Bug#1053294: RFP: auto-cpufreq -- Automatic CPU speed & power optimizer

[Adnan Hodzic]

Hi everyone,

First of all thank you for creating this RFP Antoine! I might be biased
when I say this, but I think auto-cpufreq definitely deserves and should be
available in Debian repos. There's even a long standing auto-cpufreq issue
(feature request) to create a Debian package for it:
https://github.com/AdnanHodzic/auto-cpufreq/issues/157

Although I used to be Debian package maintainer myself in past, and since I
naively thought auto-cpufreq future was set with having it available as
part of a Snap Store/packages (which I even praised in my KubeCon talk:
https://youtu.be/issubK49f6E?si=k6sXJCIFxUIYnbLh=378). After auto-cpufreq
v2.0 release with introduction of GUI due to its confinement limitations,
this feature won't be possible with Snap package and it could lead to its
deprecation in future:
https://github.com/AdnanHodzic/auto-cpufreq/#snap-store

Either way, it would be great if someone had time to have auto-cpufreq
packaged for Debian. I'm at your disposal if you have any questions in this
process. Otherwise, if I have time in the future I might even pick this up
myself :)

Regards,

Adnan


On Sun, Oct 1, 2023 at 4:42 AM Antoine Beaupre  wrote:

> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> X-Debbugs-Cc: Adnan Hodzic 
>
> * Package name: auto-cpufreq
>   Version : 2.0.0
>   Upstream Contact: Adnan Hodzic 
> * URL : https://github.com/AdnanHodzic/auto-cpufreq
> * License : LGPL-3
>   Programming Lang: Python
>   Description : Automatic CPU speed & power optimizer
>
> Automatic CPU speed & power optimizer for, Linux based on active
> monitoring of a laptop's battery state, CPU usage, CPU temperature and
> system load. Ultimately allowing you to improve battery life without
> making any compromises.
>
> Features:
>
>
>  * Monitoring
>* Basic system information
>* CPU frequency (system total & per core)
>* CPU usage (system total & per core)
>* CPU temperature (total average & per core)
>* Battery state
>* System load
>  * CPU frequency scaling, governor and turbo boost management based on
>* Battery state
>* CPU usage (total & per core)
>* CPU temperature in combination with CPU utilization/load (prevent
> overheating)
>* System load
>  * Automatic CPU & power optimization (temporary and persistent)
>
>
> 
>
> I found this package through this post on Debian Planet:
>
> https://foolcontrol.org/?p=4603
>
> This is a tool similar to already existing tools in Debian,
> specifically TLP. According to the auto-cpufreq author though:
>
> > Using tools like TLP can help in this situation with extending
> > battery life (which is something I used to do for numerous years),
> > but it also might come with its own set of problems, like losing
> > turbo boost.
> >
> > With that said, I needed a simple tool which would automatically
> > make "cpufreq" related changes, save battery like TLP, but let Linux
> > kernel do most of the heavy lifting. That's how auto-cpufreq was
> > born.
> >
> > Please note: auto-cpufreq aims to replace TLP in terms of
> > functionality and after you install auto-cpufreq it's recommended to
> > remove TLP. If both are used for same functionality, i.e: to set CPU
> > frequencies it'll lead to unwanted results like overheating. Hence,
> > only use both tools in tandem if you know what you're doing.
>
> So I'm not exactly clear on what the overlap between the two is, but I
> do feel there's some room in this space for another option. TLP is
> rather "heavy" in terms of the number of things it does, it's a rather
> big pill to swallow, with all sorts of pitfalls...
>
> I like the idea of having a simple, one-task-focused tool.
>
> I do not currently have the cycles to evaluate this any further, but
> would love to collaborate on further research when I have time.
>
> Otherwise, if anyone is interested in pursuing this any further,
> please go right ahead (but keep this bug in CC!).
>

Bug#768073: LXC team take over ITP?

[Adnan Hodzic]

Awesome!

Looking forward to any updates you may have in regards to golang-deps.

On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 11:37 PM, Jonathan Dowland <j...@debian.org> wrote:

> On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 08:17:09PM +0200, Adnan Hodzic wrote:
> > Jonathan and everybody else,
> >
> > Since I couldn't find my original LXD package source, I started from
> > scratch.
> >
> > I created new Git repo (pkg-lxc/lxd.git) and pushed initial Debian
> package
> > of LXD 2.4.1 (Yakkety release). Git repo is available on Alioth:
> > https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-lxc/lxd.git
>
> Great, thanks!
>
> > Building the package will fail due to missing golang-* deps which ATM are
> > missing in Debian. I can't remember if the original list of missing
> > dependencies was this long, but this is what we we're currently dealing
> > with:
>
> I've updated the list at https://wiki.debian.org/LXD accordingly.
>
> > Has pkg-go team been notified of this problem? And are they willing to
> > package these for Debian?
>
> I have joined pkg-go and tackled one of the dependencies (with a second
> incoming) but I hadn't thought to msg the team with this list, I will do
> that too.
>
> Thanks!
>



-- 
Adnan

Bug#768073: LXC team take over ITP?

[Adnan Hodzic]

Jonathan and everybody else,

Since I couldn't find my original LXD package source, I started from
scratch.

I created new Git repo (pkg-lxc/lxd.git) and pushed initial Debian package
of LXD 2.4.1 (Yakkety release). Git repo is available on Alioth:
https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-lxc/lxd.git

Building the package will fail due to missing golang-* deps which ATM are
missing in Debian. I can't remember if the original list of missing
dependencies was this long, but this is what we we're currently dealing
with:

---

Unmet build dependencies: golang-any-shared-dev golang-go.crypto-dev
golang-context-dev golang-github-gorilla-mux-dev
golang-github-gosexy-gettext-dev golang-github-mattn-go-colorable-dev
golang-github-mattn-go-sqlite3-dev golang-github-olekukonko-tablewriter-dev
golang-github-pborman-uuid-dev golang-gocapability-dev
golang-gopkg-flosch-pongo2.v3-dev golang-gopkg-inconshreveable-log15.v2-dev
golang-gopkg-lxc-go-lxc.v2-dev golang-gopkg-tomb.v2-dev golang-petname-dev
golang-yaml.v2-dev golang-websocket-dev

---

Has pkg-go team been notified of this problem? And are they willing to
package these for Debian?

Let me know if you have any additional questions and/or comments.

