Processed: retitle 923766 to ITP: magiclantern -- Canon EOS camera deluxe features by firmware add on
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 923766 ITP: magiclantern -- Canon EOS camera deluxe features by > firmware add on Bug #923766 [wnpp] ITP: magiclantern -- Canon EOS camera deluxe featrues by firmware add on Changed Bug title to 'ITP: magiclantern -- Canon EOS camera deluxe features by firmware add on' from 'ITP: magiclantern -- Canon EOS camera deluxe featrues by firmware add on'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 923766: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=923766 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: owner 923766
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > owner 923766 gur...@phys.ethz.ch Bug #923766 [wnpp] ITP: magiclantern -- Canon EOS camera deluxe features by firmware add on Owner recorded as gur...@phys.ethz.ch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 923766: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=923766 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#923767: RFP: node-runas -- Run command synchronously
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: node-runas Version : 3.1.1 Upstream Author : Microsoft * URL : https://salsa.debian.org/themusicgod1-guest/ * License : MIT Programming Lang: c Description : Run command synchronously Launches a new process with the given command, with command line arguments in args. This function is synchronous and returns the exit code when the command finished. runas is a dependency of meteor ( #842425 ).
Bug#923766: ITP: magiclantern -- Canon EOS camera deluxe featrues by firmware add on
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: magiclantern Version : 0+git20190405 Upstream Authors: Trammell Hudson * URL : https://magiclantern.fm/ * License : GPL-2 Description : Canon EOS camera deluxe featrues by firmware add on This is a free software add-on that runs from the SD/CF card and adds a host of new features to Canon EOS cameras that weren't included from the factory by Canon. . Supported cameras: - 5D Mark II, III - 6D, 7D, 50D, 60D - 500D/T1i, 550D/T2i, 600D/T3i, 650D/T4i, 700D/T5i - 1100D/T3 - EOS M Package will be availabe at http://phd-sid.ethz.ch/debian/magiclantern/ Interested people join #magiclantern on IRC (irc.gnu.org)
Bug#810285: marked as done (O: apache-mod-auth-ntlm-winbind -- apache2 module for NTLM authentication against Winbind)
Your message dated Tue, 05 Mar 2019 00:53:02 + with message-id and subject line Bug#923739: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #810285, regarding O: apache-mod-auth-ntlm-winbind -- apache2 module for NTLM authentication against Winbind to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 810285: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=810285 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: wnpp Severity: normal I originally packaged this module as it was being used by one of my clients in a project, but they've switched to using libapache2-mod-auth-kerb instead, so I no longer have access to an environment where I can test the package, which means I can't usefully maintain it. I've been wondering whether to request removal instead of orphaning, as NTLM is not very secure by modern standards, as the package description warns: If you're considering using this module, you should be aware that NTLM isn't regarded as very secure by modern standards - even Microsoft no longer recommends its use - and where possible, you probably want to use Kerberos with negotiate auth over https instead (see Debian package libapache2-mod-auth-kerb). AIUI negotiate auth over http (rather than https) suffers from connection hijack issues, but I don't know how it compares in overall security terms with NTLM if you aren't able to use https. So I'm going to just orphan for now. Cheers, Olly signature.asc Description: PGP signature --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.0.0.lorikeet+svn+801-4+rm Dear submitter, as the package apache-mod-auth-ntlm-winbind has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/923739 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---
Bug#918484: marked as done (O: cmdpack -- cd image compress)
Your message dated Tue, 05 Mar 2019 00:50:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#923670: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #918484, regarding O: cmdpack -- cd image compress to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 918484: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=918484 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: wnpp Severity: normal --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 1.03-1+rm Dear submitter, as the package cmdpack has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/923670 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---
Bug#834166: marked as done (O: libcgic -- C library for developing CGI applications)
Your message dated Tue, 05 Mar 2019 00:51:35 + with message-id and subject line Bug#923672: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #834166, regarding O: libcgic -- C library for developing CGI applications to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 834166: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=834166 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: wnpp Severity: normal I hereby orphan this package, since I lack the time and interest to maintain it properly. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 2.05-3+rm Dear submitter, as the package libcgic has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/923672 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---
Bug#918490: marked as done (O: empty-expect -- Run processes and applications under pseudo-terminal)
Your message dated Tue, 05 Mar 2019 00:51:10 + with message-id and subject line Bug#923671: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #918490, regarding O: empty-expect -- Run processes and applications under pseudo-terminal to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 918490: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=918490 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: wnpp Severity: normal --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.6.20b-1+rm Dear submitter, as the package empty-expect has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/923671 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---
