Bug#312740: Request regarding ROTE library

2005-07-07 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 10:50:02PM -0300, Bruno Oliveira wrote:
 Ok folks, the new release (0.2.8) is out and includes a new function:
 rote_vt_get_pty_fd, which returns the pty's file descriptor. Phil
 should be able to use this in order to eliminate the need to include
 roteprivate.h...
 
 As for generating the rote.la file, I don't know how to do that since
 I don't use libtool :-) If any of you would care to send me a patch,
 that would be nice. I'll eventually learn libtool but not in the near
 future..

Bruno,

Thanks for all the work.  I will have the new version packaged and
uploaded fairly soon.  The 0.2.6+20050511 still has not made it out of
the NEW queue and into unstable, but it will be there soon, as it has
been about a week.  In the mean time, the packages are still available
on my website.

As soon as Phil modifies anyterm to work with the new ROTE version, I
will package and have anyterm uploaded to Sid.

-Roberto

-- 
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://familiasanchez.net/~sanchezr


pgpJPFEf1DblB.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#312740: Request regarding ROTE library

2005-07-07 Thread Bruno Oliveira
Ok folks, the new release (0.2.8) is out and includes a new function:
rote_vt_get_pty_fd, which returns the pty's file descriptor. Phil
should be able to use this in order to eliminate the need to include
roteprivate.h...

As for generating the rote.la file, I don't know how to do that since
I don't use libtool :-) If any of you would care to send me a patch,
that would be nice. I'll eventually learn libtool but not in the near
future..

Best regards,
Bruno T. C. de Oliveira

On 6/27/05, Roberto C. Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Bruno,
 
 Thanks for the reply.  A new release soon after the change would be
 nice.  If not, please let us know and I can grab a new CVS snapshot with
 which to package a new Debian version.
 
 Phil,
 
 As soon as the dependency on roteprivate.h can be removed, the way will
 be clear for an official Debian package.  It should be only a few days
 after you make the new version of anyterm available that a package will
 be in Sid.
 
 -Roberto
 
 On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 12:20:54AM -0300, Bruno Oliveira wrote:
  a patch to add that funcionality would be most welcome. As for the
  reading of the pty descriptor, I guess there should be an interface
  function for returning it, rather than moving the field to rote.h.
  That way binary compatibility won't be broken.
 
  I'm a little short on time so I'll do those modifications after july
  4. But if any of you want to send me a patch for that I'll apply it
  right away!
 
  Thanks for the continued interest in my software,
  Bruno
 
  On 6/23/05, Roberto C. Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Bruno,
  
   I am working on packaging your ROTE library for Debian, as I am also
   packaging anyterm, which depends on ROTE.  I have a couple of requests.
  
   First, would it be possible for you to modify the library build process
   to create a librote.a and librote.la for inclusion in the development
   version of the library package?
  
   Second, would it be possible for you to include the information from
   roteprivate.h used by anyterm [0] in the rote.h header?  I ask this
   becuase it is not possible for the Debian package build system to make
   roteprivate.h, which is only in the source of rote, available during the
   build of anyterm.  This leaves only a couple of options, none of which
   are acceptable.  Specifically, the anyterm pacakge would need to
   include a copy of roteprivate.h (which would couple the two packages too
   tightly), or Phil would need to include a copy of the rote source in
   anyterm, which misses the point of a library.
  
   I have emailed Phil about this, but this is not a very high priority for
   him since the current setup works for him and the changes we need to
   make this happen will cause you difficulties by breaking binary
   compatibility in your library.
  
   If you would be willing to accept patches for inclusion in the next
   release or if there is anything else we can do, please let me know.
  
   -Roberto
  
   [0] http://anyterm.org/1.1/install.html
  
   --
   Roberto C. Sanchez
   http://familiasanchez.net/~sanchezr
  
  
  
 
 
  --
  Bruno Takahashi C. de Oliveira
 
 --
 Roberto C. Sanchez
 http://familiasanchez.net/~sanchezr
 
 
 


-- 
Bruno Takahashi C. de Oliveira



Bug#312740: Request regarding ROTE library

2005-06-27 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
Bruno,

Thanks for the reply.  A new release soon after the change would be
nice.  If not, please let us know and I can grab a new CVS snapshot with
which to package a new Debian version.

Phil,

As soon as the dependency on roteprivate.h can be removed, the way will
be clear for an official Debian package.  It should be only a few days
after you make the new version of anyterm available that a package will
be in Sid.

-Roberto

On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 12:20:54AM -0300, Bruno Oliveira wrote:
 a patch to add that funcionality would be most welcome. As for the
 reading of the pty descriptor, I guess there should be an interface
 function for returning it, rather than moving the field to rote.h.
 That way binary compatibility won't be broken.
 