On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 7:49 PM, Adnan Hodzic <ad...@hodzic.org> wrote:

> Jonathan,
>
> >> Awhile back I started packaging process. I basically re-packaged the LXD
> >> Ubuntu package. As Evgeni mentioned it "is what we did with the other
> LXC
> >> components and that worked out pretty well so far."
> >
> >Do you have that lying around, and if so is it worth us pushing it to a
> git
> >repo for pkg-lxc?
>
> I think it is, as once golang dependencies are satisfied, we can push it
> into Debian.
>
> Let me look in what state I left it in, also I want to update it to the
> latest lxd version and I'll push into pkg-lxc git repo. If there are no
> objections?
>
> I'll do this this weekend.
>
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 6:13 PM, Jonathan Dowland <j...@debian.org> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 12:35:24AM +0200, Adnan Hodzic wrote:
>> > Awhile back I started packaging process. I basically re-packaged the LXD
>> > Ubuntu package. As Evgeni mentioned it "is what we did with the other
>> LXC
>> > components and that worked out pretty well so far."
>>
>> Do you have that lying around, and if so is it worth us pushing it to a
>> git
>> repo for pkg-lxc?
>>
>> > At this point, I think we just need to align the efforts between pkg-go
>> and
>> > pkg-lxc teams, and we'll see LXD in Debian in no time.
>>
>> I've just joined both teams and opened an ITP for golang-petname. I've
>> got a
>> package prepared pending a few questions on the pkg-go list, I should get
>> it
>> into NEW Tomorrow. Then perhaps I can start on the others next week.
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> --
>> Jonathan Dowland
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Adnan
>



-- 
Adnan

Bug#768073: LXC team take over ITP?

[Adnan Hodzic]

Jonathan,

>> Awhile back I started packaging process. I basically re-packaged the LXD
>> Ubuntu package. As Evgeni mentioned it "is what we did with the other LXC
>> components and that worked out pretty well so far."
>
>Do you have that lying around, and if so is it worth us pushing it to a git
>repo for pkg-lxc?

I think it is, as once golang dependencies are satisfied, we can push it
into Debian.

Let me look in what state I left it in, also I want to update it to the
latest lxd version and I'll push into pkg-lxc git repo. If there are no
objections?

I'll do this this weekend.

On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 6:13 PM, Jonathan Dowland <j...@debian.org> wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 12:35:24AM +0200, Adnan Hodzic wrote:
> > Awhile back I started packaging process. I basically re-packaged the LXD
> > Ubuntu package. As Evgeni mentioned it "is what we did with the other LXC
> > components and that worked out pretty well so far."
>
> Do you have that lying around, and if so is it worth us pushing it to a git
> repo for pkg-lxc?
>
> > At this point, I think we just need to align the efforts between pkg-go
> and
> > pkg-lxc teams, and we'll see LXD in Debian in no time.
>
> I've just joined both teams and opened an ITP for golang-petname. I've got
> a
> package prepared pending a few questions on the pkg-go list, I should get
> it
> into NEW Tomorrow. Then perhaps I can start on the others next week.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Jonathan Dowland
>



-- 
Adnan

Bug#768073: LXC team take over ITP?

[Adnan Hodzic]

Hey Jonathan (and everybody else),

Sorry about delayed reply.

> Adnan, how's it going?

Awhile back I started packaging process. I basically re-packaged the LXD
Ubuntu package. As Evgeni mentioned it "is what we did with the other LXC
components and that worked out pretty well so far."

However, with LXD, build would fail due to all the "golang-* dependencies
which are missing from Debian. I also planned on re-packaging these as
well, but I got sidetracked by things from "real life".

>There's a pkg-lxc team already. Since this package is/will be very
inter-related to
>LXC, perhaps it should be developed in that team? Team CCed. Are they
interested?
>Are you in pkg-lxc already?

I think Evgeni, gave a perfect answer for this one:

>Yes, Adnan is in pkg-lxc and technically the team is interested
>(given it falls into the same software stack) to have the whole stack
available in Debian.

...

>What's the state of the Ubuntu package? Could that make a good starting
point? How
>much hacking before that would be suitable for an experimental upload at
least?

Basically if we resolved the issue with missing golang-* dependencies, we
could probably have it uploaded within same day.

@Anthony and @Evgeni,

>> I took a quick look at the package source obtained via:
>>
>> dget -u http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/l/lxd/lxd_2.2-
0ubuntu1.dsc
>>...
>> So, I guess the first step would be to package
>> golang-gopkg-flosch-pongo2.v3, golang-gopkg-inconshreveable-log15.v2,
>> golang-gopkg-lxc-go-lxc.v2 and golang-petname, or simply grab these
>> existing Ubuntu packages, make a few minor changes to debian/control
>> and debian/changelog, file ITPs to the Debian BTS, and finally upload
>> them to Debian.
>>
>> I do not see too many hurdles after that, at least I hope not.  ;-)
>
>IIRC that's similar to what Adnan told me the last time we talked about
LXD.

Yep, this is our only and main obstacle.

>> Also, should the Debian lxd be team-maintained by the pkg-lxc team or
>> the pkg-go team?  What do you think?
>
>Whatever works? :-)
>Stack-wise it's more pkg-lxc, language-wise pkg-go...
>I'd guess it will need coordination to both, LXC and other Go uploads at
times too.

I love this suggestion. If we could make this cooridnation happen, and both
teams do their part of the job that would be the perfect fusion.

I admit and acknowledge your frustration about this ITP being here for this
long. I think I explained why I stopped where I stopped, but I also admit
that I could've been more update to date with my communication.

If anyone wants to "hijack" this ITP from me, be my guest. Regardless, I
would still like to do the work that I claimed the responsibility for, and
get LXD into Debian.

At this point, I think we just need to align the efforts between pkg-go and
pkg-lxc teams, and we'll see LXD in Debian in no time.

Bug#775021: ITP: lxcfs -- FUSE filesystem for LXC

[Adnan Hodzic]

Yes, as of today there's starting to be some progress on it :)

I apologize for delayed reply, as I was incredibly busy! But I still plan
on getting this package into Debian.

On Sat, Jan 2, 2016 at 3:40 PM, Evgeni Golov  wrote:

> Hi Adnan,
> On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 11:35:14AM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> > * Package name : lxcfs
>
> Is there any progress on this? I'd love to see lxcfs in Debian :)
> I did try the Ubuntu packaging and it compiles and runs fine on Debian,
> so it could be used as a start.
>
> Greets
> Evgeni
>

Bug#768073: ITP: lxd - The Linux Container Daemon

[Adnan Hodzic]

Hi Jonathan,

When Daniel orphaned this package I got ownership of this ITP. As during
DebConf I've expressed a wish to work on it.

