Bug#852004: RFP fpr bioperl's Bio-EUtilities

2017-01-23 Thread Fields, Christopher J
Andreas, Just ran tests on a non-networked laptop (both latest from Github and the 1.75 release from CPAN) and they were fine, all passed and the relevant network tests are skipped. Can you be more specific as to the build failure? chris On 1/23/17, 12:46 PM, "Fields, Christopher J" wrote:

Bug#852004: RFP fpr bioperl's Bio-EUtilities

2017-01-23 Thread Fields, Christopher J
Actually, when looking at this, the network tests are already in ‘xt’ on the repo, and should only tested when making a release: https://github.com/bioperl/Bio-EUtilities/tree/master/xt/release I’ll pull down the latest CPAN and run it from a non-networked computer to see if I can pinpoint what

Bug#852004: RFP fpr bioperl's Bio-EUtilities

2017-01-23 Thread Fields, Christopher J
My suggestion is to take the avenue of easiest solution first, then most stable solution long-term if needed. The easiest may be to move the network tests to ‘xt’, which as Carnė mentioned would be run upon release only. This should be easy enough w/ a Dist::Zilla release. Longer term a moc

Bug#852004: RFP fpr bioperl's Bio-EUtilities

2017-01-23 Thread Carnë Draug
On 23 January 2017 at 12:40, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Carnė, > > On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 05:44:00PM +, Carnė Draug wrote: >> I have filled a RFP (bug # 852004) for bioperl's Bio-EUtilities >> package [1]. Unlike Bio-Coordinate, which was split from bioperl and >> was recently packaged in Deb

Bug#852004: RFP fpr bioperl's Bio-EUtilities

2017-01-23 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Carnë, On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 05:44:00PM +, Carnë Draug wrote: > I have filled a RFP (bug # 852004) for bioperl's Bio-EUtilities > package [1]. Unlike Bio-Coordinate, which was split from bioperl and > was recently packaged in Debian, Bio-EUtilities development started > already after bio