point, I will do like you suggested, thanks!
There
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Luca!
I build a preliminary package for xf86-video-glamo.
I named it 0.1.0 due to the fact that there are no tags yet in the
upstream git repository.
I build the orig.tar.gz from git revision
b8b594393cb85c7c940f22456036d45e598d344e and did
Johannes Schauer j.scha...@email.de writes:
I build the orig.tar.gz from git revision
b8b594393cb85c7c940f22456036d45e598d344e and did `autoreconf -i` on the
source.
I can't find that git revision:
$ git clone git://git.openmoko.org/git/xf86-video-glamo.git
$ cd xf86-video-glamo
$ git log |
tags 520955 + patch
thanks
Hi Johannes!
Quickly reply, before the package reaches a too much wider audience.
On Mon, 04 May 2009 15:58:08 +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote:
I build a preliminary package for xf86-video-glamo.
Thank you!
I named it 0.1.0 due to the fact that there are no tags yet
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 520955 + patch
Bug#520955: ITP: xserver-xorg-video-glamo -- X.Org X server -- SMedia Glamo
display driver
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hey Luca!
thanks for your quick reply
Luca Capello wrote:
OK, based on the corresponding commit
http://git.openmoko.org/?p=xf86-video-glamo.git;a=commit;h=b5eb5f79245bebe7857a4857dda996f82fecf5e5
the Debian package version should be
On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 04:37:48PM +0200, Luca Capello wrote:
I named it 0.1.0 due to the fact that there are no tags yet in the
upstream git repository.
This is wrong, sorry, because it will conflict if upstream will release
a 0.1.0 version. I would prefer something similar to the
Hi,
[ My ISP got blacklisted by SORBS so my original email did not reach
lists.alioth.debian.org -- resending... ]
Johannes Schauer j.scha...@email.de writes:
the Debian package version should be 20090503.gitb5eb5f79-1.
Please don't package this version. It has a known regression that is
being
Package: wnpp
Owner: Luca Capello l...@pca.it
Severity: wishlist
User: pkg-fso-ma...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: package-creation
* Package name: xserver-xorg-video-glamo
Version : MMDD.gitCOMMIT (read below)
Upstream Author : mainly Lars-Peter Clausen l...@metafoo.de
*
Hi Luca,
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 22:35 +0100, Luca Capello wrote:
Package: wnpp
Owner: Luca Capello l...@pca.it
Severity: wishlist
User: pkg-fso-ma...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: package-creation
* Package name: xserver-xorg-video-glamo
Version : MMDD.gitCOMMIT
14 matches
Mail list logo
