Bug#803257: ITP: reactivedata -- FRP with incremental changes in data structures

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Stéphane Glondu" * Package name: reactivedata Version : 0.1 Upstream Author : Hugo Heuzard * URL : https://github.com/ocsigen/reactiveData * License : LGPL Programming Lang: OCaml Description

Bug#796962: marked as done (ITP: libsdsl -- succinct data structure library)

Your message dated Wed, 28 Oct 2015 12:00:14 + with message-id and subject line Bug#796962: fixed in libsdsl 2.0.3-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #796962, regarding ITP: libsdsl -- succinct data structure library to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#803213: marked as done (ITP: golang-gopkg-olivere-elastic.v2 -- Elasticsearch client for Golang)

Your message dated Wed, 28 Oct 2015 12:00:13 + with message-id and subject line Bug#803213: fixed in golang-gopkg-olivere-elastic.v2 2.0.12-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #803213, regarding ITP: golang-gopkg-olivere-elastic.v2 -- Elasticsearch client

Bug#796487: marked as done (ITP: repeatmasker-recon -- indentification of repeat families from biological sequences)

Your message dated Wed, 28 Oct 2015 12:00:15 + with message-id and subject line Bug#796487: fixed in repeatmasker-recon 1.08-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #796487, regarding ITP: repeatmasker-recon -- indentification of repeat families from

Bug#802296: marked as done (ITP: golang-github-stathat-go -- Go package for reporting stat counts and values to StatHat)

Your message dated Wed, 28 Oct 2015 12:00:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#802296: fixed in golang-github-stathat-go 0.0~git20130314.0.01d012b-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #802296, regarding ITP: golang-github-stathat-go -- Go package for

Bug#803266: ITP: python-packaging -- core utilities for python packages

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Matthias Klose * Package name: python-packaging Version : 15.3 Upstream Author : Donald Stufft * URL : https://pypi.python.org/pypi/packaging * License : Apache Programming Lang: Python Description

Bug#803280: ITP: libtext-unicode-equivalents-perl -- build Unicode canonically equivalent strings

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: w...@debian.org X-Debbugs-CC: debian-p...@lists.debian.org, debian-de...@lists.debian.org Package name: libtext-unicode-equivalents-perl Version : 0.05 Upstream Author : Bob Hallissy URL :

Bug#764401: clarity please

Nicholas Bamber dixit: > Please could Thorsten and Dominik please work out who will be responsible for > mksh in Debian? Can you work together if that makes sense? I can sign and > upload if necessary. OK, we had a short talk on the office floor about this ;-) and I’ll be putting myself back

Bug#764401: ksh

Nicholas Bamber dixit: > 2. mksh also should provide 'ksh' as a virtual package. It is my agreement with David Korn (the ‘k’ in “ksh”) that mksh must not be confused for the original, so please refrain from doing so. bye, //mirabilos -- „Cool, /usr/share/doc/mksh/examples/uhr.gz ist ja ein

Bug#764401: clarity please

Okay removing Kenneth as he clearly does not want to be involved. Please could Thorsten and Dominik please work out who will be responsible for mksh in Debian? Can you work together if that makes sense? I can sign and upload if necessary. I have an issue with this: > I answered your

Bug#764401: clarity please

Thorsten, > Mh. I’m maintaining mksh in Debian via sponsors currently, even if > the package doesn’t formally say so, as I left the project. please either maintain mksh, or don't. Saying „I have left the project, but want control over packages so and so“ does not make very much sense for the

Bug#799281: Any update to packaging Mailman3-core ?

