Hi!
The `mosh` you quote reads
mosh - Mobile shell that supports roaming and intelligent local echo
This is something totaly different from
mosh - fast R6RS Scheme interpreter
which this bug is about.
Additionally I find it highly inappropriate for someone to take a
package name with an
hi Christopher,
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 08:22:22PM +0200, Christoph Egger wrote:
Hi!
The `mosh` you quote reads
mosh - Mobile shell that supports roaming and intelligent local echo
This is something totaly different from
mosh - fast R6RS Scheme interpreter
I propose that the ITP
Hi!
Christine Spang christ...@spang.cc writes:
hi Christopher,
Christoph, please
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 08:22:22PM +0200, Christoph Egger wrote:
Hi!
The `mosh` you quote reads
mosh - Mobile shell that supports roaming and intelligent local echo
This is something totaly different
Christoph Egger christ...@christoph-egger.org writes:
Read Policy 5.1 again
Well right, that's devref, clicked on the wrong link but still
Assuming no one else is already working on your prospective package,
you must then submit a bug report (Section 7.1, “Bug reporting”)
against the
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 09:14:42PM +0200, Christoph Egger wrote:
Christoph, please
My bad---please excuse my brain's autocompletion; Christopher is a much
more common name in the US.
There's a RFS from February
I did miss that. I do suspect that the fact that no one has sponsored
that
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 09:15:47PM +0200, Christoph Egger wrote:
Christoph Egger christ...@christoph-egger.org writes:
Read Policy 5.1 again
Well right, that's devref, clicked on the wrong link but still
Right, the developer's reference isn't policy. Forcing the creation of a
WNPP bug for a
6 matches
Mail list logo