Due to a lot of things happening in my life, I was too busy and didn't have
time to work on it yet.

But starting today, I'm starting on my work to get LXD into Debian. Stay
tuned and thanks for your understanding.


Regards,

Adnan

On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 4:50 PM, Jonathan Dowland  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> This ITP is now over a year old. Is this package still being worked on?
> Is there a public WIP repository or packages that people can see yet
> please?
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Jonathan Dowland
>

Bug#770087: ITP: corebird -- Native Gtk+ Twitter client for the Linux desktop

[Adnan Hodzic]

Hey Philip,

Edward Betts and I agreed to co-maintain this package. However after that
we met on DebConf15 and we decided we won't maintain it  after all.

Package was created and ready to go, so please cherry-pick whatever you
need (git://4angle.com/git/corebird.git)

You're free to take ownership of this ITP and I wish you all the best. I'm
hoping we'll see corebird as a package in Debian soon.

Let me know if you have any other questions and/or comments.

Adnan

On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Philip Rinn  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> to give people the chance to build corebird themselves I prepared a
> package and
> uploaded it to mentors:
>
> http://mentors.debian.net/package/corebird
>
> From my point of view this could be uploaded right away - Adnan, could you
> please
> comment if you plan to make an upload soon or if you are willing to hand
> over this
> ITP. You last comment on this ITP was over seven month ago.
>
> Best,
> Philip
>
>

Bug#770087: Sorry, I missed your ITP

[Adnan Hodzic]

Yup!

On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Edward Betts edw...@4angle.com wrote:

 Adnan Hodzic ad...@hodzic.org wrote:
  But now that Jessie has been released. I'll have it pushed once again and
  let's see what happens then. Once I get it in Debian, maybe we can even
  co-maintain together?

 I'm up for co-maintaining, we can make a alioth project. Are you okay with
 git
 for revision control?
 --
 Edward.

Bug#770087: Sorry, I missed your ITP

[Adnan Hodzic]

Hey Edward,

Yea, I had it packaged few months ago and in queue for upload. But then my
sponsor told me to drop it for the time being because all efforts were put
into getting Jessie released.

But now that Jessie has been released. I'll have it pushed once again and
let's see what happens then. Once I get it in Debian, maybe we can even
co-maintain together?


On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Edward Betts edw...@4angle.com wrote:

 Hi Adnan,

 I missed your ITP for corebird and filed my own ITP by mistake. How is your
 package coming along? I have a package for corebird 1.0 ready for upload, I
 was looking for a sponsor:

 http://mentors.debian.net/package/corebird

 Obviously I don't want to tread on your toes. I'm not going to steal the
 package from you. Feel free to use anything from my attempt at packaging
 corebird in your package.
 --
 Edward.

Bug#770087: ITP: corebird -- Native Gtk+ Twitter client for the Linux desktop

[Adnan Hodzic]

Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Adnan Hodzic ad...@hodzic.org


* Package name : Corebird
  Version : 0.9
  Upstream Author : Timm Baeder
* URL : http://corebird.baedert.org
* License : (GPL3)
  Programming Lang : (C++, vala)
  Description : Native Gtk+ Twitter client for the Linux desktop

Corebird is a modern, easy and fun Twitter client,
just what you were looking for, right?

Bug#711471:

[Adnan Hodzic]

Hello,

Can somebody please tell me what's the status of this request, is it still
RFP? Because I might be interested in doing the packaging work if no one
has different plans for it anymore.

Please inform me if you have any comments or questions.

Adnan

Bug#459219: ITP: android

[Adnan Hodzic]

I generally agree with what Laszlo and you said, and android-tools
(adb, fastboot and perhaps others?) package should appear in Debian as
soon as possible. If I can help in any way to make that goal happen,
please do let me know.

On the other side, I still haven't given up on my idea of
android-sdk-installer.

More info:
http://foolcontrol.org/?p=1545
and/or
http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2012/07/android-sdk-installer-for-linux-debianubuntu

Which bundles all the components from udev rules over Eclipse plugin
to SDK itself into single package. I just need more time to realize
this idea, as currently I'm the only one working on it and this isn't
my full time job.


Adnan

On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Matt Taggart tagg...@debian.org wrote:
 Thanks for working on getting the android development stuff packaged!

 I think I agree with what Laszlo said about having separate package for
 some things (although mainly at the binary package level, I guess I don't
 care at the source package level).

 I don't need to develop android applications, I mainly just need adb and
 fastboot in order to talk to and boot my devices. I found these (slightly
 older, but maybe still relevant) howtos

 http://lackingrhoticity.blogspot.com/2010/02/how-to-build-adb-android-debugg
 er.html
 http://mancoosi.org/~abate/build-android-adb-debian-sid-amd64

 It would be nice to be able to install adb without having to install the
 whole SDK and java (and avoid downloading binaries and weird licenses, etc).

 What do you think?

 Thanks,

 --
 Matt Taggart
 tagg...@debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/calbgxzmkumhsnhdkewvjrn8vmbrxxip8huebjv4kw9pylag...@mail.gmail.com

Bug#459219: android-tools packaging

[Adnan Hodzic]

First of all, I'd like to apologize for not replying for so long, I
was too busy with this thing called life. But am now ready to get back
to work and finish this project.

+Marcin,

On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 9:42 PM, Marcin Juszkiewicz 
marcin.juszkiew...@linaro.org wrote:
 I was too busy for last few days so I didn't even get to reply.
 Either way, just now I publicly published what I have when it comes
 to android-sdk-installer script. And yes, I'd rather have all those
 tools as one package as I originally intended if you don't mind.

 I am fine with it. But do you cover !i386 !amd64 architectures? There
 are people who are using armel/armhf/mipsel laptops/netbooks and Android
 devices at same time.

At this point no, but it's good you brought my attention to it as it
can easily be implemented in the script. In the script itself I
commented a part which says to implement multiarch support. So I guess
that part would take care of the !386  !amd64 architectures.

+Jeremy,

 On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 9:26 PM, Jeremy Bicha jbi...@ubuntu.com wrote:
 android-tools (providing android-tools-adb and android-tools-fastboot)
 has now been packaged in Ubuntu. I think this would be a great help to
 Android ROM users, especially since I believe Google doesn't make
 these available as a simple download for Linux amd64 users. At least
 it's not at http://developer.android.com/sdk

 I think those two binaries should be easier and faster to get into
 Debian than the full Android SDK.

 https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/android-tools

*thumbs up

Looks great, proper naming too, however the only thing I'm curious
about. Why not have all the tools (even tho users might not use even
1/3 of them)?

