On Jul/24, Ben Hutchings wrote:
If it stays in testing, it will go into the next stable and you then
need to support some arbitrary version for ~3 years.
OK, I initially thought it was the mention about the caveats in the
package's description that led to your request.
About the arbitrary
On Thu, 2014-07-24 at 12:33 +0200, Sébastien Delafond wrote:
On Jul/24, Ben Hutchings wrote:
If it stays in testing, it will go into the next stable and you then
need to support some arbitrary version for ~3 years.
OK, I initially thought it was the mention about the caveats in the
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sebastien Delafond s...@debian.org
Package name: perf-tools
Version : 0.0.1~20140723+git942be0b3
Upstream Author : Brendan Gregg
* URL : https://github.com/brendangregg/perf-tools
* License : GPL-2
Programming Lang:
On Wed, 2014-07-23 at 21:32 +0200, Sebastien Delafond wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sebastien Delafond s...@debian.org
Package name: perf-tools
Please choose a different name so that it won't be mistaken for
linux-tools. Perhaps 'perf-tools-unstable'.
Version
On Jul/23, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Package name: perf-tools
Please choose a different name so that it won't be mistaken for
linux-tools. Perhaps 'perf-tools-unstable'.
Sure, I can do that: I'll re-upload it to NEW with another name.
Many of these tools employ workarounds so that
On Wed, 2014-07-23 at 23:28 +0200, Sébastien Delafond wrote:
On Jul/23, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Package name: perf-tools
Please choose a different name so that it won't be mistaken for
linux-tools. Perhaps 'perf-tools-unstable'.
Sure, I can do that: I'll re-upload it to NEW with
6 matches
Mail list logo
