Bug#645883: ITP #645883 - Under which license you intended to release the Debian packaging of twig

2013-06-20 Thread Daniel Beyer
Hi Guillaume, so far you did not response to my question regarding the license you want to put your original work [1] under. Since Paul based his work on yours, we need a statement from you regarding the licensing. Paul suggested the MIT license [2], which would be fine for me. Do you agree

Bug#645883: ITP #645883 - Under which license you intended to release the Debian packaging of twig

2013-06-20 Thread Guillaume Duhamel
It would be great if you find the time to answer! Sorry for not replying to previous mails :) I don't mind much the licensing terms for my work on Twig package, so if Paul wants MIT, it's ok for me. It's been some time I worked on this package, but at the time I created another repository:

Bug#645883: ITP #645883 - Under which license you intended to release the Debian packaging of twig

2013-06-20 Thread Daniel Beyer
Am Donnerstag, den 20.06.2013, 10:06 +0200 schrieb Guillaume Duhamel: It would be great if you find the time to answer! Sorry for not replying to previous mails :) No problem, thanks a lot for answering this one! I don't mind much the licensing terms for my work on Twig package, so if

Bug#645883: ITP #645883 - Under which license you intended to release the Debian packaging of twig

2013-06-13 Thread Daniel Beyer
Hi Paul, hi Guillaume, there is some source regarding the Debian packaging of twig at: https://github.com/pwaring/twig-debian Under which license you intended to release the source involved in the packaging? If you unsure, I suggest either using the GPL-3+ (which means the GNU General Public

Bug#645883: ITP #645883 - Under which license you intended to release the Debian packaging of twig

2013-06-13 Thread Paul Waring
On 13/06/13 20:18, Daniel Beyer wrote: Hi Paul, hi Guillaume, there is some source regarding the Debian packaging of twig at: https://github.com/pwaring/twig-debian Under which license you intended to release the source involved in the packaging? If you unsure, I suggest either using the