In my script this is handled by Android SDK Starter Package which
installs *all* the tools, please see line: 315 to ~364

https://github.com/AdnanHodzic/android-sdk-installer/blob/master/android-sdk-installer

+Laszlo,

On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) g...@debian.hu 
wrote:
 Hi Marcin, Adnan,

 I think this ITP should be several ones. One for command like tools like
 adb , one for Eclipse plugin and one for the emulator at least.
 ATM Adnan's work is great. I'm a DD and just changed bits in his
 packaging to be perfect.

Thank you for appreciating my work.
Which bits did you change because I don't see any chances in the code.

Also why do you think we should separate them in couple of pieces
instead of having the installer which could let you select which
pieces you want and which you don't?

 I think it should be uploaded (ie, the android-tools package). Most
 users will need only adb and fastboot. The other parts can be packaged
 later. Would you let me file an ITP for android-tools and upload it?
 I've set myself as the maintainer and Adnan as uploader.

I personally would like to have it all in a single package, thus why I
started working on this installer.

In case we do decide to the way you suggested above, besides being an
uploader do you mind me being a maintainer together with you? Because
I really do have great interest in future of this package.


Adnan


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CALbGxZ=bten4qduzytpb0mssyndwz+xg8dgt6a5f23+5yqy...@mail.gmail.com

Bug#609278: maybe retitle?

[Adnan Hodzic]

You're right, thank you for this observation. I'll do as you said as it
seems right now I don't plan on continuing working on this packages
implementation in Debian.

Adnan

On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 2:56 PM, David Bremner brem...@debian.org wrote:

 Hi Adnan,

 I just came across this bug in a discussion on IRC today. Perhaps if you
 don't expect to work on this further (unless the situation changes), you
 could retitle the bug to an RFP, to allow people to more quickly
 understand the state of things.

 All the best,

 David

Bug#459219: Android tools

[Adnan Hodzic]

I was too busy for last few days so I didn't even get to reply. Either
way, just now I publicly published what I have when it comes to
android-sdk-installer script. And yes, I'd rather have all those
tools as one package as I originally intended if you don't mind.

android-sdk-installer for Linux (Debian/Ubuntu): http://foolcontrol.org/?p=1545

Later on I'll publish this same post on OMG! Ubuntu so hopefully
this whole thing gets some momentum.


Adnan

On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 8:31 AM, Marcin Juszkiewicz
marcin.juszkiew...@linaro.org wrote:
 Hello

 I packaged Android tools (adb + fastboot) and provide it for Ubuntu in
 Linaro Tools PPA [1] and also as source on my website [2].

 Can you tell me does it have a sense to add it into Debian or rather
 wait for your Android SDK packages which will provide those tools?


 1. https://launchpad.net/~linaro-maintainers/+archive/tools/
 2. http://marcin.juszkiewicz.com.pl/~hrw/debian/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/calbgxznap7loqnul5q+ub0hcxt7ke2iodcoqy2zen4fyjh5...@mail.gmail.com

Bug#459219: Ping wrt Android SDK

[Adnan Hodzic]

Hello Christoph,

Sorry for the delayed reply, I was in Las Vegas over a weekend and
didn't have much time to handle emails. Regarding Android SDK and this
ITP I have no larger problems, I'm just busy as after graduating from
University I'm too busy with finding a real job.

This May as part of my University Capstone project I wrote a paper and
released first version of android-sdk-linux script which when
finished should be packaged. If you're interested you take a look at
Implementation of Android SDK into Debian Linux for more info:

http://foolcontrol.org/cloud/public.php?service=filestoken=8966c6a58763835559f7a0e400c1324e21e74842file=/Documents/cita%20481%20-%20capstone/Implementation%20of%20Android%20SDK%20into%20Debian%20Linux.pdf

Even thought it's all been said in the paper my plans for future is to
finish the script, upload it to one of the distributed version control
systems (GIT?) and upload the first version of the android-sdk-linux
Debian package.


Regards,

Adnan

On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 7:06 PM, Christoph Egger christ...@debian.org wrote:
 Hi!

   Just wondering how are you coming along with the Android SDK package
 (I'm mostly interested in fastboot and adb tools)? Some larger Problems
 still to solve or just busy?

 Regards

 Christoph

 --
 9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857  70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731
 Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CALbGxZ=j8neuedqtojglg2bb4mnpqsmsr0e-v_zxesa84h_...@mail.gmail.com

Bug#609278: any progress

[Adnan Hodzic]

No, nor does it seem there will be any. Please refer to
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=609278#67 for more
information.


Regards,

Adnan

On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Patrick Winnertz win...@debian.org wrote:
 Hey,

 is there any progress on packaging unity for debian atm?


 Greetings
 Winnie





-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CALbGxZ=3d=voJnPF=wguygbetytxskxtvj6z_5imo--ct9k...@mail.gmail.com

Bug#459219: your mail

[Adnan Hodzic]

 Would you mind sharing with #459219 your progress on this packaging ?
No I wouldn't mind sharing my progress on this package as I'm of
opinion that all of us could only benefit from one such thing.

For last ~4 years this ITP has been up, in this last ~10 days since
I've changed the ITP ownership to my name I believe I did great
progress on the same. I was even thinking of releasing a first build
of the same this week, but other life obligations prevented me doing
so.

First I was thinking of releasing a semi-automatic installer which
would guide you through the installation process, dialogs asking you
which version/s (API's) you want installed/and or other components and
ability to install the ADT plugin for Eclipse.

In the end I don't know how much sense this makes at this point and
concluded that these should released as separate packages, at least
the android sdk and adt plugin. When it comes to the sdk I'm almost
finished building the package and just want to test it out more before
pushing it to unstable and *hopefully* it'll happen this following
week.

When it comes to ADT Plugin, I haven't got too far with this as
Eclipse currently FTBFS but this too should happen very soon.
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Olivier Berger ober...@ouvaton.org wrote:
 Hi.

 On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 07:06:16PM +0100, Adnan Hodzic wrote:
 retitle 459219 ITP: android -- Android SDK (mobile phone platform)
 owner 459219 !
 thanks


 Would you mind sharing with #459219 your progress on this packaging ?

 Thanks in advance.