On mer. 28 oct. 2015 à 20:19:49, shirish wrote: > Dear Pierre-Elliott Bécue, > > Any update on the packaging of Mailman-3-core ? > > Looking forward to learn more. Good afternoon, Heres some update: * I had some troubles with dependencies, that were fixed in the begining of October. * I

Bug#764401: clarity please

I have thought about this comment a little more: > It is my agreement with David Korn (the ‘k’ in “ksh”) that > mksh must not be confused for the original, so please refrain > from doing so. It seems to me that if a link from ksh to mksh is not an infringement of this agreement, then big

Bug#764401: clarity please

On 28/10/15 15:19, Thorsten Glaser wrote: Nicholas Bamber dixit: Please could Thorsten and Dominik please work out who will be responsible for mksh in Debian? Can you work together if that makes sense? I can sign and upload if necessary. OK, we had a short talk on the office floor about

Processed: tagging 798523

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 798523 + pending Bug #798523 [wnpp] ITP: cen64-qt -- cen64-qt: Cross-platform graphical frontend for the CEN64 emulator. Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 798523:

Bug#764401: clarity please

Nicholas Bamber dixit: > Could we get some clarity on this bug report please? I am considering adopting Yeah, some people have a life and don’t answer eMails 24/7… > the 'ksh' package and if I do I either want to adopt mksh as well, or work > closely with the mksh owner. Mh. I’m maintaining

Bug#776850: still interested?

Hi Edwin, On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 3:19 PM, Török Edwin wrote: > Laszlo, are you still interested in being the maintainer of this package? Sure, I'm. I was a tester of an other cryptography software behind the curtains in the past one (+ a bit more) months. It's Crypto++ [1]

Re: Processed: ITP: elisp-es -- Spanish version of An Introduction to Programming in Emacs Lisp

El 27/10/15 a las 17:21, Debian Bug Tracking System escribió: > Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > >> owner 803074 davidam > Bug #803074 [wnpp] ITP: elisp-es -- Spanish version of An Introduction to > Programming in Emacs Lisp > Owner recorded as davidam

Bug#803195: RFA: spark -- SPARK programming language toolset

Hi, I am one of the SPARK developers. These days there are two revisions of SPARK - a legacy version and the new ada-2012 based one. I would recommend to only package the newer one (spark 2014 -- http://spark-2014.org). If there is anything I can do to help with this, please let me know.

Bug#764401: clarity please

Could we get some clarity on this bug report please? I am considering adopting the 'ksh' package and if I do I either want to adopt mksh as well, or work closely with the mksh owner.

Bug#803280: ITP: libtext-unicode-equivalents-perl -- build Unicode canonically equivalent strings

On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 02:40:39PM +, Daniel Glassey wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > Owner: w...@debian.org > X-Debbugs-CC: debian-p...@lists.debian.org, debian-de...@lists.debian.org > > Package name: libtext-unicode-equivalents-perl > Version : 0.05 > Upstream

Bug#802684: marked as done (ITP: radcli - RADIUS client library for C applications)

Your message dated Wed, 28 Oct 2015 16:00:20 + with message-id and subject line Bug#802684: fixed in radcli 1.2.4-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #802684, regarding ITP: radcli - RADIUS client library for C applications to be marked as done. This means

Bug#802739: artemis_16.0.0+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Afif, On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 09:33:44PM -0700, Afif Elghraoui wrote: > > I'm sorry about that-- I could've sworn I had it right. I think it > should be good now. Andreas, would you mind uploading again? The > corrected version is in git now. Uploaded and please Git pull. I fixed the "old

Bug#799281: Any update to packaging Mailman3-core ?

Dear Pierre-Elliott Bécue, Any update on the packaging of Mailman-3-core ? Looking forward to learn more. -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal, Community Lead, Hamaralinux.org

Bug#797660: marked as done (ITP: golang-github-docker-notary -- a tool for running and interacting with trusted collections)

Your message dated Wed, 28 Oct 2015 17:05:30 + with message-id and subject line Bug#797660: fixed in notary 0.0~git20150801.0.8e8122e-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #797660, regarding ITP: golang-github-docker-notary -- a tool for running and

Bug#799281: Any update to packaging Mailman3-core ?

