Bug#661565: ITP: nyancat -- Terminal-based Pop Tart Cat animation

Hi, On Mittwoch, 29. Februar 2012, Jonathan McCrohan wrote: I certainly don't plan on uploading and abandoning this package, but given the high level of opposition to this ITP, guess there is little point pursuing it. I think this is sad. I would love to have nyancat in Debian. (with sound!)

Processed: ITA: wfrench -- French dictionary words for /usr/share/dict

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: retitle 654554 ITA: wfrench -- French dictionary words for /usr/share/dict Bug #654554 [wnpp] RFA: wfrench -- French dictionary words for /usr/share/dict Changed Bug title to 'ITA: wfrench -- French dictionary words for /usr/share/dict' from

Bug#654942: marked as done (O: develock-el -- additional font-lock keywords for the developers on Emacs)

Your message dated Wed, 29 Feb 2012 11:17:11 + with message-id e1s2hwx-00083m...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#654942: fixed in develock-el 0.39-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #654942, regarding O: develock-el -- additional font-lock keywords for the developers on Emacs to be

Bug#661692: RFP: libwebinject-perl -- Perl Module for testing web services

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: libwebinject-perl Version : 1.72 Upstream Author : Sven NIerlein * URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Webinject/ * License : GPL Programming Lang: Perl Description : Perl Module for testing web services

Bug#615895: New upstream of grap

Hi Markus and Jan, there's now a new upstream version of grap available (1.44). You might want to prepare that package for Debian and close this ITA bug at the same time. Regards, Tobias signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#654924: Fwd: Re: TigerVNC 1.0.90 src debs

Hi Joachim, On Mo 27 Feb 2012 23:30:51 CET Joachim Falk wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am 23.02.2012 20:00, schrieb Joachim Falk: Am 23.02.2012 13:04, schrieb Mike Gabriel: Hi Joachim, On Do 23 Feb 2012 11:47:45 CET Joachim Falk wrote: Hmm. Wait a bit. At the

Bug#650668: ITP: tardiff -- Tarball comparison tool

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Alex, If you need help or do you want me to take care of it ? Please don't hesitate to contact me, I'll be happy to help. Greetings. Khalid. - -- .''`. Khalid El Fathi kha...@elfathi.fr : :' : GPG: 4096R/9368CAEC `. `'` `- -BEGIN

Bug#650668: ITP: tardiff -- Tarball comparison tool

Hi Khalid, Khalid El Fathi wrote: If you need help or do you want me to take care of it ? Please don't hesitate to contact me, I'll be happy to help. Hrm, I'm actually just waiting for feedback from upstream about a patch I wrote to fix an issue I found. But yeah, I think I'd better upload

Bug#650668: ITP: tardiff -- Tarball comparison tool

On 02/29/2012 04:14 PM, Axel Beckert wrote: But yeah, I think I'd better upload a patched 0.1 (see below) than waiting for 0.2. The package in the current state is available here: http://noone.org/debian/tardiff_0.1-1.dsc http://noone.org/debian/tardiff_0.1-1_all.deb Ok thanks for

Bug#389591: ITP: freeswitch -- Modular Media Switching Software Library and Soft-Switch

We currently have a couple of FreeSWITCH Community Developers work on getting this to a point where we can submit it... Anyone is welcome to join us on the weekly FreeSWITCH Community Call Wed at 1PM (13:00) EST to talk about this. Ken Rice FreeSWITCH Stable Maintainer

Processed: Change of address

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: submitter 644193 ! Bug #644193 [bzr-builddeb] dpkg-source: error: aborting due to unexpected upstream changes Changed Bug submitter to 'Björn Påhlsson bel...@recompile.se' from 'Björn Påhlsson belorn+bugrep...@recompile.se' submitter 648609

Bug#654382: ITP: httpcode -- utility that explains the meaning of an HTTP status code on the command line