 Best regards,
 --
 Olivier BERGER
 (OpenPGP: 4096R/7C5BB6A5)
 http://www.olivierberger.com/weblog/



-- 
Adnan



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/calbgxzmvwtfqippymzo61kdwwjrt_ze_0nt1sgtxzi7xl3n...@mail.gmail.com

Bug#609278: ITP: Unity -- Interface for Ubuntu Desktop Edition

[Adnan Hodzic]

Hello Matthias,

 I wanted to ask wether there is any progress of packaging Unity for Debian.

To be absolutely honest it hasn't moved from ground zero and I'll
tell you all about it as I go through this email.

  I would love to have it in Debian.

So would I, and from point Unity was even announced to move from
netbooks to desktop back on DebConf10 I saw this as a great
opportunity to have Unity in Debian and for Debian to move closer to
its goal as being the Universal Operating System.

 If there is anything I can help with, I will be happy to try to do so. At the 
 moment I am not sure what has to be done in
 order to get Unity into Debian.

The most I worked on trying to get Unity in Debian was around UDS-N,
especially after Mark announced that it would replace GNOME desktop on
Ubuntu desktop. The main problem was that there was so many
dependencies, even on some of the most trivial packages you would have
to check what the differences were as there would be some kind of
change done in Ubuntu. By the time you'd get caught up with all of it,
there would be a new changes made on Unity and you would be on the
very start, again. As this seemed of more being in infinite loop then
packaging process, and as I was busy with other things such as
organizing DebConf11, university, so on I just paused the whole
process.

I talked about this topic with various people, ranging from users over
developers to project leaders both from Ubuntu and Debian side. Ubuntu
was very interested in this and was very willing to help, even people
from very top of Canonical were interested and I was even asked by
Mark himself back on UDS-O what's happening with this and I told him
as it was. Something along the line that Unity's moving too fast, in
a sense that there's a lot of changes happening to Unity and it's very
hard to catch up on all the dependencies and differences between the
packages.

Now, back on DebConf11, I was too busy with organization and kinda
missed the whole conference, but from what I found out from some
informal talks, to be honest besides few people Debian side wasn't
that interested in having Unity, some didn't even see the whole point
of having another DE.

Second and most important point is, if we want to have Unity in Debian
there has to be more then one or few people working in this process
and the only way it can be done is if the whole team of people working
on it. But as I might have mentioned or hinted I think what prevents
it from getting into Debian at this point is more of a philosophical
nature rather then technical.

When it comes to Unity, with Ubuntu 11.10 we can see that it has
greatly matured from what we saw in 11.04 and that it could be
packaged at this point, but AFAIK there's a lot of happening with
development of Unity 5 for 12.04 release, and maybe this could the
best point to have it packaged and pushed into Debian. I'm saying this
from a point that Debian 7 will be released in some ~6-7 month time
period, at this point even if it gets pushed into Debian by then I
don't see a point of having it in there. Especially from the point
that I highly doubt that Unity 5 will be managed to be pushed into
Debian 7 after its release in Ubuntu 12.04. And I don't know how much
would you like to have current Unity in Debian 7 until Debian 8 gets
released ...

In general, I think why Unity is important and what it means for *all*
Linux distributions was summed in last couple of minutes of UDS-P
keynote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0bOwyGYTMv8feature=youtu.bet=24m48s

After DebConf11 I'm busy with finishing my studies, and want to devote
more time to Java team, as of this point chances of getting Unity into
Debian doesn't look too bright, and as it seems right now all we can
do is give it more time and wait as for some products time is the key
factor. In the end please note that with everything that I said here
I'm not being pessimistic but rather just realistic.


2011/11/17 Matthias Kümmerer matth...@matthias-k.org:
 Hi,

 I wanted to ask wether there is any progress of packaging Unity for Debian. I
 would love to have it in Debian. If there is anything I can help with, I will
 be happy to try to do so. At the moment I am not sure what has to be done in
 order to get Unity into Debian.


 Matthias






-- 
Adnan



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/calbgxzk+d1pa7paus4l+t0dg11fbe7hs+m7qse0jxt+rhcu...@mail.gmail.com

Bug#582884:

[Adnan Hodzic]

Hey Sam,

 If there hasn't been any progress on this I would be extremely
 interested in taking over this.

I have many things on my hands right now and therefor feel free to
take over this package.

Enjoy,

Adnan

On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 6:38 PM, Sam Dunne sam.dunne...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hey there,

 If there hasn't been any progress on this I would be extremely
 interested in taking over this.

 Let me know :)

 --
 Sam Dunne
 BSc Computer Science, UCD Dublin.




-- 
Adnan



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CALbGxZnGUOcEvwPGKteeh+cDJteTqei=vef+77n-_gyjxqr...@mail.gmail.com

Bug#605001:

[Adnan Hodzic]

Hey,

As I don't see any progress on this ITP/RFS I would like to take over
and try to get it into Debian.


Thanks,

Adnan



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/banlktikud8qyagyge92qcxjiaqgv0xy...@mail.gmail.com

Bug#595106: Faenza icon theme

[Adnan Hodzic]

Hey Jonathan,

There's actually been a lot of movement, I made the packages for every
version of Faenza so far, working great, even had the author package
the icons just for Debian. However when it got to mentors for me them
to upload it there would always be some kind of problem even when
there wasn't any. There's even one in mentors right now.

Therefor I had enough and feel free to take it over from here.

Thanks,

Adnan

On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 12:47 AM, Jonathan Carter (highvoltage)
jonat...@ubuntu.com wrote:
 Hi! I notice it's been some months since there's been any movement on
 this bug. I'm a big fan of the icon theme and if you're busy I'm willing
 to take it further. Thanks for your work so far!






-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/BANLkTindVOH1AR=znu0_qkanqqedk4y...@mail.gmail.com

Bug#544499: dropbox-nautilus

[Adnan Hodzic]

Sorry for a very delayed answer.

What's the status with this package, if still possible maybe I could
find time to get it back into Debian.


Adnan

On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org wrote:
 Hi Adnan,

 On Thu, 02 Sep 2010, Adnan Hodzic wrote:
 Alice,

 I still don't see this package inside of Debian (it's been exactly a
 year now), if you don't mind I'd like to take care of this package
 myself.

 Alice retitled the bug into RFP so she's no longer interested in
 creating the package.

 Given that an alternative dropbox got removed from non-free recently,
 would you like to go ahead with this package ?
 (see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610257)

 I would be happy to sponsor it as I use dropbox. Make sure to sort out any
 license issue, obviously. :-)

 Cheers,
 --
 Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer

 Follow my Debian News ▶ http://RaphaelHertzog.com (English)
                      ▶ http://RaphaelHertzog.fr (Français)




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktinmavx+xnbjycvhvk1u718s2-f9mmfo-q_s4...@mail.gmail.com

Bug#609278: Fwd: Bug#609278: [Pkg-ayatana-devel] progress on Unity?