 I'm a little short on time so I'll do those modifications after july
 4. But if any of you want to send me a patch for that I'll apply it
 right away!
 
 Thanks for the continued interest in my software,
 Bruno
 
 On 6/23/05, Roberto C. Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Bruno,
  
  I am working on packaging your ROTE library for Debian, as I am also
  packaging anyterm, which depends on ROTE.  I have a couple of requests.
  
  First, would it be possible for you to modify the library build process
  to create a librote.a and librote.la for inclusion in the development
  version of the library package?
  
  Second, would it be possible for you to include the information from
  roteprivate.h used by anyterm [0] in the rote.h header?  I ask this
  becuase it is not possible for the Debian package build system to make
  roteprivate.h, which is only in the source of rote, available during the
  build of anyterm.  This leaves only a couple of options, none of which
  are acceptable.  Specifically, the anyterm pacakge would need to
  include a copy of roteprivate.h (which would couple the two packages too
  tightly), or Phil would need to include a copy of the rote source in
  anyterm, which misses the point of a library.
  
  I have emailed Phil about this, but this is not a very high priority for
  him since the current setup works for him and the changes we need to
  make this happen will cause you difficulties by breaking binary
  compatibility in your library.
  
  If you would be willing to accept patches for inclusion in the next
  release or if there is anything else we can do, please let me know.
  
  -Roberto
  
  [0] http://anyterm.org/1.1/install.html
  
  --
  Roberto C. Sanchez
  http://familiasanchez.net/~sanchezr
  
  
  
 
 
 -- 
 Bruno Takahashi C. de Oliveira

-- 
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://familiasanchez.net/~sanchezr


pgpRqDhedI0sZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#312740: Request regarding ROTE library

2005-06-26 Thread Bruno Oliveira
a patch to add that funcionality would be most welcome. As for the
reading of the pty descriptor, I guess there should be an interface
function for returning it, rather than moving the field to rote.h.
That way binary compatibility won't be broken.

I'm a little short on time so I'll do those modifications after july
4. But if any of you want to send me a patch for that I'll apply it
right away!

Thanks for the continued interest in my software,
Bruno

On 6/23/05, Roberto C. Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Bruno,
 
 I am working on packaging your ROTE library for Debian, as I am also
 packaging anyterm, which depends on ROTE.  I have a couple of requests.
 
 First, would it be possible for you to modify the library build process
 to create a librote.a and librote.la for inclusion in the development
 version of the library package?
 
 Second, would it be possible for you to include the information from
 roteprivate.h used by anyterm [0] in the rote.h header?  I ask this
 becuase it is not possible for the Debian package build system to make
 roteprivate.h, which is only in the source of rote, available during the
 build of anyterm.  This leaves only a couple of options, none of which
 are acceptable.  Specifically, the anyterm pacakge would need to
 include a copy of roteprivate.h (which would couple the two packages too
 tightly), or Phil would need to include a copy of the rote source in
 anyterm, which misses the point of a library.
 
 I have emailed Phil about this, but this is not a very high priority for
 him since the current setup works for him and the changes we need to
 make this happen will cause you difficulties by breaking binary
 compatibility in your library.
 
 If you would be willing to accept patches for inclusion in the next
 release or if there is anything else we can do, please let me know.
 
 -Roberto
 
 [0] http://anyterm.org/1.1/install.html
 
 --
 Roberto C. Sanchez
 http://familiasanchez.net/~sanchezr
 
 
 


-- 
Bruno Takahashi C. de Oliveira



Bug#312740: Request regarding ROTE library

2005-06-23 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
Bruno,

I am working on packaging your ROTE library for Debian, as I am also
packaging anyterm, which depends on ROTE.  I have a couple of requests.

First, would it be possible for you to modify the library build process
to create a librote.a and librote.la for inclusion in the development
version of the library package?

Second, would it be possible for you to include the information from
roteprivate.h used by anyterm [0] in the rote.h header?  I ask this
becuase it is not possible for the Debian package build system to make
roteprivate.h, which is only in the source of rote, available during the
build of anyterm.  This leaves only a couple of options, none of which
are acceptable.  Specifically, the anyterm pacakge would need to
include a copy of roteprivate.h (which would couple the two packages too
tightly), or Phil would need to include a copy of the rote source in
anyterm, which misses the point of a library.

I have emailed Phil about this, but this is not a very high priority for
him since the current setup works for him and the changes we need to
make this happen will cause you difficulties by breaking binary
compatibility in your library.

If you would be willing to accept patches for inclusion in the next
release or if there is anything else we can do, please let me know.

-Roberto

[0] http://anyterm.org/1.1/install.html

-- 
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://familiasanchez.net/~sanchezr


pgpzVgPd726Go.pgp
Description: PGP signature