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 retitle 654382 ITP: httpcode -- utility that explains the meaning of an HTTP status code on the command line owner 654382 Khalid El Fathi kha...@elfathi.fr - -- .''`. Khalid El Fathi kha...@elfathi.fr : :' : GPG: 4096R/9368CAEC `. `'` `-

Bug#561046: ITP: gcc-arm -- The GNU C Compiler (cross-compiler for ARM targets)

Hi, this bugreport has been silent for a while. Has there been an update since? I have successfully compiled arm-none-eabi (baremetal) code for the redbee econotag board using arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc from the emdebian repositories. I only needed to direct it to link with a different libc.a and

Processed: tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # Wed Feb 29 19:03:16 UTC 2012 # Tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW # http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html # # Source package in NEW: tack tags 660140 + pending Bug #660140 [wnpp] ITP: tack -- terminfo action checker

Processed (with 1 errors): ITP: httpcode -- utility that explains the meaning of an,HTTP status code on the command line

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: retitle 654382 ITP: httpcode -- utility that explains the meaning of an Bug #654382 [wnpp] RFP: httpcode -- utility that explains the meaning of an HTTP status code on the command line Changed Bug title to 'ITP: httpcode -- utility that explains

Processed (with 1 errors): ITP: httpcode -- utility that explains the meaning of an, HTTP status code on the command line

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: retitle 654382 ITP: httpcode -- utility that explains the meaning of an, Bug #654382 [wnpp] ITP: httpcode -- utility that explains the meaning of an Changed Bug title to 'ITP: httpcode -- utility that explains the meaning of an,' from 'ITP:

Bug#561046: ITP: gcc-arm -- The GNU C Compiler (cross-compiler for ARM targets)

Hello Johannes, 2012/2/29 Johannes Schauer j.scha...@email.de: this bugreport has been silent for a while. Has there been an update since? True, we have been waiting for multi-arch, so we can have multi-arch based cross compilers. I have successfully compiled arm-none-eabi (baremetal) code

Processed: retitle 448532 to ITP: piwik -- real time web analytics software program

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # Please don't abuse RFH for non existing packages retitle 448532 ITP: piwik -- real time web analytics software program Bug #448532 [wnpp] RFH: piwik -- real time web analytics software program Bug #506933 [wnpp] RFH: piwik -- real time web

Bug#661741: ITP: xul-ext-collusion -- visualize who's tracking you in real time

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Fabrizio Regalli fab...@fabreg.it X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-mozext-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org * Package name: xul-ext-collusion Version : 0.16.1 Upstream Author : Jono X jdica...@mozilla.com * URL :

Bug#656044: bug-wrangling related to gcc-4.6-doc

retitle 656044 ITP: gcc-4.6-doc -- documentation for the GNU compilers (gcc, gobjc, g++) owner 656044 ! reassign 619933 wnpp merge 656044 619933 thanks I'm dropping bug 656043 in favor of bug 656044 (which I should have retitled ages ago) at the direction of Matthias Klose:

Processed (with 1 errors): bug-wrangling related to gcc-4.6-doc

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: retitle 656044 ITP: gcc-4.6-doc -- documentation for the GNU compilers (gcc, gobjc, g++) Bug #656044 [wnpp] RFP: gcc-4.6-doc -- documentation for the GNU compilers (gcc, gobjc, g++) Changed Bug title to 'ITP: gcc-4.6-doc -- documentation for

Bug#479951: Re: RFH: kvm -- Full virtualization on x86 hardware

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 retitle 479951 RFH: qemu-kvm -- Full virtualization on x86 hardware thanks Hi Michael, Le -10/01/-28163 15:59, Michael Tokarev a écrit : Jan, I'm trying to reach you for over half a year already (since about Feb-2009). Since kvm is gone,

Processed: Re: Re: RFH: kvm -- Full virtualization on x86 hardware

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: retitle 479951 RFH: qemu-kvm -- Full virtualization on x86 hardware Bug #479951 [wnpp] RFH: kvm -- Full virtualization on x86 hardware (Need help with ia64, ppc and s390) Changed Bug title to 'RFH: qemu-kvm -- Full virtualization on x86 hardware'

