Your message dated Tue, 16 Apr 2024 03:03:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1069021: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1036352,
regarding O: msp430-libc -- Standard C library for TI MSP430 development
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Tue, 16 Apr 2024 03:04:21 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1069021: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1036350,
regarding ITA: gcc-msp430 -- GNU C compiler (cross compiler for MSP430)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
On 2024-04-15 23:02:20, Matthias Geiger wrote:
> On 15.04.24 22:59, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>> On 2024-04-15 22:22:04, Matthias Geiger wrote:
>>> On 15.04.24 21:01, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
On 2023-12-22 00:15:30, Matthias Geiger wrote:
> Once the StarBook VI AMD get mainline coreboot
On 15.04.24 22:59, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
On 2024-04-15 22:22:04, Matthias Geiger wrote:
On 15.04.24 21:01, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
On 2023-12-22 00:15:30, Matthias Geiger wrote:
Once the StarBook VI AMD get mainline coreboot support I will adopt this
package.
Hi!
It would be nice to see
On 2024-04-15 22:22:04, Matthias Geiger wrote:
> On 15.04.24 21:01, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>> On 2023-12-22 00:15:30, Matthias Geiger wrote:
>>> Once the StarBook VI AMD get mainline coreboot support I will adopt this
>>> package.
>> Hi!
>>
>> It would be nice to see this come through! Do you
On 15.04.24 21:01, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
On 2023-12-22 00:15:30, Matthias Geiger wrote:
Once the StarBook VI AMD get mainline coreboot support I will adopt this
package.
Hi!
It would be nice to see this come through! Do you still intend on
adopting this package, and if so, when will StarBook
On 2023-12-22 00:15:30, Matthias Geiger wrote:
> Once the StarBook VI AMD get mainline coreboot support I will adopt this
> package.
Hi!
It would be nice to see this come through! Do you still intend on
adopting this package, and if so, when will StarBook get that nice
update? :)
a.
--
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 1067116 by 1069058
Bug #1067116 [wnpp] ITP: libhyprcursor -- hyprland cursor format, library and
utilities
1067116 was not blocked by any bugs.
1067116 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 1067116: 1069058
>
End of message,
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Maytham Alsudany
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian...@lists.debian.org,
nil...@debian.org
* Package name: golang-github-edwvee-exiffix
Version : 0.0~git20240229.0dbb146
Upstream Contact:
On Fri, 15 Mar 2024 14:21:17 + Julian Gilbey wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 10:03:44AM -0400, Louis-Philippe Véronneau wrote:
> Quick update, having taken a peek at the package: the version
> currently in unstable is quite old - it is a version that did not
> require rapidfuzz. So I will
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> owner 1069035 gur...@phys.ethz.ch
Bug #1069035 [wnpp] ITP: objconv -- object file converter
Owner changed from Alex Myczko to gur...@phys.ethz.ch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1069035:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alex Myczko
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: objconv
Version : 2.54+ds
Upstream Authors: Agner Fog
URL : object file converter
* License : GPL-3.0-or-later
Description : object file
Processing control commands:
> block 1066893 by -1
Bug #1066893 [wnpp] ITP: vale -- A markup-aware linter for prose built with
speed and extensibility in mind.
1066893 was blocked by: 1068995 1068993 1068992 1068994
1066893 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 1066893: 1069026
>
It's also worth noting that it's probably a better idea to version based off of
commits rather than
tags. I've noticed that both forgejo and archiver depend on the latest commit,
rather than 0.0.1.
So changelog should list 0.0.2~git20230904.39efe44 instead of 0.0.1.
Kind regards,
Maytham
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Maytham Alsudany
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian...@lists.debian.org
Control: block 1066893 by -1
Control: block -1 by 1043408
* Package name: golang-github-mholt-archiver
Version : 3.5.1
Upstream Contact:
Hi Nilesh,
Since Nisha hasn't replied, then I'll reply :)
> I wanted to ask a couple of questions before I start with a review:
>
> * Is there a package that needs dsnet/compress? If so, which one - and
> is it a crucial dependency?
For me, this is an indirect dependency of vale[1]
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 1030610
Bug #1030610 [wnpp] ITP: python-recipe-scrapers -- simple web scraping tool for
recipe sites.
Marked Bug as done
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1030610:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 1065419 by 1064586
Bug #1065419 [wnpp] ITP: sail-ocaml -- Sail architecture definition language
1065419 was blocked by: 1067819 1068621 1065658
1065419 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 1065419: 1064586
> thanks,
Unknown
According to https://github.com/xiph/rnnoise/releases/tag/v0.2 >,
the new version just released was been trained on only publicly
available data. Time to see if rnnoise can go into Debian?
--
Happy hacking
Petter Reinholdtsen
Jonas Smedegaard writes:
> I am happy that gnulib is in good hands.
>
> I've moved on to other challenges, and have no interest in working on
> gnulib now. That said, you are welcome to try nudge me if some concrete
> task emerges where you image I might be of help.
Thank you for support!
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Edward Betts
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: python-btsocket
Version : 0.2.0
Upstream Author : Barry Byford
* URL : https://github.com/ukBaz/python-btsocket
* License
21 matches
Mail list logo