Bug#731792: marked as done (O: gmorgan -- MIDI rhythm station emulator software)
Your message dated Tue, 05 Mar 2019 00:50:18 + with message-id and subject line Bug#923669: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #731792, regarding O: gmorgan -- MIDI rhythm station emulator software to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 731792: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=731792 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: wnpp I hereby orphan this package. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.40-1+rm Dear submitter, as the package gmorgan has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/923669 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---
Bug#656728: projekt charytatywny
-- Mam zamiar przekazać ci część mojego majątku jako darowiznę pieniężną w postaci wolnej woli, Odpowiadać, aby wziąć udział. Wang Jianlin Grupa Wanda
Processed: control
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 917366 by 923682 Bug #917366 [wnpp] ITP: postfix-mta-sts-resolver -- daemon that adds support for MTA-STS to postfix 917366 was blocked by: 923676 917366 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 917366: 923682 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 917366: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=917366 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#844452: ITA: json-c -- JSON manipulation library
On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 02:36:07PM -0800, Cameron Norman wrote: > Control: retitle -1 ITA: json-c -- JSON manipulation library > > I intend to adopt this package. Hi Cameron ! Thanks for your interest in adopting this package. FYI, I started a transition for a new version of json-c (0.13.1+dfsg-2), cf: #904418 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-json-c.html It is blocked on some reverse dependencies that do not build cleanly with the new version, but we can get that in after Buster is released. Best, nicoo signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#879665: node-prettier and its depends
Hello. I see some RFPs submitted for packaging node modules which are part of node-prettier. Is it fine if we ask GSoC applicants to complete this RFPs for evaluating them. --abhijith
Bug#894722: RFP: loomio-installer - install loomio collaborative decision making platform
Hola , I observed that Its been long 5 months for any activity towards loomio-installer package, i would like to take this task for packaging it . and make it an active package again .
Bug#626078: re
I have a proposal for you kindly email me at mrssuyinc7...@gmail.com --? ? This electronic message, together with any attachments is confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient: 1.do not copy, disclose or use the contents in any way. 2.please let me know by return email immediately and then destroy the message. Waikato DHB is not responsible for any changes made to this message and/or any attachments after sending by Waikato DHB. Before opening or using attachments, check them for viruses and effects. Waikato DHB takes no responsibility for affected attachments. Click on link www.waikatodhb.health.nz/disclaimer to view the company policy website. If you are not redirected to the company policy website then copy and paste the URL into a new browser window. __ This email has been filtered by SMX. For more information visit http://smxemail.com __
Bug#823037: ITP: flatbuffers -- efficient cross platform serialization library
¡Hola Bálint! El 2019-03-04 a las 00:23 +0100, Bálint Réczey escribió: With the following changes IMO the package would be ready for upload: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/flatbuffers/merge_requests/1 Currently the salsa ci rules test the build against reprotest, and it fails. The log mentions that the issue might be due to the use of __DATE__ but that gets set by the SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH [1] (using the time and date from the last debian/changelog entry). diffoscope shows the presence of the build paths in the generated binaries, I'm not sure how to avoid that. If you know how to fix this, or you are interested in fixing this, please go ahead and make flatbuffers reproducible, otherwise, please disable the reprotest in the salsa ci pipeline. Happy hacking, [1]: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/TimestampsFromCPPMacros -- "EIEIO Go home and have a glass of warm, dairy-fresh milk" -- The GNU C Library Reference Manual, Chapter 2.2, Error Codes Saludos /\/\ /\ >< `/ signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#921716: ITP: icingaweb2-module-ipl -- icingaweb2 php library
Hi David, On 2019-03-04 11:32, Kunz David wrote: On Sat, 2019-03-02 at 09:48 +0100, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: Just noticed this package in the NEW queue, and I wonder why you aren't maintaining this package within the Nagios team where icinga2 & icingaweb2 are also maintained. Thank you for your interest; I'll be packaging a bunch of modules and once they're done, I might consider joining the team at a later point. That is the wrong order. The icingaweb2-module packages should be maintained in the same team as icingweb2 from the start. What are you trying to achieve by packaging this module? It is a dependency for various icingaweb modules, see my other ITPs. Since you intent to package most icingaweb2 modules, these really need to be maintained in the same team as icingaweb2. As the only active contributor to the icingaweb2 package I strongly urge you to join the team and maintain these packages within it. You will be on your own otherwise, I will not keep your packages in consideration if they are not part of the team when updating the icingaweb2 package. Kind Regards, Bas
Bug#920417: icingaweb2 module packages should be maintained alongside icingaweb2 in the Nagios team
As discussed in the icingaweb2-module-ipl ITP (#921716), the icingaweb2 module packages should be maintained alongside icingaweb2 in the Nagios team. Kind Regards, Bas
