Bug#861646: ITP: reprounzip -- Linux tools for reproducible experiments

On Tue, 2017-05-02 at 15:14 -0400, Rémi Rampin wrote: > 2017-05-02 15:05 EDT, Ghislain Vaillant : > > Thanks for clarifying. Just out-of-curiosity, why is the tracer > > restricted to x86? > > There is no technical limitation here, I would just have to write the > system call

Bug#861646: ITP: reprounzip -- Linux tools for reproducible experiments

2017-05-02 15:05 EDT, Ghislain Vaillant : > Thanks for clarifying. Just out-of-curiosity, why is the tracer > restricted to x86? There is no technical limitation here, I would just have to write the system call map [1] for other platforms (and find a CI service I can test it

Bug#861646: ITP: reprounzip -- Linux tools for reproducible experiments

On Tue, 2017-05-02 at 12:55 -0400, Rémi Rampin wrote: > 2017-05-02 12:11 EDT, Ghislain Vaillant: > > Do you mean Linux the kernel or the platform? The tracer would not work > > on a non-Linux kernel such as FreeBSD or the Hurd, am I right? > > The tracer requires a Linux kernel, and currently

Bug#861646: ITP: reprounzip -- Linux tools for reproducible experiments

2017-05-02 12:11 EDT, Ghislain Vaillant: > Do you mean Linux the kernel or the platform? The tracer would not work > on a non-Linux kernel such as FreeBSD or the Hurd, am I right? The tracer requires a Linux kernel, and currently only supports x86 and x86_64. > Since the tool itself targets

Bug#861646: ITP: reprounzip -- Linux tools for reproducible experiments

On Tue, 2017-05-02 at 09:54 -0400, Rémi Rampin wrote: > 2017-05-02 05:44 -0400, Ghislain Vaillant: > > Each tool is registered as a separate download on pip and are versioned > > separately. Based on that alone, I guess it makes more sense to provide > > separate source packages too. > > Hi,

Bug#861646: Bug#860531: Bug#861646: ITP: reprounzip -- Linux tools for reproducible experiments

2017-05-02 05:44 -0400, Ghislain Vaillant: > Each tool is registered as a separate download on pip and are versioned > separately. Based on that alone, I guess it makes more sense to provide > separate source packages too. Hi, ReproZip author here. To give some context, the tools are packaged

Bug#861646: ITP: reprounzip -- Linux tools for reproducible experiments

On Tue, May 02, 2017 at 12:59:31PM +0100, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > Good point. I'll forward your suggestion upstream. thank you! :) -- cheers, Holger signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#861646: ITP: reprounzip -- Linux tools for reproducible experiments

On Tue, 2017-05-02 at 11:51 +, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Tue, May 02, 2017 at 11:18:35AM +0100, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > > > and how is it different from zip? (or tar|gzip) > > > those can also be used to (un)pack reproducible archives… > > > > The unpacking step includes fetching the

Bug#861646: ITP: reprounzip -- Linux tools for reproducible experiments

On Tue, May 02, 2017 at 11:18:35AM +0100, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > > and how is it different from zip? (or tar|gzip) > > those can also be used to (un)pack reproducible archives… > The unpacking step includes fetching the necessary dependencies, and > spawning a run of the experiment (locally,

Bug#861646: ITP: reprounzip -- Linux tools for reproducible experiments

On Tue, 2017-05-02 at 10:07 +, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Tue, May 02, 2017 at 11:04:48AM +0100, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > > In a nutshell, take a scientific experiment (data + processing > > pipeline), create a single archive out of it (packing step), and enable > > a different machine to

Bug#861646: ITP: reprounzip -- Linux tools for reproducible experiments

On Tue, 2017-05-02 at 09:53 +, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Tue, May 02, 2017 at 10:44:49AM +0100, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > I still wonder what these tools exactly do, though ;-) In a nutshell, take a scientific experiment (data + processing pipeline), create a single archive out of it

Bug#861646: ITP: reprounzip -- Linux tools for reproducible experiments

On Tue, May 02, 2017 at 11:04:48AM +0100, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > In a nutshell, take a scientific experiment (data + processing > pipeline), create a single archive out of it (packing step), and enable > a different machine to reproduce the experiment (unpacking step). and how is it different

Bug#860531: Bug#861646: ITP: reprounzip -- Linux tools for reproducible experiments

On Tue, May 02, 2017 at 10:44:49AM +0100, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > > I didnt notice because those two bugs have > > - an identical upstream URL > > - an identical description > > - actually everything identical except for the package name > TBH, I have been a bit lazy on that one. I could have

Bug#861646: ITP: reprounzip -- Linux tools for reproducible experiments

On Tue, 2017-05-02 at 09:31 +, Holger Levsen wrote: > unmerge 860531 > > On Tue, May 02, 2017 at 10:18:00AM +0100, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > > > a few days ago you already filed an ITP bug for this package?!! > > > > No, reprozip != reprounzip (one is the packer, the other is the > >

Processed (with 5 errors): Re: Bug#860531: Bug#861646: ITP: reprounzip -- Linux tools for reproducible experiments

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > unmerge 860531 Bug #860531 [wnpp] ITP: reprozip -- Linux tools for reproducible experiments Bug #861646 [wnpp] ITP: reprounzip -- Linux tools for reproducible experiments Disconnected #860531 from all other report(s). > On Tue, May 02, 2017

Bug#860531: Bug#861646: ITP: reprounzip -- Linux tools for reproducible experiments

unmerge 860531 On Tue, May 02, 2017 at 10:18:00AM +0100, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > > a few days ago you already filed an ITP bug for this package?!! > No, reprozip != reprounzip (one is the packer, the other is the > unpacker). aha! I didnt notice because those two bugs have - an identical

Bug#860531: Bug#861646: ITP: reprounzip -- Linux tools for reproducible experiments

forcemerge 861646 860531 thanks On Tue, May 02, 2017 at 09:19:07AM +0100, Ghislain Antony Vaillant wrote: > Owner: Ghislain Antony Vaillant > > * Package name: reprounzip a few days ago you already filed an ITP bug for this package?!! -- cheers, Holger

Processed: Re: Bug#861646: ITP: reprounzip -- Linux tools for reproducible experiments

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 861646 860531 Bug #861646 [wnpp] ITP: reprounzip -- Linux tools for reproducible experiments Bug #860531 [wnpp] ITP: reprozip -- Linux tools for reproducible experiments Merged 860531 861646 > thanks Stopping processing here.

Bug#861646: ITP: reprounzip -- Linux tools for reproducible experiments

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Ghislain Antony Vaillant * Package name: reprounzip Version : 1.0.9 Upstream Author : Remi Rampin et al. * URL : https://www.reprozip.org/ * License : BSD Programming Lang: Python Description