Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Gaudenz Steinlin <gaud...@debian.org>
* Package name: gnome-shell-extension-sound-device-chooser
Version : GIT upstream snapshot
Upstream Author : Gopi Sankar Karmegam
* URL : https://github.com/kgshank/gse-sound-output-
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Gaudenz Steinlin <gaud...@debian.org>
* Package name: ruby-puppet-syntax
Version : 2.0.0
Upstream Author : Dan Carley
* URL : https://github.com/gds-operations/puppet-syntax
* License : Expat
Programming Lang
Hi Kjetil
Kjetil Kjernsmo kje...@kjernsmo.net writes:
Hi!
As an orienteer, I would love to see this in Debian, so just a note to
encourage it. :-)
Thanks for your encouragement.
Since there is some controversy as to the description, may I suggest
something like (I don't think OCAD
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Gaudenz Steinlin gaud...@debian.org
* Package name: openorienteering-mapper
Version : 0.5.96
Upstream Author : Kai Pastor dg...@darc.de and Thomas Schoeps
tom.scho...@gmail.com
* URL : http://oorienteering.sourceforge.net
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Gaudenz Steinlin gaud...@debian.org
* Package name: sireader
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : Gaudenz Steinlin gaud...@durcheinandertal.ch
* URL : http://bosco.durcheinandertal.ch/
* License : GPLv3
Programming Lang
Hi Pierre
Are you still intending to package sbsingtool? I saw that there was a
package in NEW at some point, but it has apparently been rejected. Do
you know the reasons for this?
I made a package based on the Ubuntu package some time ago for a Debian
derivative. See
Best regards
Zymunt Krynicki
On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 5:59 PM, Gaudenz Steinlin gaud...@debian.org wrote:
Hi Zygmunt
I just stumbled over this bug report when I wondered why there is no
twine package in Debian.
The last response from you indicates that the requests package was
rejected. Why
Hi Zygmunt
I just stumbled over this bug report when I wondered why there is no
twine package in Debian.
The last response from you indicates that the requests package was
rejected. Why did you package that? There is already a python-reqeusts
package in Debian since a long time. Is this not the
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I intend to orphan the mouseemu package.
The package description is:
Mouseemu is a daemon to emulate mouse buttons on trackpads
with only one button. It lets you:
- emulate middle and right click
- emulate mouse wheel
- block trackpad while typing
.
It
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Hi
As I no longer use Mac-on-Linux for myself and I no longer regularly use
my powerpc machine I'm orphaning mol.
Formally mol is team maintained by the MOL Packaging Team, but beside
very few one time contributions no one other than me ever did any
packaging work
Hi Andreas
I've just discovered your RFP bug for a Debian package of
Parse::Dia::SQL and the discussion you had on the debian-perl
mailinglist.
I'm a Debian Developer and willing to help you with the package and to
sponsor your package once it's ready.
In return I would love if you could fix
Hi
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 11:26:04PM +0200, oliv...@na.icar.cnr.it wrote:
Hi,
I do agree with Manuel objections.
Maybe you can call it ant-sinfo, from the name of the laboratory where
the tool is developed.
Best Regards
--
Gennaro
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 04:07:36PM +0200, Manuel
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Gaudenz Steinlin gaud...@debian.org
* Package name: sinfo
Version : 0.0.33
Upstream Author : Jürgen Rinas jri...@gmx.de
* URL : http://www.ant.uni-bremen.de/whomes/rinas/sinfo/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Hi
The current state of MOL in Debian is broken since quite some time. If
we want to have MOL in the next release we have to act now!
Currently there are 2 major issues holding up the MOL packages in
Debian.
- Unusable kernel modules: This is caused by the removal of
handle_mm_fault in
On Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 11:07:18AM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
On Fri, Dec 21, 2007 at 04:23:52PM +0100, Guus Sliepen wrote:
On Fri, Dec 21, 2007 at 02:28:28PM +, Gerrit Pape wrote:
qmail is meant as a replacement for the entire sendmail-binmail system
on typical
Hi Rogério
Welcome!