at bottom :- On 10/28/2015 08:47 PM, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote: On mer. 28 oct. 2015 à 20:19:49, shirish wrote: Dear Pierre-Elliott Bécue, Any update on the packaging of Mailman-3-core ? Looking forward to learn more. Good afternoon, Heres some update: * I had some troubles with

Processed: Re: You have new fax, document 000775106

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 244582 Bug #244582 {Done: "Interfax" } [wnpp] ITP: ufoai -- UFO: Alien Invasion - build your team and stop the aliens Bug reopened Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #244582 to the same values

Bug#799281: Any update to packaging Mailman3-core ?

On mer. 28 oct. 2015 à 22:53:48, shirish wrote: > at bottom :- > > On 10/28/2015 08:47 PM, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote: > >On mer. 28 oct. 2015 à 20:19:49, shirish wrote: > >>Dear Pierre-Elliott Bécue, > >> > >>Any update on the packaging of Mailman-3-core ? > >> > >>Looking forward to learn more.

Bug#803354: ITP: dsfmt -- dSFMT pseudorandom number generator

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Peter Colberg * Package name: dsfmt Version : 2.2.3 Upstream Author : Mutsuo Saito and Makoto Matsumoto * URL : http://www.math.sci.hiroshima-u.ac.jp/~m-mat/MT/SFMT/ * License : BSD-3-clause

Bug#764401: clarity please

On 28/10/15 21:04, Thorsten Glaser wrote: Nicholas Bamber dixit: 1.) If ksh is installed then ksh should be in /etc/shells. (#790118) I don’t think so. Users should be getting ksh93 or mksh (or, in earlier releases, even pdksh), but not an alternative. 2.) If ksh is not installed but mksh

Bug#803195: RFA: spark -- SPARK programming language toolset

I know about the new version, I also tried to compile it for Debian, but it was alsways failing either because of internal compiler error or other reasons. And now I just have no time for packaing it. 28 жовтня 2015 о 09:47 + Florian Schanda написав(-ла): > Hi, > > I am one of the SPARK

Bug#764401: clarity please

Nicholas Bamber dixit: > 1.) If ksh is installed then ksh should be in /etc/shells. (#790118) I don’t think so. Users should be getting ksh93 or mksh (or, in earlier releases, even pdksh), but not an alternative. > 2.) If ksh is not installed but mksh is and ksh links to mksh via >

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # bugs with submitter stein.mag...@jodal.no > submitter 795085 jo...@debian.org Bug #795085 [pafy] python-pafy: Upstream supports Python 2.6+, but Debian package only Python 3 Changed Bug submitter to 'jo...@debian.org' from 'Stein Magnus Jodal

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # bugs with submitter stein.mag...@jodal.no > submitter 803202 ! Bug #803202 {Done: Chris Lamb } [python-gunicorn] python-gunicorn: post-inst fails to pycompile _gaiohttp.py Bug #803170 {Done: Chris Lamb }

Bug#803347: RFP: err -- pluggable chatbot

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: err Version : 3.1.1 Upstream Author : Guillaume Binet * URL : http://errbot.net/ * License : GPL3+ Programming Lang: Python Description : pluggable chatbot Err is a chatbot designed to

Bug#764401: ksh

Hi, the proposals posted here seem to make sense. I will make sure to finalise my adoption of mksh within the next two weeks and incorporate the desired changes. Cheers, Nik -- PGP-Fingerprint: 3C9D 54A4 7575 C026 FB17 FD26 B79A 3C16 A0C4 F296 Dominik George · Mobil: +49-151-61623918

Processed: ksh

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 691199 ITA: ksh -- Real, AT version of the Korn shell Bug #691199 [wnpp] RFA: ksh -- Real, AT version of the Korn shell Changed Bug title to 'ITA: ksh -- Real, AT version of the Korn shell' from 'RFA: ksh -- Real, AT version of the Korn