Processed (with 2 errors): Re: bug-wrangling related to gcc-4.6-doc

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: retitle 656044 ITP: gcc-4.6-doc -- documentation for the GNU compilers Bug #656044 [wnpp] ITP: gcc-4.6-doc -- documentation for the GNU compilers (gcc, gobjc, g++) Changed Bug title to 'ITP: gcc-4.6-doc -- documentation for the GNU compilers'

Bug#656043: marked as done (ITP: gcc-4.5-doc -- documentation for the GNU compilers (gcc, gobjc, g++))

Your message dated Wed, 29 Feb 2012 17:10:44 -0500 with message-id CAJYzjmc+uAw7jAdyHCqhoquEkTKNmuqmG3F=rjmbg5tcmqf...@mail.gmail.com and subject line Re: bug-wrangling related to gcc-4.6-doc has caused the Debian Bug report #656043, regarding ITP: gcc-4.5-doc -- documentation for the GNU

Processed (with 2 errors): bug-wrangling related to gcc-4.6-doc

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 619933 wishlist Bug #619933 [wnpp] gcc-4.6-doc: please upload to unstable Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal' blocked-by 619933 660955 Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. owner 619933 ! Bug #619933 [wnpp]

Processed: tagging 661600

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 661600 + pending Bug #661600 [wnpp] ITP: libcairo-gobject-perl -- integrate Cairo into the Glib type system in Perl Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 661600:

Bug#657076: Updating and maintaining barry in Debian / Ubuntu

Hi Chris! One month has passed, and nobody adopted the barry package in Debian; the Wheezy freeze will happen in a few months. I suggest you decide whether you want to take care of barry in Debian, so that we avoid uploading packages in a hurry at the last minute. My help proposal (reviews and

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 619933 by 660955 Bug #619933 [wnpp] gcc-4.6-doc: please upload to unstable Was not blocked by any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 619933: 660955 merge 656044 619933 Bug#619933: gcc-4.6-doc: please upload to unstable Bug#656044: ITP:

Bug#657076: Updating and maintaining barry in Debian / Ubuntu

On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 01:37:42AM +0100, intrigeri wrote: Hi Chris! One month has passed, and nobody adopted the barry package in Debian; the Wheezy freeze will happen in a few months. I suggest you decide whether you want to take care of barry in Debian, so that we avoid uploading

Bug#649401: Is git-review for Debian available ?

Hi, I'm working on OpenStack, and I really need git-review package to submit patches upstream. What is the status ? How can I help ? Where to download ? -- -Alexey Eromenko Technologov -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?

Bug#649401: Is git-review for Debian available ?

One of our devs packaged it for Ubuntu: https://lists.launchpad.net/openstack/msg07061.html and it's going to be in the upcoming ubuntu precise release: http://packages.ubuntu.com/precise/git-review I'm not aware of anyone uploading it to debian yet - but it shouldn't be hard to either install

Bug#661765: ITP: oqapy -- Photographic workflow application

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Vincent Vande Vyvre vincent.vandevy...@swing.be * Package name: oqapy Version : 1.0 Upstream Author : Vincent Vande Vyvre vincent.vandevy...@swing.be * URL : http://www.oqapy.eu * License : GPL3 Programming Lang:

Bug#649401: [Openstack-devel] Bug#649401: Is git-review for Debian available ?

If nobody says anything, I'll take a look to see if it's possible to include it officialy in Debian. Ghe Rivero On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 4:54 AM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote: One of our devs packaged it for Ubuntu: https://lists.launchpad.net/openstack/msg07061.html and it's going

Bug#654555: stl-manual

I am interested in maintaining this package, but I would require sponsorship as I'm not yet a maintainer. Thanks, -- Andrew Edwards edwards.and...@gmail.com web: http://www.ajed.net skype: edwards.a.j.