On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 09:09:08AM -0300, Rogério Brito wrote:
Just for your information, I used to have success with MoL during the
2.4 era, when BenH tree was *the* tree to use to have your system
working with Linux. It's been a long time.
I don't think 2.4 is still
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 12:01:03PM -0400, Joseph Jezak wrote:
- fix building mol twice in a row (double compilation support release goal!)
Can I have more details on this? What's the problem?
It's only a problem of the debian package. Because of the Debian Free
Software Guidelines I have to
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Hi
The Mac-On-Linux packages are formally team maintained, but actually I'm
the only active maintainer and my time is quite limited. This is why it
took quite long to prepare the long overdue update to support the latest
kernels. I would be glad to welcome some
Hi Stefan
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 02:14:54AM +0200, Stefan Ott wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stefan Ott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: xfce4-cpufreq-plugin
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Joshua Kwan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL :
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 02:01:17PM +0200, Stefan Ott wrote:
Hi Gaudenz
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 12:16:15PM +0200, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
Hi Stefan
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 02:14:54AM +0200, Stefan Ott wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stefan Ott [EMAIL PROTECTED
reopen 187973
Thanks
I still intend to package Typo3. Because this is quite a large
application I would be happy to find some co-maintainers. If you
are also interested in Typo3, please contact me.
Gaudenz
--
Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter.
Try again. Fail again. Fail better.
~ Samuel
Hi Javier
I'm currently in the process of going over all the packages owned by the
Debian QA Team and evaluate which ones are still usefull and wich ones
should be removed.
Below you find my report about binstats. Your package makejail depends
on binstats and I wanted to ask you if you would
Hi Bruno
I'm currently checking all packages owned by the Debian QA Group to
decide whether they should be removed from Debian or not.
In October 2004 you stated your intend to adopt this package. Are you
still working on it?
If you no longer intend to work on bbconf I will investigate some
Usage statistic:
popcon vote: 17, last bug real[1] report: 197 days ago
NMUs:
none
Bugs:
Total: 3 Real[1]: 3
Time since O:
1 1/2 years
Usefullness:
from O report:
I have orphaned bblaunch, as I no longer use it, its upstream is dead,
and I no longer use blackbox. In addition, word is that
Hi Dinesh
I'm currently checking all packages owned by the Debian QA Group to
decide whether they should be removed from Debian or not.
In August 2004 you stated your intend to adopt this package. And you
said you are working with your sponsor to get a new version into the
archive. Are you still
Usage statistic:
popcon vote: 10, last bug real[1] report: 125 days ago
NMUs:
2 (including 1 QA upload)
Bugs:
Total: 1 Real[1]: 1
Upstream:
upstream page noted in debian/copyright is dead, no new upstream page
found
Dependency:
none
Time since O:
3/4 year
Distributions:
stable (0.3-3),
Hi Stefan
I'm currently checking all packages owned by the Debian QA Group to
decide whether they should be removed from Debian or not.
In November 2004 you stated your intend to adopt this package. Are you
still working on it?
If you no longer intend to work on aeromail I will investigate
Usage statistic:
popcon vote: 12
NMUs:
3 NMUs + QA Upload, no Maintainer upload since 2001/08
Bugs:
Total: 0 Real[1]: 0
Upstream:
Unable to locate upstream homepage. The page mentioned in this bug
is no longer accessible.
Dependency:
no reverse dependencies
Time since O:
1 year, 8 months
Hi Leo
Back in May you submitted an ITP for pearpc. You said you want to wait
for pearpc version 0.2 to come out. Are you still interested in
packaging pearpc? It's currently at version 0.3.1.
If you are no longer interested I will prepare packages of pearpc.
Gaudenz
signature.asc
29 matches
Mail list logo
