Bug#829046: pagure dependencies (JavaScript libraries) packaged

On Saturday, December 24 2016, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On ഞായര്‍ 25 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 12:01 രാവിലെ, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: >> Yep, I did it before building pagure. > > It is failing here on sbuild as well. OK, managed to reproduce it here. -- Sergio GPG key ID: 237A 54B1 0287 28BF 00EF 31F4

Bug#829046: pagure dependencies (JavaScript libraries) packaged

On ഞായര്‍ 25 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 12:01 രാവിലെ, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > Yep, I did it before building pagure. It is failing here on sbuild as well. aviau, can you try to build it? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#829046: pagure dependencies (JavaScript libraries) packaged

On ശനി 24 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 11:58 വൈകു, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > Hm, strange. I'm using pbuilder/cowdancer to build the package, so it > should catch this. I'll look into it. Did you update pbuilder recently? You have to run 'pbuilder update' often. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP

Bug#829046: pagure dependencies (JavaScript libraries) packaged

On Saturday, December 24 2016, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On ശനി 24 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 11:58 വൈകു, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: >> Hm, strange. I'm using pbuilder/cowdancer to build the package, so it >> should catch this. I'll look into it. > > Did you update pbuilder recently? You have to run

Bug#829046: pagure dependencies (JavaScript libraries) packaged

On Saturday, December 24 2016, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On ശനി 24 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 07:26 വൈകു, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: >> Yep, I forgot :-/. Anyway, pushed now. Sorry about that. > > I'm still getting the same error, > > from html5lib.sanitizer import HTMLSanitizer > ImportError: No module

Bug#829046: pagure dependencies (JavaScript libraries) packaged

On ശനി 24 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 07:26 വൈകു, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > Yep, I forgot :-/. Anyway, pushed now. Sorry about that. I'm still getting the same error, from html5lib.sanitizer import HTMLSanitizer ImportError: No module named sanitizer I don't see either python-bleach or python-html5lib

Bug#829046: pagure dependencies (JavaScript libraries) packaged

On Saturday, December 24 2016, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On ശനി 24 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 11:37 രാവിലെ, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: >> Well, I've done some tests here and I think I have a package that >> builds. I've updated pagure to an intermediary version, 2.6, and the >> package builds fine on

Bug#829046: pagure dependencies (JavaScript libraries) packaged

On ശനി 24 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 11:37 രാവിലെ, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > Right, that's nice indeed, but it demands work anyway... But it's > really good that grunt and gulp are now available. Exploding dependencies in new releases is not pagure specific issue. Its there for every web app, be it

Bug#829046: pagure dependencies (JavaScript libraries) packaged

On ശനി 24 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 11:37 രാവിലെ, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > Well, I've done some tests here and I think I have a package that > builds. I've updated pagure to an intermediary version, 2.6, and the > package builds fine on pbuilder/cowbuilder using the latest unstable. > You can find it

Bug#829046: pagure dependencies (JavaScript libraries) packaged

On Saturday, December 24 2016, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On ശനി 24 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 10:54 രാവിലെ, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: >> IMO, if you have time, here's what I would do: >> >> - If you manage to get the building issue sorted out, and if there are >> no other critical issues, then I think the

Bug#829046: pagure dependencies (JavaScript libraries) packaged

On ശനി 24 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 10:54 രാവിലെ, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > IMO, if you have time, here's what I would do: > > - If you manage to get the building issue sorted out, and if there are > no other critical issues, then I think the package is "good enough" > (for a very relaxed definition

Bug#829046: pagure dependencies (JavaScript libraries) packaged

On Tuesday, December 20 2016, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On തിങ്കള്‍ 19 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 11:07 വൈകു, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: >> Things are starting to calm down, and I intend to get back to packaging >> pagure. My intention is to get the latest version imported onto my >> repository and work on

Bug#829046: pagure dependencies (JavaScript libraries) packaged

On തിങ്കള്‍ 19 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 11:07 വൈകു, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > Things are starting to calm down, and I intend to get back to packaging > pagure. My intention is to get the latest version imported onto my > repository and work on it. However, I don't think it will be possible > to finish

Bug#829046: pagure dependencies (JavaScript libraries) packaged

On Monday, December 19 2016, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On Mon, 12 Dec 2016 06:21:35 +1100 Ben Finney wrote: >> I don't understand Grunt or Gulp, but from what I could tell those >> were just being used for typical build tasks. I do understand Make, so >> I reproduced the build

Bug#829046: pagure dependencies (JavaScript libraries) packaged

Control: block -1 by 844943 On തിങ്കള്‍ 19 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 05:55 വൈകു, Pirate Praveen wrote: > When I try to build the package, I get the following error > > File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/bleach/__init__.py", line 8, in > > from html5lib.sanitizer import HTMLSanitizer > ImportError:

Processed: Re: Bug#829046: pagure dependencies (JavaScript libraries) packaged

Processing control commands: > block -1 by 844943 Bug #829046 [wnpp] ITP: pagure -- A git centered forge 829046 was blocked by: 836409 836406 836407 829153 836408 829046 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 829046: 844943 -- 829046:

Bug#829046: pagure dependencies (JavaScript libraries) packaged

[ccing everyone who showed interest] On Mon, 19 Dec 2016 16:35:07 +0530 Pirate Praveen wrote: > Since Sergio has been silent for sometime and freeze is approaching fast > (we have only time till Dec 25, less than a week to get pagure into > stretch), I will copy his repo to

Bug#829046: pagure dependencies (JavaScript libraries) packaged

On Mon, 12 Dec 2016 06:21:35 +1100 Ben Finney wrote: > I don't understand Grunt or Gulp, but from what I could tell those > were just being used for typical build tasks. I do understand Make, so > I reproduced the build tasks in Debian's ‘rules’ makefile :-) Btw I just

Bug#829046: pagure dependencies (JavaScript libraries) packaged

On 05-Sep-2016, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > […] from my recent experience packaging some JS libs, I fear that > the building issue will not be solved in the near future. I have packaged the two remaining JavaScript libraries that were blocking this RFP, ‘jquery-at.js’ and ‘jquery-caret.js’.