I happen to have written source packages for various versions of
stepmania with cdbs-style rules files, hosted at
http://www.eng.uwaterloo.ca/~sruggier/files/apt/. There are three
versions - one of the 4.0 versions is from a snapshot, and the newest
version is checked directly out of CVS, and
On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 02:28:35AM -0400, Simon Ruggier wrote:
I happen to have written source packages for various versions of
stepmania with cdbs-style rules files, hosted at
http://www.eng.uwaterloo.ca/~sruggier/files/apt/. There are three
versions - one of the 4.0 versions is from a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6
tags 414529 + pending
Bug#414529: ITA: xracer -- Futuristic racing game
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
#missing package name
retitle 124133 RFP: fax4cups -- efax backend for CUPS
Bug#124133: RFP: efax backend for CUPS
Changed Bug title to `RFP: fax4cups -- efax backend for CUPS' from `RFP: efax
backend for CUPS'.
#ITP and RFP for the same bug
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 11:28:28 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#421626: fixed in modello 1.0-alpha-8-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 282235 wnpp
Bug#282235: Lexmark printing suddenly broken (had to compile z42_cmyk on my own)
Bug reassigned from package `cupsys' to `wnpp'.
retitle 282235 RFP: Lexmark z42_cmyk CUPS back-end
Bug#282235: Lexmark printing suddenly broken (had
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 11:35:05 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#416162: fixed in zeroinstall-injector 0.29-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 11:36:21 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#431614: fixed in gsoko 0.4.2-gpe6-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 11:43:40 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#423619: fixed in libfontbox-java 0.1.0.dfsg-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 430725 wontfix
Bug#430725: ITP: webboard -- Copy and paste to a public pastebin server
There were no tags set.
Tags added: wontfix
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
tag 430725 wontfix
thanks
I tag it wontfix, as there seems to be no development anymore upstream.
As soon as this changes, I will remove
this tag.
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 12:48:15 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#426954: fixed in rsstail 1.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 12:39:12 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#427094: fixed in tetgen 1.4.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 12:54:31 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#431626: fixed in python-boto 0.9a-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 12:55:27 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#381418: fixed in wapiti 1.1.6-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 02:28:45PM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
reassign 282235 wnpp
retitle 282235 RFP: Lexmark z42_cmyk CUPS back-end
thanks
On 7/15/07, Alexander Sack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This bug most likely still persist. Last time I tried the lexmark just
didn't work right
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 13:08:08 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#432140: fixed in pipewalker 0.2.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 13:14:56 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#431465: fixed in libsvg 0.1.4-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 13:13:09 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#431536: fixed in z80dasm 1.0.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 13:20:42 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#416380: fixed in vim-syntax-gtk 20061121-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 13:15:59 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#431912: fixed in hex-a-hop 0.0.20070315-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 13:46:49 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#427372: fixed in python-btsutils 0.1.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 13:50:35 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#432274: fixed in fbreader 0.8.5a-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 14:10:48 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#432506: fixed in libcgi-untaint-date-perl 1.00-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 14:10:50 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#432507: fixed in libcgi-untaint-email-perl 0.03-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Hi,
On Fri, 13 Jul 2007, Francesco Namuri wrote:
Francesco, where can I get your latest package?
Did you base your work on the existing Ubuntu package made by Adrien?
I've made the debianization from scratch, unfortunately I have not
checked on the repositories ubuntu to verify if it had
Hello,
Do you have any plan to RFS/upload this package?
#396847 owner is Martin Lohmeier [EMAIL PROTECTED] but I see
in pkg-php SVN that Uploaders: is [EMAIL PROTECTED], then I Cc:
everybody.
Note that php-auth-sasl is in Recommends: field of
php-net-smtp package (bug #369273).
Regards,
--
Hi,
Il giorno dom, 15/07/2007 alle 15.24 +0200, Raphael Hertzog ha scritto:
Hi,
On Fri, 13 Jul 2007, Francesco Namuri wrote:
Francesco, where can I get your latest package?
Did you base your work on the existing Ubuntu package made by Adrien?
I've made the debianization from
On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 12:11:09AM +0300, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
* Package name: bzr-rebase
Any good reason for this being a separate package instead of becoming
part of bzrtools?
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science ... now what?
[EMAIL
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 18:05:08 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line close cdw RFH
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
tags 402650 -wontfix
thanks
foxyproxy package is within NEW queue ;-) See it soon in sid.
Cheers
--
Yaroslav Halchenko
Research Assistant, Psychology Department, Rutgers-Newark
Student Ph.D. @ CS Dept. NJIT
Office: (973) 353-5440x263 | FWD: 82823 | Fax: (973) 353-1171
101 Warren Str,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 402650 -wontfix
Bug#402650: ITP: mozilla-foxyproxy -- advanced proxy management tool for
iceweasel
Tags were: pending wontfix
Tags removed: wontfix
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
Hi,
On Sun, 15 Jul 2007, Francesco Namuri wrote:
I'd suggest to put your work in the collab-maint SVN repository.
