Bug#798278: node-tape ITPs with different owners

Hi Lucas, On 11/22/2016 08:33 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote: > When you package node-tape everyone will be happy. :-) I think the last required dependencies of tape went into the NEW queue yesterday, so we should be ready to go soon. Let me know if you need any help. Regards, Ross signature.asc

Bug#798278: node-tape ITPs with different owners

Control: owner -1 Lucas Castro On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 04:56:55PM -0300, Lucas Castro wrote: > I'm so sorry doing that, > > I've not noticed that already had a ITP for that one, > > I'm working on another node-* packages too. > I'll be more careful. When you package

Processed: Re: Bug#798278: node-tape ITPs with different owners

Processing control commands: > owner -1 Lucas Castro Bug #798278 [wnpp] ITP: node-tape -- tap-producing test harness for node and browsers Owner changed from Ross Gammon to Lucas Castro . -- 798278:

Bug#798278: node-tape ITPs with different owners

I'm so sorry doing that, I've not noticed that already had a ITP for that one, I'm working on another node-* packages too. I'll be more careful. -- Lucas Castro On 29-10-2016 08:38, Ross Gammon wrote: > Hi Adrian & Lucas, > > I have been working on and off packaging the dependencies for >

Bug#798278: node-tape ITPs with different owners

Hi Adrian & Lucas, I have been working on and off packaging the dependencies for node-tape and browserify and kosmtik for a while now. From my point of view, there are so many Node modules that need packaging that I don't mind someone else helping out. So whoever gets there first (for

Bug#798278: node-tape ITPs with different owners

Control: forcemerge -1 842327 Hi Ross, hi Lucas, you both submitted ITPs for node-tape. Please coordinate and agree who will package node-tape. Thanks Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many