Bug#819811: ITP: leiningen

For those that have been waiting for updates on this, I realize I have mostly been sending updates to pkg-clojure-maintainers, so let me also comment directly on the bug! I have preliminary packaging that builds up at https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-clojure/leiningen-clojure.git/ Hopefully

Bug#819811: ITP: leiningen -- simple build system for Clojure

All, We are getting very close! I have completed packaging for the three outstanding blocking bugs: - #862233: use maven 3.5.0 and upgrade to pomegranate 0.4.0-alpha1 https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-clojure/pomegranate-clojure.git/ -- this one is complicated, wanted a few more eyes

Bug#819811: ITP: leiningen -- simple build system for Clojure

I mentioned this on IRC, but also wanted to send a message out to the bug list for posterity... I've hit a bit of a snag with the libpomegranate-clojure packaging (#852246). While I did get the package to build, it doesn't actually work. I realized it relies on maven 3.0.4, which is only

Bug#819811: ITP: leiningen -- simple build system for Clojure

Owner: Elana Hashman Hi all, Phil has done a bunch of great work significantly reducing the dependency profile of leiningen, so I have updated all the blocking issues and we are down to 8. Of those, two are addressed by packages sitting in NEW and I will have more to

Bug#819811: ITP: leiningen -- simple build system for Clojure

All the first-degree dependencies should now be marked as blocking. Now for some packaging... There are a lot of deps and granddeps so if you're interested in helping out, please feel free to claim one (or many)! - e

Bug#819811: ITP: leiningen -- simple build system for Clojure

Elana Hashman writes: > Should I also go ahead and file RFPs for the missing packages for > visibility? Sure! Thanks! --Tom

Bug#819811: ITP: leiningen -- simple build system for Clojure

On 2017-01-19 16:12, Tom Marble wrote: I've created a new page on the Debian wiki for this purpose: https://wiki.debian.org/Clojure/Leiningen Thanks for the great work on the wiki page, Tom, Phil! I've gone ahead and filed version upgrade requests as blocking this bug for all the packages

Bug#819811: ITP: leiningen -- simple build system for Clojure

Tom Marble writes: > Based on the fabulous work of ehashman and the help of technomancy > I've made some minor reformatting of the "state of packaging leiningen" > below. As everyone knows leiningen is a special case package due to it's signicance to the Clojure ecosystem. As

Bug#819811: ITP: leiningen -- simple build system for Clojure

Based on the fabulous work of ehashman and the help of technomancy I've made some minor reformatting of the "state of packaging leiningen" below. The biggest change is that I'm not calling out transitive deps (on leiningen missing deps). In terms of next steps 1. technomancy is already

Bug#819811: ITP: leiningen -- simple build system for Clojure

> I understand this probably goes against some policies, but I would urge > you to consider removing the search task if including it would add a > significant burden to the job of packaging. If it would help, I will > include a deprecation notice in version 2.7.2 of Leiningen recommending >

Bug#819811: ITP: leiningen -- simple build system for Clojure

Elana Hashman writes: > Finally following up with some conversations I had at Clojure/conj, I'd > like to help get the ball rolling on this again. Based on leiningen > 2.7.1's dependencies, here's what we'll need to package/upgrade to make > this happen. Very exciting;

Bug#819811: ITP: leiningen -- simple build system for Clojure

Elana Hashman writes: > Finally following up with some conversations I had at Clojure/conj, I'd > like to help get the ball rolling on this again. Based on leiningen > 2.7.1's dependencies, here's what we'll need to package/upgrade to make > this happen. Awesome, thank

Bug#819811: ITP: leiningen -- simple build system for Clojure

Hello! Finally following up with some conversations I had at Clojure/conj, I'd like to help get the ball rolling on this again. Based on leiningen 2.7.1's dependencies, here's what we'll need to package/upgrade to make this happen. Packages that have a higher version in Debian unstable

Bug#819811: ITP: leiningen -- simple build system for Clojure

On Sat, 2 Apr 2016 23:06:58 +0800 ChangZhuo Chen =?utf-8?B?KOmZs+aYjOWArCk=?= wrote: [...] > * Package name: leiningen [...] > The package was once in Debian, and I plan to bring it back. Hello ChangZhuoChen, Any new on this? I don't know anything about Clojure and

Bug#819811: ITP: leiningen -- simple build system for Clojure

On Sun, Apr 03, 2016 at 02:52:52PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > Please note the additional steps required when reintroducing packages > that were in Debian before: > > https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#reintroducing-pkgs Thanks for the hint. Look like the package

Bug#819811: ITP: leiningen -- simple build system for Clojure

On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 11:06 PM, ChangZhuo Chen wrote: > The package was once in Debian, and I plan to bring it back. > > [0] https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/leiningen Please note the additional steps required when reintroducing packages that were in Debian before:

Bug#819811: ITP: leiningen -- simple build system for Clojure

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬)" * Package name: leiningen Version : 2.6.1 Upstream Author : Phil Hagelberg, Alex Osborne, Dan Larkin, * URL : https://github.com/technomancy/leiningen * License : EPL-1.0