Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Danny Edel <deb...@danny-edel.de>
* Package name: pytest-benchmark
Version : 3.0.0
Upstream Author : Ionel Cristian Mărieș <cont...@ionelmc.ro>
* URL : https://github.com/ionelmc/pytest-benchmark
* License :
Hello everyone,
I was surprised to see the reaction my comments generated and like
Gianfranco, I also want to ask Marc to consider rethinking his decision.
I do not think you are spoiling the fun or that insisting on
oldfashioned keeping is a bad thing. I apologize that my choice of
words made
On Tue, 08 Sep 2015 09:23:51 -0400 Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>
> How does it differ from the package that Gianfranco and Marc have been
> working on? (In cc.)
>
> A.
It doesn't necessarily "differ" in the sense that it would be a
different from-scratch packaging. It is 95% their package, plus a
On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 14:14:35 +0200 Danny Edel wrote:
> I am currently working on a proof-of-concept version of d/rules doing
> all of that, I will report back here once I've got a working draft.
I have pushed a working packaging to github. It's not of
release-quality, but it should
Hi,
I have been investigating the differences of "upstream release tarball"
versus "upstream git tag/github tarball" and I noticed that "upstream
release" differs a bit:
(1) Release tarball ships .c files compiled from python sources with
cython (examples: borg/crypto.c, borg/chunker.c)
(2)
On Sat, 11 Jul 2015 12:57:54 +0200 Marc Haber
mh+debian-packa...@zugschlus.de wrote:
I have stitched together a quick package and pushed it to collab-maint,
ssh://git.debian.org/git/collab-maint/borgbackup.git
I do not intend to upload until a team of at least two active people
maintaining
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Danny Edel deb...@danny-edel.de
* Package name: dspdfviewer
Version : 1.13
Upstream Author : Danny Edel m...@danny-edel.de
* URL : http://dspdfviewer.danny-edel.de/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C++
Description
7 matches
Mail list logo