[Adnan Hodzic]

-- Forwarded message --
From: Adnan Hodzic ad...@foolcontrol.org
Date: Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 2:59 PM
Subject: Re: Bug#609278: [Pkg-ayatana-devel] progress on Unity?
To: Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org, 609...@bugs.debian.org
Cc: Jon Dowland j...@debian.org, pkg-ayatana-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org


 On Sun, 20 Mar 2011, Jon Dowland wrote:
 Has there been any progress on this ITP?

 Not that I know. You're welcome to help, Adnan is doing lots of other
 stuff already and pkg-ayatana is largely understaffed in general.

Thank you Raphael for this very thoughtful observation, as it is
absolutely true.

I kind of paused this whole process at the moment, was even thinking
of adding RFH tag to this ITP if that's even possible. Implementation
of Unity into Debian requires immense amount of work to be done, and
I'm not even sure it can be done by one person. Before I paused this
process, huge deal of packages were missing in Debian, even in case
they were present in Debian they required patching. Of course, these
packages could be repackaged directly from Ubuntu as they are already
patched and working nicely in Ubuntu.

Before resuming this process I believe we need to figure out which way
to go. I assume it's patching current Debian packages. As Raphael
already said, I'm doing bunch of other stuff, so help would be highly
appreciated. If I could get extra pair of hands and where we would
divide duties among ourselves I believe this whole process could be
finished relatively fast.


Adnan

On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org wrote:
 Hello Jon,

 On Sun, 20 Mar 2011, Jon Dowland wrote:
 Has there been any progress on this ITP?

 Not that I know. You're welcome to help, Adnan is doing lots of other
 stuff already and pkg-ayatana is largely understaffed in general.

 (I encouraged its creation but I can't take a leading role)

 Cheers,
 --
 Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer

 Follow my Debian News ▶ http://RaphaelHertzog.com (English)
                      ▶ http://RaphaelHertzog.fr (Français)






--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTikKHRvgLcT_wx_g2JTU=l_zscbg3r39v2p5k...@mail.gmail.com

Bug#609278: [Pkg-ayatana-devel] progress on Unity?

[Adnan Hodzic]

 On Sun, 20 Mar 2011, Jon Dowland wrote:
 Has there been any progress on this ITP?

 Not that I know. You're welcome to help, Adnan is doing lots of other
 stuff already and pkg-ayatana is largely understaffed in general.

Thank you Raphael for this very thoughtful observation, as it is
absolutely true.

I kind of paused this whole process at the moment, was even thinking
of adding RFH tag to this ITP if that's even possible. Implementation
of Unity into Debian requires immense amount of work to be done, and
I'm not even sure it can be done by one person. Before I paused this
process, huge deal of packages were missing in Debian, even in case
they were present in Debian they required patching. Of course, these
packages could be repackaged directly from Ubuntu as they are already
patched and working nicely in Ubuntu.

Before resuming this process I believe we need to figure out which way
to go. I assume it's patching current Debian packages. As Raphael
already said, I'm doing bunch of other stuff, so help would be highly
appreciated. If I could get extra pair of hands and where we would
divide duties among ourselves I believe this whole process could be
finished relatively fast.


Adnan

On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org wrote:
 Hello Jon,

 On Sun, 20 Mar 2011, Jon Dowland wrote:
 Has there been any progress on this ITP?

 Not that I know. You're welcome to help, Adnan is doing lots of other
 stuff already and pkg-ayatana is largely understaffed in general.

 (I encouraged its creation but I can't take a leading role)

 Cheers,
 --
 Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer

 Follow my Debian News ▶ http://RaphaelHertzog.com (English)
                      ▶ http://RaphaelHertzog.fr (Français)






--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktikpc4bynccf+uquo4cahnm2cm1r7wxpqvzs4...@mail.gmail.com

Bug#609278: [Pkg-ayatana-devel] Bug#609278: progress on Unity?

[Adnan Hodzic]

 On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 4:20 PM, Andrew Starr-Bochicchio 
 a.star...@gmail.com wrote:

 We should probably have a larger discussion on pkg-ayatana-devel about
 goals/plans for the group in Wheezy, but a first step that would be
 useful would be to make sure http://wiki.debian.org/Ayatana/Packages
 is up-to-date. Currently it only has the packages which integrate into
 GNOME 2.X sessions, not all of the stuff required for Unity. We could
 probably also use a page that tracks/examines what patches to
 non-Ayatana packages that Ubuntu is carrying in order to build Unity.

Great, because I tried to make some sort of  deps check
http://paste.debian.net/plain/105221 (long time ago) wasn't aware
there was http://wiki.debian.org/Ayatana/Packages which is great
because I was thinking of re-packaging indicator-* stuff first and
I'll make sure I update the list.

I'll redo the whole process, and will report back on the results on
what happens.

 Also, it should be noted that Unity is currently implemented as a
 plugin to the Compiz 0.9.x branch. Which is only in experimental, so
 uploads need to be targeted there.

I agree, all uploads should be in experimental.


Adnan

On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 4:20 PM, Andrew Starr-Bochicchio
a.star...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 9:59 AM, Adnan Hodzic ad...@foolcontrol.org wrote:
 On Sun, 20 Mar 2011, Jon Dowland wrote:
 Has there been any progress on this ITP?

 Not that I know. You're welcome to help, Adnan is doing lots of other
 stuff already and pkg-ayatana is largely understaffed in general.

 Thank you Raphael for this very thoughtful observation, as it is
 absolutely true.

 I kind of paused this whole process at the moment, was even thinking
 of adding RFH tag to this ITP if that's even possible. Implementation
 of Unity into Debian requires immense amount of work to be done, and
 I'm not even sure it can be done by one person. Before I paused this
 process, huge deal of packages were missing in Debian, even in case
 they were present in Debian they required patching. Of course, these
 packages could be repackaged directly from Ubuntu as they are already
 patched and working nicely in Ubuntu.

 Before resuming this process I believe we need to figure out which way
 to go. I assume it's patching current Debian packages. As Raphael
 already said, I'm doing bunch of other stuff, so help would be highly
 appreciated. If I could get extra pair of hands and where we would
 divide duties among ourselves I believe this whole process could be
 finished relatively fast.

