Your message dated Tue, 28 Nov 2017 00:00:10 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#849042: fixed in fonts-noto-color-emoji 0~20170913-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #849042,
regarding ITP: fonts-noto-color-emoji -- Color emoji set from Android
to be
On 24 October 2017 at 10:47, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 1:11 AM, Medical Wei wrote:
>> I am recently (1-2 weeks ago) into some ITP and RFPs of some Python
>> libraries to build fonts from source, like ufolib, defcon, and henrich is
>> going to
On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 1:11 AM, Medical Wei wrote:
> I am recently (1-2 weeks ago) into some ITP and RFPs of some Python
> libraries to build fonts from source, like ufolib, defcon, and henrich is
> going to update fonttools. This can lead towards to packaging nototools to
> build
Hi,
Sorry for MIA.
I am recently (1-2 weeks ago) into some ITP and RFPs of some Python
libraries to build fonts from source, like ufolib, defcon, and henrich is
going to update fonttools. This can lead towards to packaging nototools to
build this package from source.
Yao Wei
On Sun, 20 Aug
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 848198 849042
Bug #848198 [wnpp] ITP: fonts-noto-color-emoji -- Color emoji set from Android
Bug #849042 [wnpp] RFP: fonts-noto-emoji -- "No Tofu" emoji font
Owner recorded as "Ming-ting Yao Wei (魏銘廷)" <m..
Processing control commands:
> merge 848198 849042
Bug #848198 [wnpp] ITP: fonts-noto-color-emoji -- Color emoji set from Android
Unable to merge bugs because:
owner of #849042 is '' not '"Ming-ting Yao Wei (魏銘廷)" <m...@lxde.org>'
Failed to merge 848198: Did not alter merged
Control: merge 848198 849042
Hi, has there been any progress on packaging Noto Emoji?
Thanks,
Jeremy Bicha
Seems good. I was on the mobile phone and the download link didn't appear
for the mobile.
On Mon, 6 Mar 2017 at 11:11 Anthony Wong wrote:
> Hi Yao Wei,
>
> I see there is a colour one at
> https://www.google.com/get/noto/#emoji-zsye-color, should we give this
> one a shot
Hi Yao Wei,
I see there is a colour one at
https://www.google.com/get/noto/#emoji-zsye-color, should we give this one
a shot instead?
Thanks,
Anthony
On 6 March 2017 at 10:49, Yao Wei wrote:
> However prebuilt Noto Color Emoji isn't in the original repository but in
> Android
However prebuilt Noto Color Emoji isn't in the original repository but in
Android source. The TTF in the repo is old greyscale Emoji. If that's
considered okay I can go that way.
On Mon, 6 Mar 2017 at 03:18 Anthony Wong wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wonder if we can skip building it
Hi,
I wonder if we can skip building it from source and just package the
pre-built font file provided by Google? Like what we are doing with Noto
CJK font.
The license of the font file is SIL Open Font License Version 1.1, as far
as I check.
Thanks,
Anthony Wong
Yikes, that is quite a hassle. I am CC'ing the Debian Fonts Task force and
maybe someone from there has some suggestion on how to deal with the
nototools dependency in order to build the NotoColorEmoji.ttf.
Also I think it's true based on the GitHub repo (
Hi,
I am packing that but progressing slowly because there's need to upload build
dependency (nototools, #848206) to build from source and I might need to handle
the documentation of the package.
I can do a rename of this ITP to include the fallback version of the emoji.
Should we do that?
Hello Yao,
Are you progressing with packaging fonts-noto-color-emoji? I filed an RFP:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=849042
and a fonts-noto wishlist item:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=849127
before discovering your intent to package filed on 15 December.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Ming-ting Yao Wei (魏銘廷)"
* Package name: fonts-noto-color-emoji
* URL : https://www.google.com/get/noto/help/emoji/
* License : Apache 2.0
Description : Color emoji set from Android
Noto color emoji is the
15 matches
Mail list logo