Great to hear! I’ll try and take a stab at it as soon as I can.
> On May 19, 2016, at 8:09 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2016-05-19 at 07:52 -0700, Stephen Gelman wrote:
>> Do I need to file an ITP for each one?
>
> AIUI, yes, I was hoping pkg-go-maintainers might be
On Thu, 2016-05-19 at 07:52 -0700, Stephen Gelman wrote:
> Do I need to file an ITP for each one?
AIUI, yes, I was hoping pkg-go-maintainers might be able to advice but
it seems I (and I pressume, you) cannot post there (subscribers ony I
guess).
Good news is that it looks like about half the
Ian,
As it stands the package currently vendors its dependencies so they currently
need to be split out into separate packages. I haven’t confirmed recently, but
last I checked none of them were in Debian already. The package is also a few
versions behind of upstream but that should be
Hi Stephen,
On Fri, 2015-07-10 at 19:35 -0500, Stephen Gelman wrote:
We are just about to start using git-lfs at work so I was wondering
what the status of this ITP is? Looks like the RFS in #793171 was
stalled due to the vendoring.
I've taken the liberty of also CCing the go packaging team.
On Fri, 10 Jul 2015 22:29:44 + Stephen Gelman wrote:
> Programming Lang: Golang
I'd put in a plug here for maintaining this in the pkg-go team! We've
got a pretty decent group going now of folks helping package Go
applications and dependencies that I think git-lfs could
Hi Stephen,
I just look at your work in git-lfs. The package looks pretty well.
However, I found some issues:
1. The license header of certain files are not Expat. You can use
licensecheck in devscripts to check license header. You can also
install cme and use "cme fix dpkg-control" to
Hi Stephen! I'm excited to see this land in Debian.
I'm curious if you know if there a free software backend that is compatible
with the git-lfs protocol. If so, that'd be great to see in Debian as well
one day.
If not, if I understand Policy correctly, you would need to take care to
set the
Github provides a reference implementation:
https://github.com/github/lfs-test-server
https://github.com/github/lfs-test-server
I believe that qualifies it to go in main. In addition the API is open source.
On Jul 10, 2015, at 6:27 PM, Asheesh Laroia ashe...@asheesh.org wrote:
Hi Stephen!
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stephen Gelman ssgelm+debian...@gmail.com
* Package name: git-lfs
Version : 0.5.2
Upstream Author : Github
* URL : http://git-lfs.github.com/
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Golang
Description : Git Large File
9 matches
Mail list logo