Bug#792096: borg packaging: Update

Hello everyone, borgbackup-0.27.0-1 has been packaged and uploaded, and is in the [new] queue. The package is being maintained in collab-maint, all extra repositories and branches on collab-maint or github have been deleted. Since python3-setuptools-scm will behave differently when called in a

Bug#792096: borg packaging

Hi Marc! the problem is the metadata :) you can see the thread here https://github.com/borgbackup/borg/pull/290 HTH G. Il Giovedì 22 Ottobre 2015 17:57, Marc Haber ha scritto: On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 01:13:55AM -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote: > On 2015-10-06

Bug#792096: borg packaging

On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 01:13:55AM -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote: > On 2015-10-06 00:12:19, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > > Hi, Danny has finally got accepted in collab-maint > > (I forgot that a signed mail was needed for the join). > > > > In the next few days I had many other Debian activities

Bug#792096: borg packaging

On 2015-10-06 00:12:19, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hi, Danny has finally got accepted in collab-maint > (I forgot that a signed mail was needed for the join). > > In the next few days I had many other Debian activities that kept > myself away from this bug, but I guess we will close it soon.

Bug#792096: borg packaging

Hi folks, So what's holding up the package now? I understand Mark's position, and I don't think the team's efforts should be distracted at this stage. :) Please keep going! The msgpack package was updated, so I am not sure why this is not pushed ahead now! Cheers, A. signature.asc

Bug#792096: borg packaging

Hi, Danny has finally got accepted in collab-maint (I forgot that a signed mail was needed for the join). In the next few days I had many other Debian activities that kept myself away from this bug, but I guess we will close it soon. cheers! G. Il Martedì 6 Ottobre 2015 2:06, anarcat

Bug#792096: borg packaging

Hello everyone, I was surprised to see the reaction my comments generated and like Gianfranco, I also want to ask Marc to consider rethinking his decision. I do not think you are spoiling the fun or that insisting on oldfashioned keeping is a bad thing. I apologize that my choice of words made

Bug#792096: borg packaging

Hi Danny, On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 01:12:11PM +0200, Danny Edel wrote: > I was surprised to see the reaction my comments generated and like > Gianfranco, I also want to ask Marc to consider rethinking his decision. > I do not think you are spoiling the fun or that insisting on > oldfashioned

Bug#792096: borg packaging

Hi Marc, first, sorry for have messed up your repository, I tried to fix it, but you forgot to push the pristine tar branch and my branch was different (different hash because of different commit id and timestamp) please assume good faith, I tried to fix, but I failed because of wrong

Bug#792096: borg packaging

On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 09:24:27AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > first, sorry for have messed up your repository, I tried to fix it, but you > forgot to push > the pristine tar branch and my branch was different (different hash because > of different commit id and timestamp) > > please

Bug#792096: borg packaging

On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 11:05:14AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > I pushed pristine-tar and upstream branches, for the updated 0.24.0 release, > and > I pushed my debian packaging into master-new. Was this intended to be merged into master? If so, I did something wrong:

Bug#792096: borg packaging

Hi Marc, I'm afraid having a different upstream/pristine-tar messed up things. even if the tarball is the same, git fails to see a common history. I did create a new repository http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/borgbackup-new.git (for some reasons your repo has the wrong permission

Bug#792096: borg packaging

On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 04:28:48PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > I'm afraid having a different upstream/pristine-tar messed up things. > even if the tarball is the same, git fails to see a common history. I have neve had such issues when maintaining Debian packages. > I did create a new

Bug#792096: borg packaging

Hi, Sure you can join! Do you have access to collab-maint? https://wiki.debian.org/Alioth/PackagingProject I'm a uploading-DD, so yes :) I offered a debdiff for msgpack package, and tweak a little bit borgbackup package. I pushed pristine-tar and upstream branches, for the updated

Bug#792096: borg packaging

On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 12:04:02PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: Am I in? Sure you can join! Do you have access to collab-maint? https://wiki.debian.org/Alioth/PackagingProject Do you need a sponsor to upload a package? Marc, do you want to setup a more detailed packaging team? Others