Please give me both (you and Adrien) your Alioth username and I'll add
you to the project so that you can svn-inject -O dscfile
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Hello,
Due to changes in my RL situation, I will no longer be able to
contribute to maintenance of torrus. It is a monitoring application
written in Perl, using RRD to collect arbitrary data (traditional
application is stats collection from SNMP-capable devices)
On 7/15/07, Steinar H. Gunderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, thanks, but the packaging itself is not the problem -- both Miriam and
I already have local packages, and have had for some time. :-)
Sorry, I didn't mean to interfere with your efforts, but I thought
that some users would still
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 17:32:10 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#414529: fixed in xracer 0.96.9.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
package wnpp
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: wnpp
retitle 407666 ITA: gv -- PostScript and PDF viewer for X
Bug#407666: O: gv -- PostScript and PDF viewer for X
Changed Bug title to `ITA: gv -- PostScript and PDF viewer for X' from `O: gv
--
package wnpp
retitle 407666 ITA: gv -- PostScript and PDF viewer for X
owner 407666 !
thanks
Hi, I'm considering adopting gv.
Hochachtungsvoll,
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 21:04:00 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Owner: Gregory Colpart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
I intent to adopt this package and work on
a new version with bug fixes.
Actual informations about this package:
Package: php-file
Priority: optional
Section: web
Installed-Size: 96
Maintainer: Chris Anderson [EMAIL
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Owner: Gregory Colpart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
I intent to adopt this package and work on
a new version with bug fixes.
Actual informations about this package:
Package: php-auth
Priority: optional
Section: web
Installed-Size: 236
Maintainer: Chris Anderson
On Sun, 2007-07-15 at 17:18 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 12:11:09AM +0300, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
* Package name: bzr-rebase
Any good reason for this being a separate package instead of becoming
part of bzrtools?
Yes, it's a different upstream package.
Cheers,
Your message dated Sun, 15 Jul 2007 21:17:03 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#407666: fixed in gv 1:3.6.3dfsg-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6
# renaming to match the package in NEW
retitle 396906 ITP: ttf-inconsolata -- Monospace font designed for code listings
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6
# renaming to match the package in NEW
retitle 396906 ITP: ttf-inconsolata -- Monospace font designed for code
listings
Bug#396906: ITP: inconsolata -- Monospace font designed for
On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 10:48:14PM +0200, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
Any good reason for this being a separate package instead of becoming
part of bzrtools?
Yes, it's a different upstream package.
I was indeed too cryptic, sorry, let me explain.
I don't want to see a bzr-foo package in the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 360269 ftp.debian.org
Bug#360269: O: sanduhr -- an alarm clock, which is designed as a hourglass
Bug reassigned from package `wnpp' to `ftp.debian.org'.
tag 360269 + remove remove-roqa
Unknown tag/s: remove, remove-roqa.
Recognized are: patch
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Florent Bayle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: libpano13
Version : 2.9.12
Upstream Author : Bruno Postle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://panotools.sf.net/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description :
On Mon, 2007-07-16 at 00:28 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 10:48:14PM +0200, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
Any good reason for this being a separate package instead of becoming
part of bzrtools?
Yes, it's a different upstream package.
I was indeed too cryptic, sorry,
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Michel Casabona [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: hachoir-subfile
Version : 0.5.2
Upstream Authors: Victor Stinner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://hachoir.org/
Licence : GPLv2
Programming Lang: Python
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Michel Casabona [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: hachoir-regex
Version : 1.0.2
Upstream Authors: Victor Stinner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://hachoir.org/
Licence : GPLv2
Programming Lang: Python
Description
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# the following bugs are closed by packages in NEW
#
tags 308339 pending
Bug#308339: Wrong source package name
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
tags 405005 pending
Bug#405005: setupcon in console-setup has no manpage
There were no tags
Package:wnpp
Owner: Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso [EMAIL PROTECTED]
severity: wishlist
*Package name : processing
version : 0125 BETA
Upstream Authors: Ben Fry [EMAIL PROTECTED], Casey Reas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*URL: http://www.processing.org/download/index.html
*License : GPL/LGPL
Programming Language:
Documents are enclosed.
These are intended for the mailbox of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All our private messages are in pdf format.
Best Regards;
Hettie
message-id471.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
Documents are enclosed.
These are intended for the mailbox of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All our private messages are in pdf format.
Best Regards;
Talisha
message-id248.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- -=| Charles Plessy, 14.07.2007 14:15 |=-
In the meantime, the discussion continued in the BTS where I got an
answer and was informed that Jose made a package which will be uploaded
this week-end.
How does it work with the NEW queue, will the
56 matches
Mail list logo