 We should probably have a larger discussion on pkg-ayatana-devel about
 goals/plans for the group in Wheezy, but a first step that would be
 useful would be to make sure http://wiki.debian.org/Ayatana/Packages
 is up-to-date. Currently it only has the packages which integrate into
 GNOME 2.X sessions, not all of the stuff required for Unity. We could
 probably also use a page that tracks/examines what patches to
 non-Ayatana packages that Ubuntu is carrying in order to build Unity.

 Also, it should be noted that Unity is currently implemented as a
 plugin to the Compiz 0.9.x branch. Which is only in experimental, so
 uploads need to be targeted there.

 - Andrew Starr-Bochicchio




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTi=4xqskwsjqznj4xhxrfgxh_-gcsyb2fq0wp...@mail.gmail.com

Bug#609278: [Pkg-ayatana-devel] progress on Unity?

[Adnan Hodzic]

 I don't know what kind of patches those are, but this obviously need to be
 discussed with each relevant maintainer. We can't decide for them. But
 duplicating packages would be really bad.

I think this is because Squeeze was being prepared for release, so
everybody was revolving around that goal. I believe situation has
changed, and that most of these packages have been synced by now and
that they are at least in experimental. If anything, I learned from
this process is that Ubuntu *does* push back the changes.

I even made a deps check http://paste.debian.net/plain/105221 but
please be *aware* this was almost a month ago. For instance now you're
able to find compiz-core 0.9.2.1+git20110226.f059fae9-4 in
experimental.

I'll redo the whole process by the end of this week, will let you know
of the results.


Adnan

On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org wrote:
 On Mon, 21 Mar 2011, Adnan Hodzic wrote:
 Before resuming this process I believe we need to figure out which way
 to go. I assume it's patching current Debian packages. As Raphael

 I don't know what kind of patches those are, but this obviously need to be
 discussed with each relevant maintainer. We can't decide for them. But
 duplicating packages would be really bad.

 Cheers,
 --
 Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer

 Follow my Debian News ▶ http://RaphaelHertzog.com (English)
                      ▶ http://RaphaelHertzog.fr (Français)




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTi=MsR153yiaXeiBx7KR=cokg6kjsyeq2rmuq...@mail.gmail.com

Bug#609791: ITP: light-themes -- Radiance and Ambiance themes for GNOME desktop

[Adnan Hodzic]

Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Adnan Hodzic ad...@foolcontrol.org



* Package name: light-themes
  Version : 0.1.8.4
  Upstream Author : Ubuntu Artwork Team ubuntu-...@lists.ubuntu.com
* URL : https://launchpad.net/light-themes
* License : (CCPL)
  Programming Lang: 
  Description : Radiance and Ambiance themes for GNOME desktop

This package contains Radiance and Ambiance themes for GNOME 2.x desktop and it 
consists of Metacity and GTK+ murrine engine. This theme is a default one use 
in Ubuntu.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110112143707.11152.15158.report...@havoc

Bug#609278: ITP: Unity -- Interface for Ubuntu Desktop Edition

[Adnan Hodzic]

Raphael, thank you, I have just registered for ayatana team.

Also regarding this ITP I would like to change couple of fields which are:

Upstream Author: Unity Team ayatana-...@lists.launchpad.net

Description: A desktop experience designed for efficiency of space and
interaction

Unity is a desktop experience which is designed for efficiency of
space and interaction, in perfect combination of familiarity and the
future. It embraces the values of GNOME: simplicity, style, usability
and accessibility, as well as on professional level, considereding
design thinking. It is designed by Canonical and Ayatana community and
it consists of a Compiz based plugin, which is heavily dependent on
OpenGL.


Adnan


On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 9:56 AM, Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org wrote:
 Hi,

 On Sat, 08 Jan 2011, Adnan Hodzic wrote:
 Package: wnpp
 Severity: wishlist
 Owner: Adnan Hodzic ad...@foolcontrol.org

 * Package name    : Unity
   Version         : 3.2.8
   Upstream Author : Ubuntu Core Developers 
 ubuntu-devel-disc...@lists.ubuntu.com
 * URL             : https://launchpad.net/unity
 * License         : (GPL3)
   Programming Lang: (C, C++, vala)
   Description     : Interface for Ubuntu Desktop Edition

 Unity is a graphical interface designed for Ubuntu Desktop Edition

 I suggest you join the pkg-ayatana team and maintain unity there:
 http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/pkg-ayatana

 Cheers,
 --
 Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer

 Follow my Debian News ▶ http://RaphaelHertzog.com (English)
                      ▶ http://RaphaelHertzog.fr (Français)




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/aanlkti=hu7fuu5vwg0dz+toucme-a0108+n3202t=...@mail.gmail.com

Bug#609278: ITP: Unity -- Interface for Ubuntu Desktop Edition

[Adnan Hodzic]

Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Adnan Hodzic ad...@foolcontrol.org


* Package name: Unity
  Version : 3.2.8
  Upstream Author : Ubuntu Core Developers 
ubuntu-devel-disc...@lists.ubuntu.com
* URL : https://launchpad.net/unity
* License : (GPL3)
  Programming Lang: (C, C++, vala)
  Description : Interface for Ubuntu Desktop Edition 

Unity is a graphical interface designed for Ubuntu Desktop Edition



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110108015726.2943.68138.report...@havoc

Bug#544499:

[Adnan Hodzic]

Alice,

I still don't see this package inside of Debian (it's been exactly a
year now), if you don't mind I'd like to take care of this package
myself.

Michael, I was thinking of targeting non-free


Regards,

Adnan



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktin1+6oq7zsj_cx0e=0uoynywklsrf4se3euq...@mail.gmail.com

Bug#595106: ITP: faenza-icon-theme -- Faenza icon theme

[Adnan Hodzic]

 What do you mean? I'm using it and the only icon that lacks is the one
 used by revelation for edit but I don't know if this is standard.

 There's a list of standard icon names at
 http://standards.freedesktop.org/icon-naming-spec/icon-naming-spec-latest.html#names

 If the icon theme miss icons, they'll be inherited from another theme,
 or default will be use. Depending on the coverage of the theme, it can
 give a really inconsistent desktop. There's no “maximum” numbers of
 icons a theme can provide, but a nice minimum is the freedesktop.org
 standard (see for example Tango and Oxygen themes).

Before I packaged this theme, I asked the author to add
Iceweasel/Icedove icons before I even start packaging it for Debian,
with 0.7 release he added these icons and many others.

