Maybe it should not be described as free if it is indeed non-free?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/84ocjd3ejv@sauna.l.org
Hi Timo,
Maybe it should not be described as free if it is indeed non-free?
Well, it is free under some definition of free, but you are right that this
might be misleading. Perhaps freely available would be better?
At any rate, we've uploaded the intial release already, so we'll have to fix
Matthijs Kooijman matth...@stdin.nl writes:
Maybe it should not be described as free if it is indeed non-free?
Well, it is free under some definition of free, but you are right that this
might be misleading. Perhaps freely available would be better?
Freely distributable maybe?
At any rate,
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 02:53:27PM +0200, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote:
Maybe it should not be described as free if it is indeed non-free?
Well, it is free under some definition of free, but you are right that
this might be misleading. Perhaps freely available would be better?
Freely
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Matthijs Kooijman matth...@stdin.nl
* Package name: openttd-opensfx
Version : 0.2.1
Upstream Author : Various
* URL : http://dev.openttdcoop.org/projects/opengfx
* License : Creative Commons Sampling Plus
Description
5 matches
Mail list logo