hi,
i recently got upset when i got error messages like this:
/Repos/slowmoVideo/src/slowmoVideo/lib/ffmpegEncode_sV.c:110: undefined
reference to `avformat_alloc_output_context2'
while compiling great opensource stuff which didn't have a debian package.
it's not all about the ffmpeg binary,
FLOSS software and linux distros in particular are as successful as
they are because of the separation between developers and
distro-packagers.
Disputes and disagreements will happen from time to time. However
when debian takes a side and goes to the extent of using a name for a
hostile fork, it
Hi,
We really want to use ffmpeg instead of libav.
Please return ffmpeg to us.
Thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Bug #731919 is another example why ffmpeg in Debian would be good. The
Debian user should not be the damaged third party when there is a
disagreement between upstream maintainer and Debian
Developer/Maintainer.
It is ok when the DD drops the package because of his personal
problems but I would
I support the RFP, too, reasons:
http://git.mplayer2.org/ liked it, but idle for months now, same maintainer as
libav.
Have gone back to MPlayer1 (FFmpeg).
https://git.libav.org/?p=libav.gita=searchh=HEADst=greps=crystalhd, missing,
I support this.
Please bring 'apt-get install ffmpeg' back.
(I manually build ffmpeg on all my boxes.)
-- Peter
(A907 E02F A6E5 0CD2 34CD 20D2 6760 79C5 AC40 DD6B)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Hi.
As I anticipate a lot of discussion and bikeshedding on this bug report, I
am going to preface it with some information. I am including some people
that may be interested parties in the CC'ies.
Motivated by Debian's bug #729147 being closed, by the fact that
7 matches
Mail list logo