I believe it doesn't miss a lot of icons, it's quite contrary. Also,
it's worth noting that this theme may not be mature as Tango and/or
Oxygen, but it's work in progress and it should definitely be
something worth paying attention to.

For those who want to try this icon theme, package can be found here:
http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/sponsor-pkglist?action=details;package=faenza-icon-theme

Besides inclusion of these icons, I was thinking of inclusion of the
gtk theme and everything else, Debian was always a superb distro, but
lacked looks if you ask me, and maybe it's time Squeeze changes this
since I believe Squeeze is one the most important Debian releases so
far.

Final look I was going for could be something like this:
http://foolcontrol.org/img/abs%20faenza.png


Adnan

On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 5:56 PM, Yves-Alexis Perez cor...@debian.org wrote:
 On 01/09/2010 17:26, Stefano Canepa wrote:
 On 1 September 2010 13:39, Yves-Alexis Perez cor...@debian.org wrote:
 On 01/09/2010 06:59, Adnan Hodzic wrote:
 Package: wnpp
 Severity: wishlist
 Owner: Adnan Hodzic ad...@foolcontrol.org

 * Package name    : faenza-icon-theme
   Version         : 0.7
   Upstream Author : Matthieu James matthieu.ja...@gmail.com
 * URL             : http://tiheum.deviantart.com/art/Faenza-Icons-173323228
 * License         : GPL
   Description     : Faenza icon theme

 This icon theme for Gnome provides monochromatic icons for panels, toolbars
 and buttons and colourful squared icons for devices, applications, folder,
 files and menu items.

 Does it provide complete freedesktop.org coverage?

 What do you mean? I'm using it and the only icon that lacks is the one
 used by revelation for edit but I don't know if this is standard.

 There's a list of standard icon names at
 http://standards.freedesktop.org/icon-naming-spec/icon-naming-spec-latest.html#names

 If the icon theme miss icons, they'll be inherited from another theme,
 or default will be use. Depending on the coverage of the theme, it can
 give a really inconsistent desktop. There's no “maximum” numbers of
 icons a theme can provide, but a nice minimum is the freedesktop.org
 standard (see for example Tango and Oxygen themes).

 Cheers,
 --
 Yves-Alexis






--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktin_qhdfnv_lhxlwt77vmfxjwff75zquofj-f...@mail.gmail.com

Bug#595106: ITP: faenza-icon-theme -- Faenza icon theme

[Adnan Hodzic]

Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Adnan Hodzic ad...@foolcontrol.org

* Package name: faenza-icon-theme
  Version : 0.7
  Upstream Author : Matthieu James matthieu.ja...@gmail.com
* URL : http://tiheum.deviantart.com/art/Faenza-Icons-173323228
* License : GPL
  Description : Faenza icon theme

This icon theme for Gnome provides monochromatic icons for panels, toolbars 
and buttons and colourful squared icons for devices, applications, folder,
files and menu items.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100901045919.21946.6828.report...@havoc

Bug#573822: (no subject)

[Adnan Hodzic]

Yes, I am too working on my NM application, however would love to take
care of gwibber :)

Let me know if you need/want my help.

Adnan



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#563195: (no subject)

[Adnan Hodzic]

 If you are interested and able to jump in, please reply to this bug.

I'm both interested and able to jump, you lead the way :)


Adnan



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#516255: Bug #516255 ITA: azureus -- BitTorrent Client

[Adnan Hodzic]

Hey,

 I suggest you ask Adnan (CC'ed) if he has still interest in it.
 Maybe you can both adopt it and work on it.

Adrian, I thought this was adopted by the other guy who showed interest in
adopting azureus, and no interest with working together whatsoever, so
I thought it was closed deal and I kinda gave up on azureus,

I'm still interested! 100% interested, and I'd love to work on it
together with somebody else. Right now I'm somewhat busy (attending
debconf9 - volunteer) but I'd love to finally finish packaging azureus :)

Felix do let me know what's it gonna be since I'm in, let's do this.

Adnan

On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 11:41 +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
 Hi,
 
 There's any chance I can adopt azureus and vuze?
 
 I suggest you ask Adnan (CC'ed) if he has still interest in it.
 Maybe you can both adopt it and work on it.
 If not then you can IMO go ahead and prepare a new package and upload it
 to mentors.debian.net and find a sponsor.
 Unfortunately I can't sponsor it, because I'm just a DM not a DD.
 


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#516255: Bug #516255 ITA: azureus -- BitTorrent Client

[Adnan Hodzic]

Adrian,

 But, as I may recall, any help is welcome (reviewing, testing, patching,
 etc). 

I'm up for doing all of those, just please let me know once you need some of 
that.

Adnan

On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 09:57 -0400, Adrian Perez wrote:
 Hello everybody, if you check the title, I changed it to ITA. See the
 control request. 
 Glad to know there are so many people interested in it!
 I'm almost finished packaging Azureus-4.2.0.4, but as you may know,
 swt-gtk (3.4.2) was my first priority. 
 Sorry about not giving more details in this bug, but I'm working with
 Shaun Jackman, which is the previous maintainer of both. 
 Since the package is hugely outdated, there's a lot of work to do
 (fix-reflect bugs), I'm willing to migrate the pkg to cdbs, patches to
 quilt, it's a hard work so please be patient, check the azureus bug
 reports (there's more than 40...), so again, be patient.
 But, as I may recall, any help is welcome (reviewing, testing, patching,
 etc). 
 
 
 On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 13:40 +0200, Adnan Hodzic wrote:
  Hey,
  
   I suggest you ask Adnan (CC'ed) if he has still interest in it.
   Maybe you can both adopt it and work on it.
  
  Adrian, I thought this was adopted by the other guy who showed interest in
  adopting azureus, and no interest with working together whatsoever, so
  I thought it was closed deal and I kinda gave up on azureus,
  
  I'm still interested! 100% interested, and I'd love to work on it
  together with somebody else. Right now I'm somewhat busy (attending
  debconf9 - volunteer) but I'd love to finally finish packaging azureus :)
  
  Felix do let me know what's it gonna be since I'm in, let's do this.
  
  Adnan
  
  On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 11:41 +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
   Hi,
   
   There's any chance I can adopt azureus and vuze?
   
   I suggest you ask Adnan (CC'ed) if he has still interest in it.
   Maybe you can both adopt it and work on it.
   If not then you can IMO go ahead and prepare a new package and upload it
   to mentors.debian.net and find a sponsor.
   Unfortunately I can't sponsor it, because I'm just a DM not a DD.
   


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part